Comparative Analysis of Functional Wrist Brace and Wrist Angle on Maximal Grasp Strength

Abstract

Wrist braces have been used in the industry with the notion that they would restrict the range of motion of the wrist to an extent that it would decrease the risk of CTS during forceful repetitive tasks and enhance productivity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the functional wrist brace, wrist angle, and fatigue on maximal grasp strength. Fourteen male and sixteen female college students participated in the study utilizing a soft brace, a hard brace, and no brace in three different static wrist positions (45° flexion, neutral, and 45° extension) prior to and after fatigue to determine the effect on maximal grasp strength measured by a computerized wrist dynamometer. The results of the ANOVA indicated that grasp strength was significantly greater when the wrist was in the flexion position followed by neutral, then wrist extension. However, brace type and fatigue states did not produce statistically significantly different grasp strengths overall. Therefore, the position a grasping task is performed at should be evaluated keeping in mind that the neutral and flexion positions allow for the greatest maximal grasp force with or without a wrist brace. Wrist braces are not recommended as a preventative or protective device during forceful repetitive tasks but the effects of their usage on maximal grasp strength must be evaluated with special consideration of the post-fatigue state.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hallbeck

M.S.

, (1994). Flexion and extension forces generated by wrist-dedicated muscles over the range of motion, Applied Ergonomics, 25(6), 379–385.

Jansen

C.W.

Olson

S.L.

Hasson

S.M.

(1997). The effect of use of a wrist orthosis during functional activities on surface electromyography of the wrist extensors in normal subjects, Journal of Hand Therapy, Oct.-Dec., 10(4), 283–289.

Kjeken

Moller

Kvien

T.K.

(1995). Use of commercially produced elastic wrist orthoses in chronic arthritis: A controlled study, Arthritis Care and Research, Jun., 8(2), 108–113.

Miller

Wells

, (1998). The influence of wrist flexion, wrist deviation and forearm pronation on pinch and power grasp strength, Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario.

Perez-Balke

Buchholz

B.O.

(1994). A study of the effect of a “resting splint” on peak grip strength, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, 544–548.

Silverstein

B.A.

Fine

L.J.

Armstrong

T.J.

(1986). Hand wrist cumulative trauma disorders in industry, British Journal of Injustrial Medicine, 43, 779–784.

Snook

S.H.

Vailancourt

D.R.

Cirello

V.M.

Webster

B.S.

(1995). Psychophysical studies of repetitive wrist flexion and extension, Ergonomics, 38(7), 1488–1507.

Stern

E.B.

Sines

Teague

T.R.

(1994). Commercial wrist extensor orthoses: Hand function, comfort, and interference across five styles, Journal of Hand Therapy, Oct.-Dec., 237–244.

Stern

E.B.

Ytterberg

S.R.

Krug

H.E.

Mullin

G.T.

Mahowald

M.L.

(1996). Immediate and short-term effects of three commercial wrist extensor orthoses on grip strength and function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Arthritis Care and Research, Feb., 9(1), 42–50.

10.

Wilhelm

G.A.

Hallbeck

M.S.

(1997). The effects of gender, wrist position, exertion direction, angular Velocity, and simultaneous hand grasp on isokinetic wrist torque. Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, Volume 4, 126–128.

11.

Zellers

K.K.

Hallbeck

M.S.

(1995). The effects of gender, wrist and forearm position on maximum isometric power grasp force, wrist force, and their interactions, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, 543–547.