Reliability (dispersion in measurement repetition) and validity (deviation from an adopted reference) are confusing concepts, regularly inadequately specified in Ergonomics/Human Factors (E/HF) research papers. The application of each is at odds with the interactiveness of measured/observed human phenomena. The more relevant research is for supporting usage oriented design, the less significant reliability and validity are as <hard>, positivistic research criteria.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CarminesE.G.ZellerR.A. (1987). Reliability and Validity. Sage. ISO 5725 (1994). Accuracy (triteness and precision) of measurement and results, International Standard Organisation, Geneva.
2.
KanisH. (1997a). Variation in measurement repetition of human characteristics and activities. Applied Ergonomics, 28, 155–163.
3.
KanisH. (1997b). Validity as Panacea?IEA-proceedings, volume 7 (pp.234–237). Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.
4.
KanisH.GreenW.S. (2000). Research for usage oriented design: Quantitative? Qualitative?IEA-HFES Proceedings (this issue).
MurphyE.DingwallR.GreatbachD.ParkerS.WatsonP. (1998). Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. University of Nottingham.
7.
PawsonR. (1989). A Measure for Measures: A manifesto for Empirical Sociology. Routledge.
8.
RoodenM.J. (1999). Prototypes on trial. In Product Design and usability – Current Practice and Future Trends (138–150). Taylor & Francis.
9.
RoodenM.J.GreenW.S.KanisH. (1999). Difficulties in usage of a coffee maker predicted on the basis of design models. Proceedings HFES Annual Meeting (pp. 476–480).
10.
SilvermanD. (1997). The Logics of Qualitative Research. In Context and Method in Qualitative Research, 12–25. Sage.
11.
StantonN.A.YoungM.S. (1999). What price Ergonomics?Nature, 399, 197–198.
