Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The primary mission of the National Weather Service (NWS) is the protection of life and property through the issuances of timely and accurate forecasts and warnings. This mission was never so tested for the NWS Forecast Office in Norman, Oklahoma as it was on May 3, 1999 when 58 tornadoes taking 42 lives and injuring hundreds more occurred in the Norman area of warning responsibility. Despite these tragic results, the casualties could have been much higher had warnings been less timely or the public non-responsive. This paper will illuminate impacts of the recent infusion of technology into the forecast environment which produced significant benefits, yet important challenges for decision makers to overcome. In addition, how the concept of situation awareness (SA), while fairly new to the NWS warning environment, played a key role with regards to managing the massive amounts of data available to decision makers prior to and during the outbreak will be discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brooks

H.E

Doswell

C. A.

, 2001: Normalized damage from major tornadoes in the United States: 1890–1999. Weather and Forecasting Volume 16, No. 1, pp 168–176.

DOC/NOAA/NWS, 1999a: VISION 2005, National Weather Service strategic plan for weather wather and climate services. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, August 1999, p 24.

Edwards

Thompson

R. L.

LaDue

J. G.

, 2000: Initiation of storm A (3 May 1999) along a possible horizontal convective roll. Preprints, 20th Conference on Severe Local Storms Orlando, Florida, pp 60–63.

Endsley

M. R.

, 1988: Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). Proceedings of the National Aerospace Electronics Conference. New York: IEEE. pp 789–795.

McCarthy

D. H.

Grice

Walts

D.S.

, 1992: A National Weather Service modernization preview: The Norman experience. Preprints, Symposium on Weather Forecasting, AMS, Atlanta pp 237–240.

Mileti

D. S.

Sorenson

J. H.

, 1990: Communication of emergency public warnings; A social science perspective and state-of-the-art assessment. Contract report ORNL-6609, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Martin Marietta Energy Systems, inc, U.S. Department of Energy, pp 31–19.

Pliske

Klinger

Hutton

Crandall

Knight

Klein

, 1997: Understanding skilled weather forecasting: Implication for training and the design of forecasting tools. Contractor Report AL/HR-CR-1997–002, United States Air Force, Material Command, Armstrong Laboratory, p76.

Quoetone

E. M.

Huckabee

, 1995: Anatomy of an Effective Warning: Event Anticipation, Data Integration, Feature Recognition. Preprints, 14th Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, AMS, Dallas, TX pp 420–425.

Wickens

C. D.

, 1992: Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.

10.

Zittel

Lee

, 2001: Performance of the Tornadic Detection Algorithm during the May 3, 1000 tornado outbreak., Weather and Forecasting submitted.

Impacts of Technology and Situation Awareness on Decision Making: Operational Observations from National Weather Service Warning Forecasters During the Historic May 3 1999 Tornado Outbreak

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References