A multi-class session exercise was developed to provide experiential learning of principles of investigation bias and diagnostic reasoning while applying principles of logic in accident causation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DruryC. G.WoodcockK.RichardsI.SaracA.ShyhallaK.A new model of how people investigate incidents. Proceedings of HFES2002.
2.
DruryC. G.RichardsI.SaracA.ShyhallaK.WoodcockK. (2000) Measuring the effectiveness of error investigation and human factors training. Report for Ofc. Aviat. Med. (AAM-240) F.A.A. Contract DTFA01–94-C-01013.
3.
HendrickK.BennerL. (1987) Investigating accidents with STEP. New York: Marcel Dekker.
4.
RasmussenJ. (1990) Learning from Experience? How? Some research issues in industrial risk management. In LeplatJDe TerssacG.Les Facteurs Humaines de la Fiabilité dans les Systems Complexes. Marseilles: Octarès.
5.
SpearJ. E. (2002) Incident Investigation: a problem-solving process. Professional Safety. April 2002: 25–30.
6.
WoodcockK. (1996) Causal reasoning in industrial safety specialists. PhD Dissertation. University of Toronto.
7.
WoodcockK.SmileyA. M. (2001-submitted) Developing simulated investigations for occupational accident investigation studies. (Draft available from author on request.)
