Assessing Individual Differences in Spatial Strategies

Abstract

This research examined the strategies, emotions, and beliefs described by participants completing a complex three dimensional spatial task. After completing the task, participants examined a video of themselves performing the task. During the video performance, participants completed a thought listing exercise designed to elicit strategies used, as well participants' beliefs about their own adequacy and the degree of difficulty of the task. These data were coded by two independent observers. Strategies, beliefs, and emotions reported were predicted both by the sex of the participant and the success at the task. Unsuccessful males and females did not differ from one another in their reported strategies, beliefs, or emotions. However, successful males reported many more specific strategies, whereas successful females reported greater emotional regulation. Additionally, trial and error was identified by successful females as their main strategy. Guidelines for eliciting spatial strategies follow.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ekstrom

R. B.

French

J. W.

Harman

H. H.

(1976). Kit of Factor Referenced Cognitive Tests. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.

Steele

C. M.

Aronson

(2000). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. In Stangor

. Stereotypes and prejudice: Essential readings. Key readings in social psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis, p 369–389.

Vandenberg

S. G.

Kuse

A. R.

(1978). Mental rotations: A group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Mntnr Skills, 47, 599–604.

Voyer

Bryden

(1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250–270.