Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study is aimed at answering whether aging/health-related web sites of different domain extensions (i.e. .com, .edu, .gov and .org) differ in their accessibility and usability, and whether these two measures are correlated. The usability and accessibility of governmental, organizational, educational and commercial aging/health-related web sites were compared using two automatic evaluation tools: Bobby and LIFT. The governmental web site group has the highest compliance with Web site Content Accessibility Guide although only 52% got an approved status. The accessibility approval was found to correlate significantly with overall usability ratings for all groups, except the commercial web site group.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bloom

B. S.

Iannacone

R. C.

(1999). Internet availability of prescription pharmaceuticals to the public. Annual Intern Medicines, 131(11), 830–833.

Chi-Lum

(1999). Friend or foe? Consumers using the Internet for medical information. Journal of Medical Practise Management 14(4), 196–198.

Cochrane

J. D.

(1999). Healthcare @ the speed of thought. Integrated Healthcare Reports, May 1st 16–17.

Cury

J. O.

(2001). Young at heart, and online: The over-50 crowd finds empowerment, community and new friends on the Web [On-Line]. Available:http://www.buyingarizona.com/senior_source.html.

Dakins

D. R.

(1999). Web-savvy patients may know more than you think they do. Diagnosis Imaging 21(11), 63–66.

Eder

L. B.

Darter

M. E.

(1998). Physicians in Cyberspace. Communications of the ACM, 41(3), 52–54.

Elliott

(2000). High volume medical websites. Delaware Medical Journal, 72(1), 21–29.

Hersh

(1999). “A world of knowledge at your fingertips”: the promise, reality, and future directions of on-line information retrieval. Academic Medicines, 74(3), 240–243.

Ling

C. A.

(1999). Guiding patients through the maze of drug information on the Internet. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 56(3), 212–214.

10.

Mead

S. E.

Spaulding

V. A.

Sit

R. A.

Meyer

Walker

(1997). Effects of age and training on World Wide Web navigation strategies. Proceedings of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting (pp. 152–156). Albuquerque, NM: HFES.

11.

Newell

A. F.

Gregor

(1997). Human Computer Interfaces for People with Disabilities. In Helander

Landauer

T.K.

Prabhu

Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd ed. Elsevier Science B.V, 813–826.

12.

Sullivan

Matson

(2000). Barriers to Use: Usability and Content Accessibility on the Web's Most Popular Sites. Proceedings of the Conference of Universal Usability. Arlington, VA: ACM.

13.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Projections of the Total Resident Population by 5-Year Age Groups, and Sex with Special Age Categories: Middle Series, 2025 to 2045 [On-Line]. Available: http://www.census.gov/population/projections/nation/summary/np-t3-f.txt.

14.

Weber

D. O.

(1999). Web Sites of Tomorrow: How the Internet will transform health. Health Forum Journal, May-June 40–45.

15.

White

McConnell

Clipp

Bynum

Teague

Navas

Craven

Halbrecht

(1999). Surfing the net in later life: A review of the literature and pilot study of computer use and quality of life. The Journal of Applied Gerontology 18(3), 358–378.

16.

Zaphiris

(2000) Depth Vs Breadth in the Arrangement of Web Links, in Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES. San Diego, California, USA, August 2000.

Usability and Accessibility Comparison of Governmental,Organizational,Educational and Commercial Aging/Health-Related Web Sites

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References