Data from studies on real-world groups situated in extreme environments provides us insight into the many factors that impact group performance, health and well-being. Unlike simulation studies, the impact of environmental threat, physical hardship, as well as true isolation and confinement have proven to be key factors in individual and group coping. Results from several real world teams will be discussed with the intent of focusing on interpersonal, environmental and individual factors that affected functioning and well-being at both the physiological and psychological levels.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltmanI., The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding, 1975. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
2.
FreedmanJ. L., Crowding and Behavior, 1975. New York: Viking.
3.
FousheeH. C.HelmreichR. L.Group interaction and flightcrew performance. 1988 In WernerE. L.NagalD. C., Human Factors in Aviation, New York: Academic.
4.
HeslegraveR. J.ColvinC., Selection of personnel for stressful occupations: The potential utility of psychophysiological measures as selection tools, 1993. Technical Report 975, United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral Sciences, pp. 60.
5.
ManzeyD.SchieweA.Psychological training of German science astronauts. 1992. Acta Astronautica, 27: 147–154.
6.
MorphewM. E. (1997). The Society for Human Performance in Extreme Environments: Vision statement. Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 2, 158.
7.
NechaevA. P.MyasnikovV. I.StepanovaS. I. (1996). Psychophysiological aspects of cosmonauts errors analysis. 47th International Astronautical Congress, Beijing, China. IAF/IAA-96-G.3.03.
8.
NicholasJ. M.Small Groups in Orbit: Group Interaction and Crew Performance on Space Station. Aviation. Space and Environmental Medicine, 58: 1009–1013, 1987.
9.
PalinkasL. A.GundersonE. K. E.BurrR.Social, psychological, and environmental influences on health and well-being of Antarctic winter-over personnel, 1989. Antarctic Journal of the United States, 24, 207–209.
10.
PalinkasL. A., Sociocultural influences on psychosocial adjustment in Antarctica, 1989. Medical Anthropology, 10, 235–246.
11.
PalinkasL. A., Psychosocial effects of adjustment in Antarctica: Lessons for long-duration spaceflight, 1990. Journal of Spacecraft, 27(5), 471–477.
12.
RoseR. M.HelmreichR. L.FoggL. F.McFaddenT., Psychological predictors of astronaut effectiveness, 1994. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine64: 910–5.
13.
RoseR. M.HelmreichR. L.RoggL. F.McFaddenT.Assessments of astronaut effectiveness. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 1993, 64: 789–94.
14.
SandalG. M.VaernesR.UrsinH.Interpersonal relations during simulated space missions, 1995. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 66: 617–624.
15.
SandalG. M.VaernesR.BerganP. T.WarnckeM.UrsinH., Psychological reactions during polar expeditions and isolation in hyperbaric chambers, 1996. Aviation. Space, and Environmental Medicine, 67(3): 227–234.
16.
SantyP. A., Choosing the Right stuff: The Psychological Selection of Astronauts and Cosmonauts, 1994. Praeger: Wesport, Connecticut.
17.
TaylorA. J. W.The selection of people for work in polar regions: New Zealand and the Antarctic. 1985, New Zealand Antarctic Record, 6, 26–39.
18.
VetterC., Bill Stone in the Abyss, 1994. Outside, 11, 56–65/166–168.
