Some Medical Issues and Technologies for Preserving Human Performance during Long-Duration Spaceflight

Abstract

This panel presentation will highlight several of the crucial areas that impact astronauts' ability to carry out mission tasks during long-duration spaceflight. We review some of the physiologic changes which occur during long-duration spaceflight, highlight how those changes may impact human performance, and note some of the technologies and countermeasures that will be required to combat these deleterious effects. As the missions become longer, medical and psychosocial/group dynamics issues become increasing important as potential “trouble spots” for disrupting mission operations. These important attributes that relate to human performance must be considered by mission architects, management, ground controllers and the astronauts themselves for safe, effective long-duration mission completion. An integrated systems engineering approach is urged as an important conceptual framework for addressing how to apply a wide variety of new medical, telemedicine, and informatics technologies to the various challenges that will be posed on long-duration spaceflight missions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Conners

Harrison

Akins

(1985). Living Aloft: Human Requirements for Extended Spaceflight. NASA SP-483.

Ellis

(2000, Jan). Human factors elements of the MIR-Progress 234 collision. Ergonomics in Design. Human Factors Society.

Guidi

Holland

D.A.

(1992). Operational and human factors implications of physiological deconditioning during long duration spaceflight. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 36th Annual Meeting (pp 116–120). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Holland

A. W.

(2000). Psychology of spaceflight. In Larson Pranke Human Space Flight: Mission Analysis and Design (pp 155 – 191). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Holland

D.A.

(1991). Systems and Human Factors Concerns for Long-Duration Spaceflight. Master's Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Holland

D.A.

Barfield

W.W.

(1999). Some virtual reality and telemedicine applications useful for long-duration spaceflight from a systems engineering perspective. In Westwood

Hoffman

Robb Stredney Medicine Meets Virtual Reality (pp 141–147). Washington, DC: IOS Press.

Hunt

S. R.

(1987). Human engineering for space. In Salvendy

Handbook of Human Factors. New York: Wiley and Sons.

Jenkens

J.P.

(1992). Human Performance for Long Duration Space Missions. A report of the SSTAC ad hoc committee on human performance for long duration space missions. NASA Headquarters.

Johnston

S.L.

et al. (1999). NASA international space station (ISS) crew return vehicle (CRV) seat, cockpit configuration, and design challenges. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 70, 359.

10.

Kanas

(1987). Psychological and interpersonal issues in space. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 703–709.

11.

Kanas

, et al. (1999). Crewmember interactions during joint US/Russian Mir missions (two panels with a series of studies on this topic). Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 70, 382–383.

12.

Lozano

M.L.

Wong

C. K.

(1995). Multicultural human factors concerns aboard the international space station alpha. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting (pp 912–916). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

13.

Muccio

J.D.

Holland

D.A.

(1999). Potential risk and countermeasures for a fracture after a long-duration spaceflight using osteoporosis data as a risk-assessment model. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 70, 359.

14.

Nicogossian

A. E.

Pool

S.L.

(1999). Space Physiology and Medicine. Philadelphia: Lea.