In combat and tactical situations, situation awareness is a key factor in the quality of decisionmaking. Currently, the US Army is investigating using digital systems, such as computer networks, digital imagery, and GPS, to enhance situation awareness at all levels of command. This article illustrates how digital technology is currently being used to enhance decisionmaking at the unit level and provides suggestions for how further advancements can be made.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelmanL.LeedomD. K.MurphyJ.KillamB. (1998). Description of Brigade C2 Decision Process (Army Research Laboratory Technical Report). Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD: Army Research Institute.
2.
BillingsC. E. (1997) Aviation automation: The search for a human-centered approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3.
Department of the Army (1997). Field Manual 101–5, Staff Organization and Operations. Washington, DC: Author.
4.
Department of Defense (2000, April) Report on the Plan for Fielding the First Digitized Division and First Digitized Corps: Presented to the Committee on Army Services, United States Senate, Second Session, 106th CongressWashington, DC: Author.
5.
EndsleyM. R. (1995). Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: A critical review. Proceedings of the International Conference on Experimental Analysis and Measurement of Situation Awareness, Daytona Beach, FL November 1–3 1995. Daytona Beach: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.
6.
GarlandD. J.PhillipsJ. N.TildenD. S.WiseJ. A. (1991). Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: Towards an objective measure. (Tech. Rep. No. CAAR-15498–91–1). Daytona Beach, FL: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Center for Aviation/Aerospace Research.
7.
KaempfGeorgeL.KleinGaryThordsenMarvinL.WolfSteve (1996). Decision making in complex naval command and control environments. Human Factors38(2) 220–231.
8.
McGuinnessBFoyL. (2000). Battlespace digitization: SA issues for commanders. Proceedings of the Human Performance, Situation Awareness, and Automation Conference (p. 125). Marietta, GA: SA Technologies.
9.
NormanD. A. (1988) The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
RandelJ. M.PughH. L.ReedS. K. (1996). Differences in expert and novice situation awareness in naturalistic decision making. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 45(5) 579–597.
12.
SalasE.PrinceC.BakerD. P.ShresthaL. (1995). Situation awareness in team performance: Implications for measurement and training. Special Issue: Situation awareness. Human Factors37(1) 123–136.
13.
SarterN. B.WoodsD. D. (1995). How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Special Issue: Situation awareness. Human Factors37(1) 5–19.
14.
Von ClausewitzC. (1984). On war. (HowardM.ParetP.) Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1820)
15.
WickensC. D. (1992). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance (2nd Ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
16.
WickensC. D.GordonS. E.LiuY. (1998). An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering. New York: Longman.
