Automatic Speech Recognition,Noise and Workload

Abstract

Despite the increasing use of technology in the developed world, most computer communications still take place via a QWERTY keyboard and a mouse. The use of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) whereby individuals can ‘talk’ to their computers has yet to be realised to any great extent. This is despite the benefits relating to greater efficiency, use in adverse environments and in the ‘hands-eyes busy’ situation. There are now affordable ASR products in the marketplace, and many people are able to buy these products and try ASR for themselves. However, anecdotal reports suggest that these same people will use ASR for a few days or weeks and then revert to conventional interaction techniques; only a hardy few appear to persist long enough to reap the benefits. Thus, it is our contention that ASR is a commercially viable technology but that it still requires further development to make a significant contribution to usability. Admittedly, there are some very successful applications that have used ASR for a number of decades, but these are often characterised by relatively small vocabularies, dedicated users and non-threatening situations; typical applications are in offices (Noyes & Frankish, 1989) or for disabled users (Noyes & Frankish, 1992). Given that Armoured Fighting Vehicles (AFVs) could employ ASR with limited vocabulary and dedicated users, the use of ASR in this application is considered here. The principle difference between ASR for AFV and previous applications is the environmental conditions in which the technology will be used.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baber

(1991). Speech technology in control room systems: A human factors perspective. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.

Baber

Mellor

Graham

Noyes

J.M.

Tunley

(1996). Workload and the use of Automatic Speech Recognition: The effects of time and resource demands. Speech Communication, 20, 37–53.

Baber

Noyes

J.M.

(1996). Automatic Speech Recognition in adverse environments. Human Factors, 38(1), 142–155.

Baber

Siddell

(1999). The effects of combined stressors on the production of speech, In Proceedings of Engineering Psychology & Cognitive Ergonomics edited by Harris

(pp. 263–269). Aldershot: Avebury.

Lane

H.L.

Tranel

Sisson

(1970). Regulation of voice communication by sensory dynamics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 47, 618–624.

Lea

W.A.

(1980). Speech recognition: Past, present and future. In Trends in speech recognition edited by Lea

W.A.

(Volume 4, pp. 39–98). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Leggatt

A.P.

Noyes

J.M.

(in press for April 2000). Navigation aids: Effects on crew workload and performance. Military Psychology, 12(2).

Martin

T.B.

(1976). Practical application of voice input to machines. Proceedings of IEEE, 64(4), 487–501.

Noyes

J.M.

Frankish

C.R.

(1989). A review of speech recognition applications in the office. Behaviour & Information Technology, 8(6), 475–486.

10.

Noyes

J.M.

Frankish

C.R.

(1992). Speech recognition technology for individuals with disabilities. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 8(4), 297–303.

11.

Rajaskaran

P.K.

Doddington

G.R.

Picone

J.W.

(1986). Recognition of speech under stress. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing (pp. 733–736). New York: IEEE.