The data presented below was collected at a Virtual Reality (VR) amusement center in Orlando, FL. This study is exploratory, i.e., an initial attempt to try and uncover factor(s) that may interact with age when determining user enjoyment of a VR ride. In addition, we measured each participant's state of wellbeing to see how the VR rides in the center impacted our participants. 28 people participated in the study. Three age groups, Young, Middle, and Old, were established from our sample (meanage=11, 28, and 50, respectively). Significant correlation's between age and several survey questions were found. Although one person dropped out there were no significant differences in sickness scores, either between age groups or collapsed across groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenR. C.BoltonA. E.EhrlichJ. A.McDonaldD. P. (1999). The virtual reality ride questionnaire (VRRQ): A virtual reality entertainment evaluation tool. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, p. 1409.
2.
BarfieldW.HendrixC. (1995). The effect of update rate on the sense of presence within virtual environments. Virtual Reality: The Journal of the Virtual Reality Society, 1(1), 3–16.
3.
BrickenM.ByrneC. M. (1993). Summer students in virtual reality: A pilot study on educational applications of virtual reality technology. Available: http://www.hitl.washington.edu Directory: publications/r-92-1.
4.
GilkeyR. H.WeisenbergerJ. M. (1995). The sense of presence for the suddenly deafened adult: Implications for virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 4(4), 357–363.
5.
HeeterC. (1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(2), 262–271.
6.
HendrixC.BarfieldW. (1996a). Presence within virtual environments as a function of visual display parameters. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(3), 274–289.
7.
HendrixC.BarfieldW. (1996b). The sense of presence within auditory virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(3), 290–301.
8.
KalawskyR. S. (1999). VRUSE — a computerised diagnostic tool: For usability evaluation of virtual/synthetic environment systems. Applied Ergonomics, 30(1), 11–25.
9.
KennedyR. S.LaneN. E.BerbaumK. S.LillenthalM. G. (1993). Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(3), 203–220.
10.
McCrearyF. A. (1997). Adult-child differences in spatial learning in an immersive virtual environment as a function of Field-of-View. Unpublished master's thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, USA.
11.
McDonaldD. P.VincenziD. A.MuldoonR. V.TylerR. R.BarlowA. S.SmitherJ. A. (1998). Examination of age-related performance differences on a locomotion task in a virtual environment (abstract). Proceeding of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 42nd Annual Meeting. Chicago, IL.
12.
PauschR.SnoddyJ.TaylorR.WatsonS.HaseltineE. (1996). Disney's Aladdin: First steps toward storytelling in virtual reality. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics, 193–203.
13.
PimentelK.TeixeiraK. (1995). Virtual Reality: Through the Looking Glass. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
SchneiderM. (1998, June 20). First DisneyQuest opens in Florida. Philadelphia, other cities, may get them. The Philadelphia Inquirer, p. D07.
15.
SingerM. J.EhrlichA.AllenR. C. (1998). Virtual environment sickness: Adaptation to and recovery from a search task. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, 1506–1510.
16.
SlaterM.UsohM. (1992). An Experimental Exploration of Presence in Virtual Environments. Internal Report, Department of Computer Science, QMW University of London.
17.
SlaterM.UsohM.SteedA. (1995). Taking steps: The influence of a walking metaphor on presence in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)2(3), 201–219.
18.
StanneyK. M.LanhamD. S.KennedyR. S.BreauxR. (1999). Virtual environment exposure drop-out thresholds. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, 1223–1227.
19.
StytzM. R. (1996). Distributed virtual environments. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications16(3), 19–31.
20.
UnoS.SlaterM. (1997). The sensitivity of presence to collision response. In StanfieldS.HodgesL.GreenM. (Eds.), IEEE VRAIS 97 (pp. 95–105). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
