Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The ergonomics and design disciplines, together with technology have continued to produce complex systems and equipment that are more compatible to the abilities of its users. The human-machine system which is firmly rooted in ergonomics implies an interdisciplinary “science-design paradigm” for the ergonomic design of systems and equipment. This paper argues that the human-machine paradigm that underpins fundamental ergonomics principles and system theory for equipment design is incongruous to the design process at the cognitive, process and practical levels. Some of the major problems and conflicts encountered by product designers in the application of ergonomics data in the design process and the incompatibilities between the scientific methods of ergonomics and the subjective methods of design are discussed. A paradigm shift to a design-led approach for equipment design is proposed along with case studies (presented at the Congress), to demonstrate the nature and effectiveness of the new quasi-science paradigm.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

Poyner

(1996). The Atoms of Environmental Structure. Ministry of Public Building and Works Research and Development Paper, 1996, in Cross

Nigel

(Editor) Developments in Design Methodology. John Wiley Chicheter, 1984.

Broadbent

(1979). The Development of Design Methods. Design Methods and Theories, 13(1) (1979), 41–5.

Buchanan

(1996). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking, in The Idea of Design. The MIT Press.

Buchanan Retoric

, Humanism, and Design in Buchanan and Morgolin (Editors) Discovering Design 24.

Burkhardt

(1986). Tendencies of the German Design Theories in the Past Fifteen Years. Design Issues Vol. 3, no.2. pp31–36.

Chapanis

(1995). Ergonomics in Product Development. A Personal View. Ergonomics, Vol. 38, no.8, 1625–1638.

Cross

(1984). (Editor). Development in Design Methodology. John Wiley & Sons.

Culvahouse

(1999). Hello…. Is Anybody Out There? Harvard Design Magazine, Fall 1999, pp84–88.

Hendrick

Hal W.

(1995). Future Directions in Macroergonomics. Ergonomics, 1995, Vol. 38, no.8, 1617–1624.

10.

Hutchingson

Dale R.

(1981). New Horizons For Human Factors in Design. McGraw-hill Book Company.

11.

Kuhn

Thomas S.

(1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Second Edition, University of Chichage Press Chicago.

12.

Margolin

(1989). (Editor). Design Discourse. The University of Chicago Press Chicago.

13.

Popper

Karl R.

(1965). Conjecture and Refulation: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Second Edition, Harper Torchbooks New York.

14.

Rittel

Horst W. J.

Webber

Melvin M.

(1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Science, Vol. 4, pp155–169.

15.

Roozenburg

(1996). Editorial, Design Studies, Vol. 17, no.3. pp233.

16.

Simon

Herbert A.

, (1973). The Structure of Ill-Structured Problems. Reprinted from Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 4, pp181–200, 1973, in Nigel

Cross

(Editor) Development in Design Methodology. John Wiley, Chicheter, 1984.

17.

Van Cott (1971). Source unknown.

The Human-Machine Paradigm Paradox and Limitations in Equipment Design

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References