Head-Up vs. Head-Down: Effects of Precision on Cue Effectiveness and Display Signaling

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the attentional effects in the presentation of cueing symbology with the use of a helmet-mounted display (HMD) relative to a handheld display, and how reduced cue precision (experiment 1) and increased clutter (experiment 2) might modulate these effects. Participants were asked to detect, identify, and give azimuth information for targets hidden in terrain presented in the far domain (i.e., the world) while performing a monitoring task in the near domain (i.e., the display) using either a HMD or hand-held display. The results revealed overall cueing benefits in target detection performance, with slight decrements when cue imprecision was greater than 7.5°. More importantly, undertrust of the cueing data, induced by decreased precision, widened attentional breadth on trials after the automation unexpectedly failed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Egeth

H.E.

Yantis

(1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology., 48, 269–297.

Fadden

Ververs

Wickens

C.D.

(1998). Costs and benefits of head-up display use: A meta-analytic approach. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Jonides

(1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In Long

Baddeley

(Eds.), Attention and Performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Lee

Moray

(1994). Trust, self confidence, & operators' adaptation to automation. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies., 40, 153–184.

Merlo

J.L.

Wickens

C.D.

Yeh

(1999). Effect of reliability on cue effectiveness and display signaling. (Technical Report ARL-99-4/FED-LAB-99-3). Savoy, IL: University of Illinois, Aviation Res. Lab.

National Research Council. (1997). Tactical Display for Soldiers: Human Factors Considerations. National Academy Press: Washington D.C.

Ockerman

J. J.

Pritchett

A.R.

(1998). Preliminary study of wearable computers for aircraft inspection. In Boy

Graeber

Robert

J.M.

(Eds.), HCI-Aero 1998: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics.

Parasuraman

Riley

(1997) Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2), 230–253.

Ververs

P. M.

Wickens

C. D.

(1998). Head-up displays: Effects of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8(4), 377–404.

10.

Wickens

C.D.

(1997). Attentional issues in head-up displays. In: Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: Integration of Theory and Application. London: A vebury Technical Pub. Co.

11.

Wickens

C.D.

Conejo

Gempler

(1999). Unreliable automated attention cueing for air-ground targeting and traffic maneuvering. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society: Santa Monica, CA.

12.

Wickens

C.D.

Kroft

Yeh

(2000). Data base overlay in electronic map design: Testing a computational model. Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress (pp. 3-451–3-454). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors & Ergonomics Society.

13.

Wickens

C.D.

Long

(1995). Object versus space-based models of visual attention: Implications for the design of head-up displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied., 1(3), 179–193.

14.

Yeh

Brandenburg

Wickens

C.D.

Merlo

J.L.

(2000). Up or down? A comparison of helmet mounted display and hand held display tasks with high clutter imagery. University of Illinois Institute of Aviation Technical Report (ARL-00-11/FED-LAB-00-3). Savoy, IL: Aviation Research Laboratory.

15.

Yeh

Wickens

C.D.

Seagull

F.J.

(1999). Target cueing in visual search: The effects of conformality and display location on the allocation of visual attention). Human Factors, 41(4), 524–542.