There is a couple of models of engineering design. However empirical results could not verify them so far. One reason might be the conceptualization of design in terms of cognitive micro-processes. A re-interpretation of engineering design as a goal-directed working activity suggests to apply Activity Theory for modeling of design. Starting from empirical results this suggestion is discussed for five essential characteristics of the design process. The characteristics are compatible with the general notions of Activity Theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrownD. C.ChandrasekaranB. (1989). Design Problem Solving.London: Pitman.
2.
BucciarelliL. L.GoldschmidtG.SchonD. A. (1987). Generic design process in architecture and engineering. In ProtzenJ. P. (Ed.), Proceedings of 1987 Conference on Planning and Design in Architecture.American Society of Mechicanal Engineers.
3.
DarkeJ. (1979). The primary generator and the design process. Design Studies, 1, 36–44.
4.
GuindonR. (1990a). Knowledge exploited by experts during software system design. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 33, 279–304.
GüntherJ.EhrlenspielK. (1998). How do designers from practice design? In FrankenbergerE.Badke-SchaubP.BirkhoferH. (Eds.), Designers - The key to successful product development (pp. 85–97). London: Springer.
7.
HackerW. (1989a). On the utility of procedural rules. Ergonomics, 32, 7, 717–732.
8.
HackerW. (1989b). How to feed me computer quickly? Pros and cons of hierarchical data organization. In KlixF.StreitzN. A.WaernY.WandtkeH. (Eds.), Man-Computer interaction research (pp. 253–271. Amsterdam: North - Holland.
HackerW.HandrickS.HeimannI.OehmD.RichterF.SachseD.SchneiderM. (1999). Individuelle Unterschiede im Arbeitsgedächtnis für numerisches Material. Zeitschrift für Differenzielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 20, 290–308.
11.
LeontjewA. N. (1964). Probleme der Entwicklung des Psychischen.Berlin: Volk und Wissen.
12.
MillerG. A.GalanterE.PribramK. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior.New York: Holt.
13.
PacheM.WeißhahnG.RomerA.LindemannU.HackerW. (1999). Effort-saving modeling in early stages of the designs process. ICED′99. International Congress of Engineerinp Design. Proceedings, Vol. 2, 679–684.
14.
RittelH. W. J. (1986) Some principles for the design of an educational system for design. Design Methods and Theories, 20, 359–375.
15.
RückertCTegelO.GaedeckeO.SchrodaF. (1998). Learnability and effectivily of Mechanical Engineering Design Methodology. Integrated Design and Process Technology. IDPT - Volume 3, 110–117. American Society for Design and Process Science: Austin/ Texas.
16.
SachseP.HackerW.LeinertS.RiemerS. (1999). Prototyping als Unterstutzungsmöglichkeit des Denkens und Handelns bein Konstruieren. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 43, 71–82.
17.
SmithG.BrowneG. J. (1993). Conceptual foundations of design problem solving. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23, 1209–1219.
18.
SonnentagS. (1996). Planning and knowledge about strategies. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15, 213–225.
19.
UllmannD. G.DietterichT. G.StaufferL. A. (1988). A model of the mechanical design process based on empirical data. AI EDAM, 2, 33–52.
20.
VisserW. (1994). Organization of design activities: Opportunistic, with hierarchical episodes. Interacting with computers, 6, S. 239–274.
