Effects of Signal Salience and Cueing on Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity during Sustained Attention

Abstract

Transcranial Doppler sonography*** a low-cost noninvasive procedure which allows continuous monitoring of blood flow in the left and right middle cerebral arteries, was employed while participants performed a 40-min vigil. Two levels of signal salience (high and low) were combined factorially with four conditions in which monitors were forewarned about the imminent arrival of critical signals (100%, 80%, and 40% reliable cueing and a no-cue control). For both levels of signal salience, the frequency of signal detections remained stable over time in the 100% cue-reliability condition but declined over time in the remaining cue conditions, so that by the end of the vigil performance efficiency was best in the 100% condition followed in order by the 80%, 40%, and no-cue conditions. These performance effects for cueing were mirrored by blood flow measurements taken from the right hemisphere in conjunction with low salience signals. No effects for cueing were observable in blood flow recordings taken from the left hemisphere in conjunction with either high or low salience signals. The results indicate that blood flow and signal detection in vigilance are at least partially related to common mechanisms, such as the expenditure of information-processing resources. They are also consistent with past findings indicating that vigilance performance is right-lateralized.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaslid

(1986). Transcranial Doppler examination techniques. In Aaslid

, (Ed.), Transcranial Doppler sonography (pp. 39–59). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Hitchcock

E.M.

Dember

W.N.

Warm

J.S.

Moroney

B.W.

See

J.E.

(1999). Effects of cueing and knowledge of results on workload and boredom in sustained attention. Human Factors, 41, 365–372.

Mayleben

(1998). Cerebral blood flow during sustained attention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

Parasuraman

Davies

D.R.

(1977). A taxonomic analysis of vigilance. In Mackie

, (Ed., Vigilance: Theory, operational performance, and physiological correlates (pp.559–574). New York: Plenum.

Parasuraman

Warm

J.S.

Dember

W. N.

(1987). Vigilance: Taxonomy and utility. In Mark

L. S.

Warm

J. S.

Huston

R. L.

(Eds.), Ergonomics and human factors: Recent research (pp. 11–32). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Parasuraman

Warm

J.S.

See

J. E.

(1998). Brain systems of vigilance. In Parasuraman

(Ed.), The attentive brain (pp. 221–256). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Paus

Zatorre

R. J.

Hofle

Caramanos

Gotman

Petrides

Evans

(1997). Time related changes in neural systems underlying attention and arousal during the performance of an auditory vigilance task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 93, 92–408.

Warm

J.S.

Dember

W.N.

(1998). Tests of a vigilance taxonomy. In Hoffman

R.R.

Sherrick

Warm

J. S.

(Eds.), Viewing psychology as a whole: The integrative science of William N. Dember (pp. 87–112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Warm

J.S.

Jerison (1984). The psychophysics of sustained attention. In: Warm

J. S.

(Ed.) Sustained attention in human performance, (pp. 15–59). Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley.

10.

Warm

J.S.

Richter

D.O.

Sprague

R.L.

Porter

P.K.

Schumsky

D.A.

(1980). Listening with a dual brain: Hemispheric asymmetry and temporal uncertainty in sustained attention. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 413–416.