In a study of “comfortable” head/neck posture in the absence of a visual target for 24 seated subjects, mean head tilt (Ear-Eye Line) angle was 7.7° above horizontal, and mean head/neck posture (C7-tragus against vertical) was 43.7°. Using these and other studies' findings as reference points for “neutral,” studies examining posture at different computer monitor heights were reviewed: eye-level monitors resulted in head/neck extension.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnkrumD. R. (1997). A challenge to eye-level, perpendicular-to-gaze, monitor placement. In Proceedings of the 13th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (vol. 5, pp. 35–38). Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.
2.
ChaffinD. B. (1973). Localized muscle fatigue - definition and measurement. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 15, 346–354.
3.
GreyF. E.HansonJ. A.JonesF. P. (1966). Postural Aspects of Neck Muscle Tension. Ergonomics, 9 (3), 245–256.
4.
HillS. G.KroemerK. H. E. (1986). Preferred Declination of the Line of Sight. Human Factors, 28 (2), 127–134.
5.
HsiaoH.KeyserlingW. M. (1991). Evaluating posture behavior during seated tasks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 8, 313–334.
6.
JampelR. S.ShiD. X. (1992). The Primary position of the eyes, the resetting saccade, and the transverse visual head plane. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 33, 2501–2510.
7.
JohnsonG. M. (1998). The Correlation Between Surface Measurement of Head and Neck Posture and the Anatomic Position of the Upper Cervical Vertebrae. Spine, 23 (8), 921–27.
8.
McAtamneyL.CorlettE. N. (1993). RULA: A survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Applied Ergonomics, 24 (2), 91–99.
9.
RaineS.TwomeyL. T. (1997). Head and Shoulder Posture Variations in 160 Asymptomatic Women and Men. Archives of Physiological Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 1215–1256.
10.
SommerichC. M.JoinesM. B.PsihogiosJ. P. (1998). Effects of VDT Viewing on User Biomechanics, Comfort, and Preference. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 861–865). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
11.
ThorntonW. (1978). Anthropometric changes in weightlessness. In Anthropology research staff, Anthropometric source book, vol. I: Anthropometry for designers (NASA RP-1024). Houston: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
12.
TurvilleK. L.PsihogiosJ. P.UlmerT. R.MirkaG. A. (1998). The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: A comparison of the 15° and 40° recommendations. Applied Ergonomics, 29 (4), 239–246.
13.
VillanuevaM. B. G.SotoyamaM.JonaiH.TakeuchiY.SaitoS. (1996). Adjustment of posture and viewing parameters of the eye to changes in screen height of the visual display terminal, Ergonomics, 39 (7), 933–945.
