Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

An experimental study was performed to evaluate several types of automation for time-pressured replanning tasks. Subjects modified a two-dimensional route using waypoint manipulation on a computer screen in response to a sudden change in the displayed environment while having access to one of four types of automation. In addition to a baseline case without automation, subjects received automated assistance that either reduced hazard exposure, ensured meeting time-to-target and fuel constraints, or combined hazard avoidance with time and fuel constraints. Time pressure was imposed by requiring the route to be replanned within four different time limits of less than one minute. Results show that the benefit of automation decreased as time pressure was relaxed. Subjects showed reticence to deviate from highly automated route suggestions even when significant improvements were still possible. In addition, partial automation induced more errors than in cases with no automation, highlighting the potential negative effects of introducing automation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aust

(1996). “Mission Planner Evaluation in the Mission Reconfigurable Cockpit.” IEEE Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1, A96-37576 10-1, pp. 102–108, May 20–23.

Endsley

M.R.

Kiris

E.O.

(1995). “The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation.” Human Factors, vol. 37(2), 1995, pp. 381–394.

Layton

Smith

P.J.

McCoy

C.E.

(1994). “Design of a Cooperative Problem-Solving System for En-Route Flight Planning: An Empirical Evaluation.” Human Factors, 36 (1), pp. 94–119.

Moray

Inagaki

Itoh

(2000). “Adaptive Automation, Trust, and Self-Confidence in Fault Management of Time-Critical Tasks.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2000, vol. 6, no. 1. pp. 45–58.

Parasuraman

Riley

V.A.

(1997). “Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse.” Human Factors, vol. 39(2), 1997, pp. 230–253.

Parasuraman

Sheridan

T. B.

Wickens

C.D.

(2000). “A Model for Types and Levels of Human Interaction with Automation.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 30(3), May 2000. pp. 286–297.

Sarter

N.B.

Woods

D.D.

(1995). “How in the World Did We Ever Get into that Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control.” Human Factors, 37 (1), pp. 5–19.

Scerbo

M.W.

(1996). “Theoretical Perspectives on Adaptive Automation.” Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications, Eds. Parasuraman

Mouloua

. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahawah, NJ, pp. 37–64.

Schulte

Stutz

Klockner

(1999). “Cognitive Concepts for Tactical Mission Management.” Proceeding from the NATO System Concepts and Integration Panel Symposium in Florence, Italy, 27–29 September.

10.

Sexton

G.A.

(1988). “Cockpit-Crew Systems Design and Integration.” Human Factors in Aviation. Eds. Wiener

E.L.

Nagel

D.C.

. Academic Press: NY. pp. 495–526.

11.

Stringer

J.R.

(2002). “Weapons.” Airman, vol. 46, no. 1. pp. 44–56.

12.

Taylor

R.M.

Reising

(1998). “The Human-Electronic Crew: Human-Computer Collaborative Teamworking.” NASA CP 19990018356.

13.

Wiener

E.L.

(1988). “Cockpit Automation.” Human Factors in Aviation, Eds. Wiener

E.L.

Nagel

D.C.

. Academic Press: NY. pp. 433–461.

Experimental Study of Automation to Support Time-Critical Replanning Decisions

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References