Aviation incidents involving poor weather may be related to cognitive and contextual factors that lead pilots to continue with flights in the face of cues suggesting that doing so could be hazardous (i.e., commit “plan continuation errors” or PCE). To test this, 276 ASRS incident reports involving in-flight encounters with weather were analyzed. Part 91, 135 and 121 operations were found to differ significantly in their relative frequency of commission of PCEs. Factors such as hours of pilot experience, poor visibility, and crew conflict were related to the performance of a PCE. Different factors were related to PCEs committed within the three Part operations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FischhoffB. (1975). Hindsight/=foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299.
2.
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) (1989). Safety Report – General Aviation Accidents Involving Visual Flight Rules into Instrument Meteorological Conditions (NTSB/SR-89/01). Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
3.
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) (1994). Safety Study – A Review of Flightcrew-Involved Major Accidents of U.S. Air Carriers, 1978 through 1990 (NTSB/SS-94/01). Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
4.
NormanD. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1–15.
5.
OrasanuJ.MartinL.DavisonJ. (In press). Cognitive and contextual factors in aviation accidents. In KleinG.SalasE. (Eds.) Applications of Naturalistic Decision Making. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
ReasonJ. (1990). Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
