Cockpit Display of Traffic Information: The Effects of Traffic Load,Dimensionality,and Vertical Profile Orientation

Abstract

Eighteen certified flight instructors from the University of Illinois Institute of Aviation participated in an experiment exploring the design of the Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI) for free flight. Pilots flew a sequence of flight scenarios to compare the effects of traffic load, dimensionality, and a vertical profile orientation on maneuver frequency, safety, and maneuver efficiency. Climbs and descents were found to be more frequent than other maneuvers. Both the rear-view and 3D displays were safer in terms of predicted conflict avoidance than the side-view display. Climbing maneuvers were more safely implemented with the rear-view and 3D displays than with the side-view display. The lateral efficiency of climbing maneuvers was highest with the rear-view display. Altitude maintenance of lateral/vertical maneuvers was highest with the side-view, then the rear-view, and then lowest with the 3D display. Airspeed efficiency of airspeed maneuvers was highest with the rear-view display. These findings suggest that a rear-view coplanar CDTI may be preferable to either a side-view coplanar or 3D display.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boyer

Campbell

May

Merwin

Wickens

C.D.

(1995). Three-dimensional displays for terrain and weather awareness in the national airspace system. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39^th Annual Meeting (pp. 6–10). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.

DeJonge

(2000). Displaying the FMS vertical profile. In Proceedings of the 2000 World Aviation Conference (2000-01-5615). Anaheim, CA.

Ellis

S.R.

McGreevy

M.W.

Hitchcock

R.J.

(1987). Perspective traffic display format and airline pilot traffic avoidance Human Factors, 29, 371–382.

Johnson

W.W.

Battiste

Bochow

S.H.

(1999). A cockpit display designed to enable limited flight deck separation responsibility. In Proceedings of the 1999 World Aviation Conference (1999-01-5567). Anaheim, CA.

Kreifeldt

J.G.

(1980). Cockpit displayed traffic information and distributed management in air traffic control Human Factors, 22(6), 671–691).

May

P.A.

Campbell

Wickens

CD.

(1995). Perspective displays for air traffic control: Display of terrain and weather Air Traffic Quarterly, 3, 1–17.

McGreevy

M.W.

Ellis

S.R.

(1986). The effect of perspective geometry on judged direction in spatial information instruments Human Factors, 28, 439–456.

Merwin

D.H.

Wickens

C.D.

O'Brien

J.V.

(1997). Display format-induced biases in air traffic avoidance behavior. Proceedings of the World Aviation Congress (98WAC-71). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.

Olmos

Wickens

C.D.

Chudy

(2000). Tactical displays for combat awareness: An examination of dimensionality and frame of reference concepts and the application of cognitive engineering The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10, 247–271.

10.

Oman

Kendra

Hayashi

Stearns

Burki-Cohen

(2001). Vertical navigation displays: Pilot performance and workload during simulated constant angle descent GPS approaches international Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11, 15–32.

11.

Shelden

Belcher

(1999). Cockpit traffic displays of tomorrow Ergonomics in Design, 7, 4–9.

12.

Wickens

C.D.

Helleberg

(1999). Maneuver choice in free flight. Proceedings of the 1999 World Aviation Conference (1999-01-5591). Anaheim, CA.

13.

Wickens

C.D.

Mavor

A.S.

Parasuraman

McGee

(1998). Airspace system integration: The concept of free flight. In The future of air traffic control. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

14.

Wickens

C.D.

Merwin

D.H.

Lin

(1994). Implications of graphics enhancements for the visualization of scientific data: Dimensional integrality, stereopsis, motion, and mesh Human Factors, 36, 44–61.

15.

Wickens

C.D.

Miller

Tham

(1996). The implications of data-link for representing pilot request information on 2D and 3D air traffic control displays International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 18, 283–293.