Understanding the evolving, complex events on a battlefield requires a decision maker to integrate data from disparate sources. The study described herein extends previous work on cognitive integration. Twenty-one former Army battalion commanders participated in a simulation of an offensive military operation. In addition, twelve Army officers who serve as observers/controllers of units training for stability and support operations (SASO) were interviewed. The results of these studies, when compared to earlier studies strongly suggest that military decision makers seek out and integrate data based on context. Implications for design of decision support systems are also discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JonesD.EndsleyM. (2000). Overcoming representational errors in complex environments. Human Factors.42:3, 367–378.
2.
EndsleyM. (1988). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 97–101). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
3.
OrasanuJ.ConnollyT. (1993). The reinvention of decision making. In KleinG.OrasanuJ.CalderwoodR.ZsambokC.Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
4.
ShattuckL. G.GrahamJ. M.MerloJ. L.HahS. (2000). Cognitive integration: A study of how decision makers construct understanding in evolving contexts. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 44th Annual Meeting (pp. 116–119). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
5.
WoodsD. D.JohannesenL.CookR. I.SarterN. (1994). Behind Human Error: Cognitive Systems, Computers and Hindsight. (CSERIAC State of the Art Report 94–01). Dayton, OH: Crew Systems Ergonomic Information and Analysis Center.
