This study was designed to identify any effects of listener gender in the “cocktail party effect,” in which the gender of target and distractor voices has been shown to effect a listener's ability to detect and correctly respond to commands given in a multiple simultaneous talker task. Two experiments demonstrated that although there is no main effect of listener gender in any performance measure, the gender of the listener does interact with the genders of the target and distractor talkers in some conditions. This finding is potentially relevant to the customization of acoustic displays for maximum effectiveness with users of either gender.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoliaR. S.NelsonW. T.EricsonM. A.SimpsonB. D. (2000). A speech corpus for multitalker communications research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1065–1066.
2.
BoliaR. S.NelsonW. T.MorleyR. M. (2001). Asymmetric performance in the cocktail party effect: Implications for the design of spatial audio displays. Human Factors, 43, 12–20.
3.
BrungartD. S.SimpsonB. D.EricsonM. A.ScottK. R. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 2527–2538.
4.
CaplanP. J.MacPhersonG. M.TobinP. (1985). Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist? A multilevel critique with new data. American Psychologist.40(7). 786–799.
5.
HaasM. W.NelsonW. T.ReppergerD. W.BoliaR. S.ZachariasG. (2001). Applying Adaptive Control and Display Characteristics to Future Air Force Crew Stations. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11(2), 223–235.
6.
KimuraD. (1961). Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 15, 156–165.
7.
KimuraD. (1967). Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 3, 163–178.
8.
LevyJ.HellerW. (1992). Gender differences in human neuropsychological function. In GerallH.MoltzH.WardL. L., Sexual Differentiation (Vol. 11, pp. 245–274). New York: Plenum Press.
9.
LohmanD. F.PellegrinoJ. W.AldertonD. L.RegianJ. W. (1987). Dimensions and components of individual differences in spatial abilities. In IrvineS. H.NewsteadS. E., Intelligence and Cognition (pp. 253–313). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
10.
WelshT. N.ElliotD. (2001). Gender differences in a dichotic listening and movement task: lateralization or strategy? Neuropsychologia, 39 (1), 25–35.
11.
WildingJ.CookS. (2000). Sex differences and individual consistency in voice identification. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91 (2), 535–538.
