Questions to ask When Interpreting Surface Electromyography (SEMG) Research

Abstract

Surface electromyography (SEMG) is widely used to evaluate muscle activity. In SEMG, researchers attach electrodes to the surface of the skin overlying a muscle and measure the amount of electricity it produces as muscle fibers contract. SEMG can determine which muscles are active, their degree of activity, and how active the muscle is compared to the subject's capacity. It can also be used to estimate muscle force. Properly employed, SEMG assists in evaluating the relative risk of a work task. As articles reporting SEMG results are often used by ergonomics practitioners as guidance in job design, the ability to interpret SEMG research is critical. Problems occur when researchers assume their readers have a greater familiarity with SEMG than actually exists, or when they make any of a number of SEMG-related research or interpretation errors. This paper suggests some questions that should be asked when evaluating a study that reports SEMG data.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaras

(1994). Relationship between trapezius load and the incidence of musculoskeletal illness in the neck and shoulder. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 14, 341–348.

Hagg

G. M.

(1991). Static Work Loads and Occupational Myalgia - a New Explanation model. In Anderson

P. A.

Hobart

D. J.

Danoff

J. V.

, Electromyographical Kinesiology (pp. 141–144). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Hagg

G. M.

Kadefors

(1996). EMG Alterations at Sustained Contractions with Special Emphasis on Applications. In Kumar

Mital

, Electromyography in Ergonomics (pp. 163–181). London: Taylor and Francis.

Jonsson

(1978). Kinesiology: With special reverence to electromyographic kinesiology. In Cobb

W. A.

Van Duijn

, Contemporary Clinical Neurophysiology (EEG Suppl. No. 34) (pp. 417–428). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Marras

(1990). Guidelines: Industrial electromyography. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 6, 89–93.

Solomonow

(1999). Standards For Reporting EMG Data. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 9, 410–412.

Redfern

(1992). Functional Muscle: Effects on Electromyographic Output. In Soderberg

G. L.

, Selected Topics in Surface Electromyography for Use in the Occupational Setting: Expert Perspectives (pp. 104–120). Cincinnati: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Veiersted

K. B.

Westgaard

R. H.

Anderson

(1993). Electromyographic evaluation of muscular work pattern as a predictor of trapezius myalgia. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 19, 284–90.