Many household products are associated with several safety hazards ranging from minimal to severe and life threatening. Several household products were surveyed to determine conformity of labels to principles known to enhance warning label effectiveness and to determine consumer knowledge of product hazards identified by experts to be unfamiliar to consumers. Most product labels did not apply signal word/background color principles or symbols/pictorials, which are features known to facilitate attention capture, comprehension, and compliance. Although point biserial correlations were significant for the relationship between product usage and accuracy of reporting product hazards, consumers had little overall knowledge of the specific hazards in question. Implications for household product label design are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsA.S.EdworthyJ. (1995). Quantifying and predicting the effects of basic text display variables on the perceived urgency of warning labels: Tradeoffs involving font size, border weight and color. Ergonomics, 38, 2221–2237.
2.
American National Standards Institue (1998). ANSI Z535 series. Rosslyn, VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association.
3.
BraunC.C.SilverN.C. (1995). Interaction of signal word and colour on warning labels: Differences in perceived hazard and behavioral compliance. Ergonomics, 38, 2207–2220.
4.
BraunC.C.HoltR.S.SilverN.C. (1995). Adding consequence information to product instructions: Changes in hazard perceptions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting (346–350). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
5.
ChapanisA. (1994). Hazards associated with three signal words and four colours on warning signs. Ergonomics, 37, 265–275.
6.
CheathamD.B.WogalterM.S. (1999). Connoted hazard and perceived conspicuity of warning configurations. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting (883–887). Santa Monica, CA:Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
7.
DasR.BlancP.D. (1993). Chlorine gas exposure and the lung: A review. Toxicology and Industrial Health, 9, 439–455.
8.
DrakeK.S.ConzolaV.C.WogalterM.S. (1998). Discrimination among sign and label warning signal words. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 3, 289–301.
9.
GodfreyS.S.LaugheryK.R. (1984). The biasing effect of product familiarity on consumers' awareness of hazard. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 28th Annual Meeting (483–486). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
HammondA.J. (1995). Adult notions of adults' and children's perceptions of consumer product risk. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting (321–325). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
12.
LaugheryK.R.YoungK.P.VaubelK.P.BrelsfordJ.W.RoweA.L. (1993). The noticeability of warnings onalcoholic beverage containers. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 12, 38–56.
13.
LaugheryK.R.WogalterMS. (1997). Warnings and risk perception. In SalvendyG.. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
14.
LeonardS.D.WogalterM.S.GriffinR.S. (1998). What you don't know can hurt you: Household products and events. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (321–325). Santa Monica, CA:Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
15.
MrvosR.DeanB.S.KrenzelokE.P. (1993). Home exposures to chlorine/chloramine gas: Review of 216 cases. Southern Medical Journal, 86, 654–657.
16.
OlcerstR. (1999). “Use in well-ventilated area”? American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 60, 377–383.
17.
RacioppiF.DaskalerosP.A.BesbelliN.BorgesA.DeraemaekerC.MagalineS.I.ArrietaR.M.PulceC.RuggeroneM.L.VlachosP. (1994). Food and Chemical Toxicology, 32, 845–863.
SojournerR.J.WogalterM.S. (1998). The influence of pictorials on the comprehension and recall of pharmaceutical safety and warning information. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 2, 93–106.
20.
TanenD.A.GraemeK.A.RaschkeR. (1999). Severe lung injury after exposure to chloramines gas from household cleaners. New England Journal of Medicine, 341, 848–849.
WogalterM.S.DesaulniersD.R.BrelsfordJ.W. (1993). Consumer products: How are the hazards perceived? In LaugheryK.R.Sr.WogalterM.S.YoungS.L.. Human Factors Perspectives on Warnings. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
23.
WogalterM.S.KalsherM.RashidR. (1998). Effect of signal word and source attribution on judgments of warning credibility and compliance likelihood. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1–8.
24.
WogalterM.S.RacicotB.M.KalsherM.J.SimpsonS.N. (1994). Personalization of warning signs: The role of perceived relevance on behavioral compliance. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 14, 233–242.
25.
WogalterM.S.SilverN.C. (1990). Arousal strength of signal words. Forensic Reports, 3, 407–420.
26.
WogalterM.S.SilverN.C. (1995). Warning signal words: Connoted strength and understandability by children, elders, and non-native English speakers. Ergonomics, 38, 2188–2206.
27.
WogalterM.S.GodfreyS.S.FontenelleG.A.DesaulniersD.R.RosthsteinP.R.LaugheryK.R. (1987). Effectiveness of warnings. Human Factors29, 599–612.
28.
WogalterM.S.MagurnoA.B.RashidR.KleinK.W. (1998). The influence of time stress and location on behavioral warning compliance. Safety Science, 29, 2, 143–148.
29.
YoungS. (1997). The role of pictorials in environmental safety signs. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting (797–805). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
30.
ZeitlinL.R. (1994). Failure to follow safety instructions: Faulty communication or risky decisions? Human Factors, 36, 172–181.
