Texture Density Effects on Accuracy of Control of Egospeed are Nonlinear

Abstract

Knowledge of how the visual system determines the speed of self-motion is necessary for the design of virtual displays that will enhance accurate perception and control of airspeed, lower the incidence of loss of situational awareness and increase pilot performance. Changes in texture density have been shown to bias the perceived speed of moving 2D patterns (Watamaniuk, Grzywacz, & Yuille, 1993) and 3D self-motion or egospeed (Dyre, 1997; Ballard, Roach, and Dyre, 1998), suggesting that visual motion channels that code speed are also sensitive to changes in texture density. This study examined the relationship between display density and performance on a speed control task over a wide range of densities. Observers attempted to maintain constant speed while countering a simulated fore-aft wind disturbance. Overall, participants tended to increase speed (positive errors) over the trial duration for every condition. However, moderate densities produced less error than higher or lower densities. Precision of egospeed control was not affected by variations in density. These results show that texture density is an important parameter to consider in designing virtual displays and that moderate texture density levels may be the most effective for supporting control of speed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cox

E. M.

Dyre

B. P.

, (1999). Control of egospeed: Influence of discontinuity rate and global optical flow rate. Proceeding of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting. Houston, TX: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Barlow

H. B.

Hill

R. M.

(1963). Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall illusion and figural aftereffects. Nature, 200, 1345–1347.

Dyre

B. P.

(1997). Perception of accelerating self-motion: Global optical flow rate dominates discontinuity rate. Proceedings of the 41^st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2, 1333–1337. Albuquerque, NM: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Ballard

T. G.

Roach

Dyre

B. P.

(1998). Use of global optical flow rate depends on their validity as determinants of egospeed. Proceedings of the 42^nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2, (pp. 1540–1544). Chicago, IL: Human Factors and Ergonomic Society.

Eagle

R. A.

Rogers

B. J.

(1996). Motion detection is limited by element density not spatial frequency. Vision Research, 36 (4), 545–558.

FSF Icarus Committee (1999). The dollars and sense of risk management and airline safety. Flight Safety Digest, 18 (5), 9–14.

Hallett

(1991). Some limitations to human peripheral vision. In Cronly-Dillon

(Ed.) Limits of Vision. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Hershenson

(1989). Duration, time constant, and decay of the linear motion aftereffect as a function of inspection duration. Perception and Psychphysics, 45, 251–257.

Larish

J. F.

Flach

J. M.

(1990). Sources of optical information useful for perception of speed of rectilinear self-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 529–532.

10.

Roscoe

(1980). Aviation Psychology. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

11.

Schrater

P. R.

Simoncelli

E. P.

(1998). Local velocity representation: Evidence from motion adaptation. Vision Research, 38 (24), 3899–3912.

12.

Thompson

(1981). Velocity aftereffects: The effects of adaptation to moving stimuli on the perception of subsequently seen moving stimuli. Vision Research, 21, 337–380.

13.

Watamaniuk

S. N.

Grzywacz

N. M.

(1993). Dependence of speed and direction perception on cinematogram dot density. Vision Research 33(5–6): 849–859.

14.

Wickens

D. W.

Hollands

J. G.

(1999). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

15.

Williams

D. W.

Sekuler

(1984). Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions. Vision Research 24(1): 55–62.

16.

Yuille

A. L.

Grzywacz

N.M.

(1988). A computational theory for the perception of coherent visual motion. Nature, 333, 71–74.

17.

Yuille

A. L.

Grzywacz

N.M.

(1989). A mathematical analysis of the motion coherence theory. International journal of Computer Vision, 3, 155–175.