In this paper we discuss the small, but growing, area of distributed teams and emphasize how work characteristics associated with such teams may alter both the processes and the products emerging from distributed interaction. We discuss these factors within the context of a construct we label team opacity and describe how the attitudes, behaviors, and cognitions of team members may be affected by a lack of co-location. We suggest that distributed team performance can best be understood through conceptualization of a coordination space within which distributed interaction occurs over time and space.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonA. H.SmallwoodL.MacDonaldR.MullinJ.FlemingA. M.O'MalleyC. (2000). Video data and video links in mediated communication: What do users value? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52, 165–187.
2.
BaddeleyA. D.HitchG. J. (1974). Working memory. In BowerG. H.The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8). London: Academic Press.
3.
BlackmanH. S.ByersJ. C.HillS. G.HallbertB. P. (2000). Impact of communication technology on the cognitive aspects of team decision making. Poster presented at the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, San Diego, CA.
4.
BlickensderferE.Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE. (1997). Fostering shared mental models through team self-correction: Theoretical bases and propositions. In BeyerleinM.JohnsonD.BeyerleinS.Advances in interdisciplinary studies in work teams (Vol. 4, pp. 249–279). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5.
BowersC.ThorntonC.BraunC.MorganB. B.SalasE. (1998). Automation, task difficulty, and aircrew performance. Military Psychology, 10, 259–274.
6.
BrewerW. F. (1987). Schemas versus mental models in human memory. In MorrisP.Modeling cognition (pp. 187–197). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7.
BrickmanB.HettingerL. J.HaasM. W. (2000). Multisensory interface design for complex task domains: Replacing information overload with meaning in tactical crew stations. International Journal of Aviation Psychology10, 273–290.
8.
BurdeaG.RichardP.CoiffetP. (1996). Multimodal virtual reality: Input-output devices, system integration, and human factors. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 5–24.
9.
Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE.ConverseS. A. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In CastellanN. J.Jr.Current issues in individual and group decision making (pp. 221–246). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
10.
ClanceyW. J.SachsP.SierhuisM.Van HoofR. (1998). BRAHMS: Simulating practice for work systems design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49, 831–865.
11.
DaftR. L.LengelR. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 191–233.
12.
DwyerD. J.OserR. L.SalasE.FowlkesJ. E. (1999). Performance measurement in distributed environments: Initial results and implications for training. Military Psychology, 11, 189–215.
13.
EchtK. V.MorrellR. W.ParkD. C. (1998). Effects of age and training formats on basic computer skill acquisition in older adults. Educational Gerontology, 24, 3–25.
14.
EngleR. W.KaneM. J.TuholskiS. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In MiyakeA.ShahP.Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Press.
15.
EntinE. E.SerfatyD. (1999). Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors, 47, 312–325.
16.
FioreS. M.SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ. A. (2001). Group dynamics and shared mental model development. In LondonM.How people evaluate others in organizations: Person perception and interpersonal judgment in Industrial/Organizational psychology (pp. 309–336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
FussellS.KraussR. (1989). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 203–219.
18.
GraetzK. A.BoyleE. S.KimbleC. E.ThompsonP.GarlochJ. L. (1998). Information sharing in face-to-face, teleconferencing, and electronic chat groups. Small Group Research, 29, 714–743.
19.
GutwinC.GreenbergS. (1998). Design for Individuals, Design for Groups: Tradeoffs between power and workspace awareness. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on CSCW. 207–216, ACM Press.
20.
GuzzoR. A.SalasE. (1995). Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21.
HammondJ.HarveyC. M.KoubekR. J. (2000). Effect of communication medium on virtual design team's workload. Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, 1, 77–80.
22.
HarveyC. M.KoubekR. J. (2000). Cognitive, social, and environmental attributes of distributed engineering collaboration: A review and proposed model. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 10, 369–393.
23.
HessK. P.HessS. M. (2000). The impacts of collaborative technologies on the functions of distributed, dynamic organizations. Paper presented at the 15th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
24.
HoggM. A. (1987). Social identity theory and group cohesiveness. In TurnerJ.Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 89–116). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
25.
HollingsheadA. B.McGrathJ. E.O'ConnorK. M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to- face work groups. Small Group Research, 24, 307–333.
26.
IckesW.GonzalezR. (1994). “Social” cognition and social cognition: From the subjective to the intersubjective. Small Group Research, 25, 294–315.
27.
JarvenpaaS. L.LeidnerD. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791–815.
28.
JonesG. R.GeorgeJ. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23, 531–546.
29.
KleinG.MillerT. E. (1999). Distributed planning teams. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 3, 203–222.
30.
LevineJ. M.BogartL. M.ZdaniukB. (1996). Impact of anticipated group membership on cognition. In SorrentinoR. M.HigginsE. T.Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context, (Vol. 3, pp. 531–569). New York: The Guilford Press.
31.
LiangD.MorelandR.ArgoteL. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating factor of transactive memory. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384–393.
32.
LogieR. H.GilhoolyR. H. (1998). Working memory and thinking: Current issues in thinking & reasoning. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
33.
MiyakeA.ShahP. (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Press.
34.
MorelandR. L.MyaskovskyL. (2000). Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 82, 117–133
35.
MuehlbachLBoeckerM.PrussogA. (1995). Telepresence in video communications: A study of stereoscopy and individual eye contact. Human Factors, 37, 290–305.
36.
MullenB.CopperC. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210–227.
37.
RoccoE. (1998). Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact. Proceedings of CSCW '98 (Seattle WA, November, 1998), ACM Press, New York, 501–529.
38.
RouseW. B.Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE. (1992). The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 1296–1308.
39.
SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ. A. (2000). The anatomy of team training. In TobiasS.FletcherJ. D.Training and Retraining: A handbook for business, industry, government, and the military (pp. 312–335). New York: Macmillan Reference.
40.
SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ. A.FioreS. M.StoutR. J. (2001). Cue-recognition training to enhance team situation awareness. In McNeeseM.SalasE.EndsleyM.New trends in collaborative activities: Understanding system dynamics in complex environments (pp. 169–190). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
41.
SalasE.RozellD.MullenB.DriskellJ. E. (1999). The effect of team building on performance: An integration. Small Group Research, 30, 309–329.
42.
Smith-JentschK. A.ZeisigR. L.ActonB.McPhersonJ. A. (1998). Team dimensional training: A strategy for guided team self-correction. In Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE.Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 271–297). Washington, DC: APA.
43.
SteinerI. D. (1972). Group processes and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
44.
UrbanJ. M.WeaverJ. L.BowersC. A.RhodenizerL. (1996). Effects of workload and structure on team processes and performance: Implications for complex team decision making. Human Factors, 38, 300–310.
45.
WegnerD. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In MullenB.GoethalsG. R.Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
46.
WittenbaumG. M.VaughanS. I.StasserG. (1998). Coordination in task-performing groups. In TindaleR. S.HeathL.Theory and research on small groups. Social psychological applications to social issues, Vol. 4 (pp. 177–204). New York: Plenum Press.
