Even though fit ranks as one of the most important considerations in the purchase of a shoe, the quality of fit has no metric and is hence poorly assessed. Manufacturers, retailers, and customers tend to use trial and error techniques to improve footwear fit. This approach is rather cumbersome and very unscientific. In this paper, we present a methodology to assess and thereby quantify footwear fit so that comfort can be predicted and consequently improved lasts and shoes can be produced that match different shapes of feet.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ANSI/ASTM F539–78 (1986). Standard practice for fitting athletic footwear, 229–235.
2.
British Standard (1980). Methods for measurement and recording for orthopaedic footwear. BS 5943, 1980.
3.
CavanaghP. R. (1980). The running shoe book. Mountain View, CA: Anderson World.
4.
CheskinM. P. (1987). The Complete Handbook of Athletic Footwear. New York: Fairchild Publications.
5.
GoonetillekeR. S. (1998). Designing to Minimize Discomfort. Ergonomics in Design6(3), pp. 12–19.
6.
GoonetillekeR. S.LuximonA. (in press). Foot flare and Foot axis. Human Factors.
7.
HolscherE. C.HuK. K. (1976). Detrimental Results with the common Inflared Shoe. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 7, 1011–1018.
8.
KarwowskiW.JamaldinB. (1996). Methodological framework for quantifying compatibility of complex ergonomic systems. In Proceedings of the 4th Pan-Pacific Conference on Occupational Ergonomics (pp. 676–679). Taipei, Taiwan: Ergonomics Society of Taiwan.
9.
KolarikW. J. (1995). Creating Quality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
MeyerH. (1860). Why the Shoe Pinches. Quoted from Cavanagh, P. R. (1980). The running shoe book. Mountain View, CA: Anderson World.
11.
Putz-AndersonV. (1988). Cumulative Trauma Disorders. NY: Taylor and Francis.
12.
RossiW. A. (1988). The futile search for the perfect shoe fit. Journal of Testing and Evaluation16, 393–403.
