The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a technique to help pilots prioritize tasks. A part-task simulator experiment was conducted in which three groups of general aviation pilot participants flew pre-and post-training flights. Participants in two groups received task prioritization training between the flights while those in a control group did not. Task prioritization error rates and prospective memory error rates from pre-and post-training flights were compared. Task prioritization and memory error rates improved in the training groups and did not improve in the control group. However, these findings must be considered preliminary, as several issues remain to be resolved by follow-on studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsM. J.TennyY. J.PewR. W. (1991). State-of-the-Art Report: Strategic workload and the cognitive management of advanced multi-task systems. SOAR CSERIAC 91-6. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Crew System Ergonomics Information Analysis Center.
2.
ChouC. D.MadhavanD.FunkK.H. (1996). Studies of Cockpit Task Management Errors. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology., 6(4): 307–320.
3.
DamosD. (1991). Multiple-task performance.London: Taylor and Francis.
4.
DamosD.L. (1997). Using interruptions to identify task prioritization in part 121 air carrier operations. Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (4), Columbus, OH, April 27-May 1, 1997.
5.
DetweilerM.SchneiderW. (1991). Modeling the acquisition of dual-task skill in a connectionist/control architecture. In D.L. Damos Multiple task performance..
6.
London: Taylor & Francis Ltd. Devore, J. L (1987). Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
7.
DismukesR. K.YoungG.SumwaltR. (1998). Cockpit interruptions and distractions: Effective management requires a careful balancing act. ASRS Directline, 10, 3.
8.
DismukesR. K.LoukopoulosL.D.JobeK. K. (2001). The challenges of managing concurrent and deferred tasks. In JensenR. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
9.
FunkK. H. (1991). Cockpit Task Management: Preliminary Definitions, Normative Theory, Error Taxonomy, and Design Recommendations. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology., 1(4): 271–285.
10.
FunkK. H.ChaW. C.WilsonR.ZaspelJ.BrauneR. (1997). Development and Evaluation of an Aid to Facilitate Agenda Management. Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Orlando, Florida, October 12–15, 1997.
11.
GawronV. (1991). State-of-the-art pilot performance and workload measurement. In JensenR.S. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 1124–1129). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, Department of Aviation.
12.
HartS.G. (1989). Crew Workload-Management Strategies: A Critical Factor in System Performance. Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 22–27). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, Department of Aviation.
13.
JohannsenG.RouseW.B. (1979). Mathematical concepts for modeling human behavior in complex man-machine systems. Human Factors, 21(6), 733–747.
14.
LatorellaK. A. (1996). Investigating Interruptions: An Example from the Flightdeck. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting.249–253.
15.
LoukopoulosL.D.DismukesR.K.BarshiI. (2001). Cockpit interruptions and distractions: A line observation study. In JensenR. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
16.
PattipatiK.R.KleinmanD.L. (1991). A review of the engineering models of information-processing and decision-making in multi-task supervisory control. In DamosD.L. (Ed.), Multiple task performance. (pp. 35–68). London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
17.
RabyM.WickensC.D. (1994). Strategic Workload Management and Decision Biases in Aviation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology., 4(3): 211–240.
18.
RogersW. H. (1996). Flight Deck Task Management: A Cognitive Engineering Analysis. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting.239–243.
19.
SchutteP. CTrujilloA C. (1996). Flight Crew Task Management in Non-normal Situations. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting.244–238.
20.
WickensC.D. (1984; 1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
21.
WilsonJ.R.FunkK. (1998). The Effect of Automation on the Frequency of Task Prioritization Errors on Commercial Aircraft Flight Decks: An ASRS Incident Report Study. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Human Error, Safety, and Systems Development, Seattle, Washington, 1998, pp. 6–16.
