Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Fault management (FM) performance and information sampling behavior were examined while participants operated a complex micro-world that simulated system failures within a generic life-support system of a spacecraft. One group of participants was supported by an integrated display that facilitated fault identification while the other group had to rely on separated raw data readings. The effects of two modes of intelligent automation support were also examined. At a low level of automation (LOA), fault identification was generated along with an advisory on a sequence of recovery actions to be implemented manually at the operator's discretion. The higher LOA generated fault identification but allowed the operator a veto against automatic implementation of the suggested recovery plan. Automated fault identification was unreliable 30% percent of the time; in these trials the automation missed fault identification, gave a false alarm to a nominal situation, or provided false or incomplete fault identification. Initiation of proper recovery when the automation failed was less accurate and slowest when operators were supplied with the non-integrated display, but only when they operated at the low LOA mode prior to the failure. This effect was associated with superior information sampling behavior at the higher LOA when automation was reliable. Display integration and the higher LOA thus supported more efficient sampling of fault relevant displays thereby, promoting better fault state awareness in the presence of reliable automation. This also benefited fault management when the automation failed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bennett

K.B.

Flach

J.M.

(1992). Graphical displays: Implications for divided attention, focused attention, and problem solving. Human Factors, 34, 513–533.

Billings

C.S.

(1991). Human-centered aircraft automation: A concept and guidelines (NASA Tech. Memorandum 102885). Moffet Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.

Dorais

G.A.

Bonasso

R.P.

Kortenkamp

Pell

Schreckenghost

(1998). Adjustable autonomy for human-centered autonomous system on Mars. In Zubrin

R.M.

Zubrin

(Eds.) Proceedings of the Founding Convention of the Mars Society; Part II, (pp. 397–420) Boulder, CO, Aug 13–16. Univelt: San Diego, CA.

Endsley

M.R.

Kiris

E.O.

(1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors, 37, 381–394.

Endsley

M.R.

Kaber

D.B.

(1999). Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42, 462–492.

Hart

S.G.

Staveland

L.E.

(1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Hancock

P. A.

Meshkati

(Eds.), Human mental workload. (pp. 143–154). New York: Plenum.

Hockey

G.R.J.

Wastell

Sauer

(1998). Effects of sleep deprivation and user interface on complex performance: a multilevel analysis of compensatory control. Human Factors, 40, 233–253.

Lorenz

Di Nocera

Parasuraman

(in press, a). Varying types and levels of automation in the support of dynamic fault management: An analysis of performance costs and benefits. In de Waard

Brookhuis

K. A.

Weikert

C.M.

Toffetti

, Human Factors in Transportation, Communication, Health, and the Workplace. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Shaker Publishing.

Lorenz

Di Nocera

Röttger

Parasuraman

(in press, b). Human interaction with automated fault management in a simulated spaceflight micro-world. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine.

10.

Molloy

Parasuraman

(1994). Automation-induced monitoring inefficiency: The role of display integration and redundand color coding. In Mouloua

Parasuraman

(eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 224–228). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

11.

Parasuraman

Riley

V.A.

(1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230253.

12.

Parasuraman

Sheridan

T.B.

Wickens

C.D.

(2000). A model of types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 30, 286–297.

13.

Sauer

Hockey

G.R.J.

Wastell

D.G.

(2000a). The effects of training on short- and long-term skill retention in a complex multiple-task environment. Ergonomics, 43, 2043–2064.

14.

Sauer

Wastell

D.G.

Hockey

G.R.W.

(2000b). A conceptual framework for designing micro-worlds for complex work domains: a case study of the Cabin Air Management System, Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 45–58.

15.

Sheridan

T.B.

(1992). Telerobotics, automation, and supervisory control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

16.

Vicente

K J.

Rasmussen

(1992). Ecological interface design: Theoretical foundations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 589–606.

17.

Wickens

C.D.

Hollands

(2000). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.

Display Integration Enhances Information Sampling and Decision Making in Automated Fault Management in a Simulated Spaceflight Micro-World

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References