Professional identity development is a multifaceted process shaped by a combination of cultural values, social expectations, and personal experiences. While transformative learning and experiential learning methods have been extensively studied, the role of embodied and reflective practices, particularly in cross-cultural settings, remains underexplored. This study examines the transformative processes experienced by the researcher, a Japan-born scholar navigating her professional identity in the United States through an embodied learning approach. By employing an autoethnography-inspired method, the research study investigates how cultural and somatic dimensions intersect to help shape identity and leadership development, offering a deeper understanding of the potential for non-verbal, experiential learning to facilitate professional growth.
AsakuraT. (2019). Interaction between Japanese Buddhism and confucianism. In KopfG. (Ed.), The Dao companion to Japanese Buddhist philosophy. Dao companions to Chinese philosophy (Vol. 8, pp. 205–234). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2924-9_7
2.
BaldwinC. K.MotterA. E. (2021). Autoethnographic dance and transformative learning: Exploring self-reflexive identity work and change. Journal of Transformative Education, 19(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344620943681
3.
BilginoğluE. (2021). Equine-assisted experiential learning on leadership development. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 10(2021), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.33844/IJOL.2021.60532
4.
BlumerH. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.
5.
BoyleM.ParryK. (2007). Telling the whole story: The case for organizational autoethnography. Culture and Organization, 13(3), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759550701486480
6.
ChangH. (2008). Autoethnography as method. Left Coast Press.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
9.
DirkxJ. (2006). Engaging emotions in adult learning: A Jungian perspective on emotion in transformative learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2006(109), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.204
10.
DirkxJ.EspinozaB. (2017). From cognition to the imaginal: Fostering self-understanding from and through emotions in adult learning. In BelzerA.DashwerB. (Eds.), Understanding the adult learner (p. 316). Routledge.
11.
DirkxJ.SchlegelS. (2023). The role of emotion-laden experiences in self-formation. In BelzerA.DashewB. (Eds.), Understanding the adult learner (pp. 99–116). Routledge.
EllisC.BochnerA. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, and personal reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Sage.
14.
ErichsenE. A. (2011). Learning for change: Transforming international experience as identity work. Journal of Transformative Education, 9(2), 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344611428227
15.
FlemingT. (2018). Mezirow and the theory of transformative learning. In Critical theory and transformative learning (pp. 120–136). IGI Global.
16.
GrenierR. S. (2015). Autoethnography as a legitimate approach to HRD research: A methodological conversation at 30,000 feet. Human Resource Development Review, 14(3), 332–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484315595507
17.
GrenierR. S.CollinsJ. C. (2016). “Man, have I got a story for you”: Facilitated autoethnography as a potential research methodology in human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 15(3), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316656658
18.
HaraK.Fujimura-FanselowK. (2011). Educational challenges past and present. In Fujimura-FanselowK. (Ed.), Transforming Japan (pp. 71–88). The Feminist Press.
19.
HaslamS. A.ReicherS. D.PlatowM. J. (2020). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence, and power (2nd ed.). Routledge.
20.
HemingwayA.CarterS.CallawayA.KavanaghE.EllisS. (2019). An exploration of the mechanism of action of an equine-assisted intervention. Animals, 9(6), 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060303
JarvisP. (2006). Towards a comprehensive theory of human learning: Lifelong learning and the learning society (Vol. 1). Routledge.
24.
JettenJ.HaslamS. A.CruwysT.GreenawayK. H.HaslamC.SteffensN. K. (2017). Advancing the social identity approach to health and well-being: Progressing the social cure research agenda. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(7), 789–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2333
25.
JohnsonR. R. (2003). Autobiography and transformative learning: Narrative search for self. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(3), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1541344603001003004
26.
KarpiakI. E. (2003). The ethnographic, the reflective, and the uncanny: Three “tellings” of autobiography. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1541344603001002003
27.
KeganR. (1982). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Harvard University Press.
28.
KellyS. (2014). Horses for courses: Exploring the limits of leadership development through equine-assisted learning. Journal of Management Education, 38(2), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562913489027
29.
LawrenceR. L. (2012). Intuitive knowing and embodied consciousness. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2012(134), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20011
30.
MeltzerB. N.PetrasJ.ReynoldsL. T. (1975). Symbolic interactionism: Genesis, varieties and criticism. Routledge.
31.
MeolaC. C. (2016). Addressing the needs of the millennial workforce through equine assisted learning. Journal of Management Development, 35(3), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-08-2015-0110
32.
MezirowJ. (1975). Education for perspective transformation: Women’s reentry programs in community colleges. Center for Adult Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.
33.
MezirowJ. (2000). Learning as transformation. Jossey-Bass.
34.
MezirowJ. (2018). Transformative learning theory. In IllerisK. (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning (2nd ed., pp. 114–128). Routledge.
35.
NakamuraY. T.MilnerJ.YuD.HinshawJ. (2025). The role of empathy in leadership ethics: Examining empathic relational leadership practice through video-based methods. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2024.27
NakamuraY. T.HorimotoM. (2021). Status of women leaders in Japan: Challenges and opportunities. In NakamuraY. T.HorimotoM.McLeanG. L. (Eds.), Japanese women in leadership (pp. 3–23). Palgrave MacMillan.
38.
PohlL. (2025). The effectiveness of equine-assisted learning to develop presencing mastery. International Journal of Presencing Leadership & Coaching, 2(1), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.69470/h8cdsy85
39.
PoulosC. N. (2021). Essentials of autoethnography. American Psychological Association.
40.
ReynoldsL. T. (1990). Interactionism: Exposition and critique (2nd ed.). General Hall.
41.
RichardsR. (2008). Writing the othered self: Autoethnography and the problem of objectification in writing about illness and disability. Qualitative Health Research, 18(12), 1717–1728. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308325866
42.
RomanoA.KramlichD. J.MarsickV.Cotter ZakrzewskiT.Anderson-SatheL.BrunsteinJ.CunliffE.LongmoreA.-L. (2024). Practicing embodied listening for transformation: The transformative listening protocol. Journal of Transformative Education, 23(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/15413446241258681
43.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
44.
SchönD. A. (2017). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge.
45.
SchönD. A. (2019). Education for reflection-in-action: An alternative to the positivist epistemology of practice. In The optimum utilization of knowledge (pp. 314–332). Routledge.
46.
SivagurunathanR. S.SenathirajahA.SivagurunathanL.QaziS.HaqueR. (2025). Equine-assisted experiential learning: A literature review of embodied leadership development in organizational behavior. Administrative Sciences, 15(8), 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15080298
SugiharaY.KatsuradaE. (2002). Gender role development in Japanese culture: Diminishing gender role differences in a contemporary society. Sex Roles, 47(9–10), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021648426787
50.
UsuiC.RoseS.KageyamaR. (2003). Women, institutions, and leadership in Japan. Asian Perspective, 27(3), 85–123. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42704422
51.
WallSarah (2008). Easier Said than Done: Writing an Autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700103
52.
YamamotoM.RanW. (2014). Should men work outside and women stay home? Revisiting the cultivation of gender-role attitudes in Japan. Mass Communication and Society, 17(6), 920–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.860989
53.
YorksL.KaslE. (2006). I know more than I can say: A taxonomy for using expressive ways of knowing to foster transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 4(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1541344605283151
