This literature review explores how various challenges and possibilities of enacting collaborative inquiry (CI) in online contexts intersect with this holistic action research method’s aims of transforming participant being, knowing, and doing. This article asks how digital tools and virtual platforms enable and constrain the democratic collaboration, solidarity-in-diversity, and multiple ways of knowing CI strives to cultivate. Findings and discussion offer guidance for conveners of online CIs and highlight further practical considerations.
AllenJ.MorrishA.RumboldJ. (2021). Companioning the work: Living the legacy of Dr Warren Lett. Journal of Applied Arts.& Health, 12(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1386/jaah_00055_1
2.
AstleM. M. (2001). Reconstructing work on the web: Collaborative online inquiry and storytelling with Canadian women entrepreneurs. Fielding Graduate Institute.
3.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
4.
BellT.UrhahneD.SchanzeS.PloetznerR. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802582241
5.
BoudD.WalkerD. (1993). Barriers to reflection on experience. In BoudD.CohenR.WalkerD. (Eds.), Using experience for learning (pp. 73–86). The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
6.
BrayJ. N.LeeJ.SmithL. L.YorksL. (2000). Collaborative inquiry in practice: Action, reflection, and making meaning. Sage.
7.
BrownA.BrownC.FineB.LuterbachK.SugarW.VinciguerraD. C. (2009). Instructional uses of podcasting in online learning environments: A cooperative inquiry study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 37(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.37.4.b
8.
CiampaK.GallagherT. L. (2015). Blogging to enhance in-service teachers’ professional learning and development during collaborative inquiry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 883–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9404-7
9.
CrowtherS.BalabanoffD.KayL.HallJ. (2021). Using a virtual platform for an asynchronous co-operative inquiry. Action research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503211004707
10.
DaleA. (2001). At the edge: Sustainable development in the 21st Century. UBC Press.
11.
DirkxJ. M. (2001). The power of feelings: Emotion, imagination, and the construction of meaning in adult learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.9
12.
DuenkelN.PrattJ.SullivanJ. (2014). Seeking wholeheartedness in education: Power, hegemony, and transformation. Journal of Transformative Education, 12(3), 266–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344614543192
13.
European-American Collaborative Challenging Whiteness. (2005). When first-person inquiry is not enough: Challenging whiteness through first and second-person inquiry. Action Research, 3(3), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750305056000
14.
FellerA.JensenA.MarieD.PeddigrewB.Clinchard-SepedaL.CampbellE. (2004). Quadrinity online: Toward a fuller expression of transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 2(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344604265370
15.
GarrisonD. R.AndersonT.ArcherW. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
16.
GendlinE. T. (2007). Focusing. Bantam.
17.
Hanlin-RowneyA.KuntzelmanK.LaraM. E. A.QuinnD.RoffmannK.NicholsT. T.WelshL. (2006). Collaborative inquiry as a framework for exploring transformative learning online. Journal of Transformative Education, 4(4), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344606294820
18.
HeronJ. (1992). Feeling and personhood: Psychology in another key. Sage.
19.
HeronJ. (1996). Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. Sage.
HeronJ.ReasonP. (2008). Extending epistemology within a co-operative inquiry. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), The sage handbook of action research (pp. 366–380). Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848607934.n32
22.
HineC. (2015). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. Routledge.
23.
HowellN. J. (2020). A collaborative inquiry into “How can Millennials develop and maintain resilience in the workplace?” [Master’s thesis, Saint Mary’s College of California]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Publication No. 28150748.
24.
JarvisP. (2006). Towards a comprehensive theory of human learning. Routledge.
25.
KaslE.YorksL. (2010). “Whose inquiry is this anyway?” Money, power, reports, and collaborative inquiry. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(4), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713609347367
26.
KaslE.YorksL. (2016). Do I really know you? Do you really know me? Empathy amid diversity in differing learning contexts. Adult Education Quarterly, 66(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713615606965
27.
LangeE. (2018). Transforming transformative education through ontologies of relationality. Journal of Transformative Education, 16(4), 280–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/154134461878645
28.
LarsonD. (2017). Increasing volunteerism through a virtual collaborative inquiry. [Master’s thesis, Saint Mary’s College of California]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Publication No. 10743101.
29.
LawrenceR. L. (2008). Powerful feelings: Exploring the affective domain of informal and arts-based learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2008(120), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.317
30.
LawrenceR. L.PaigeD. S. (2016). What our ancestors knew: Teaching and learning through storytelling. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2016(149), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20177
31.
LeeC. D.SmagorinskyP. (Eds.), (2000). Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry learning in doing: Social, cognitive, and computational perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
32.
McCallumD.NicolaidesA.YorksL. (2016). Exploring the ego at the boundary of the i and the we. In GunnlaugsonO.BrabantM. (Eds.), Cohering the integral We space: Engaging collective emergence, wisdom and healing in groups (pp. 57–78). Integral Publishing House.
33.
McKegneyD. A. (2014). Collaborative inquiry on behaviors that broaden awareness and effectively direct attention. [Master’s thesis, Saint Mary’s College of California]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Publication No. 1584869.
34.
Moreira-RamirezN. L. (2020). A collaborative inquiry to address burn-out in student affairs professionals on college campuses. [Master’s thesis, Saint Mary’s College of California]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Publication No. 28092990.
35.
OspinaS.El HadidyW.Hofmann-PinillaA. (2008). Cooperative inquiry for learning and connectedness. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 5(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767330802185673
36.
PerryS. A. B. (2021). Participatory feeling: Re-visioning transformative learning theory through Heron’s whole person perspective. Adult Education Quarterly, 71(4), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136211016779
37.
PowJ.FuJ. (2012). Developing digital literacy through collaborative inquiry learning in the web 2.0 environment – An exploration of implementing strategy. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11(1), 287–299. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/111506/
38.
ReasonP. (1988). Introduction. In ReasonP. (Ed.), Human inquiry in action: Developments in new paradigm research (pp. 1–17). Sage.
ReasonP.TorbertW. (2001). The action turn: Toward a transformational social science. Concepts and Transformation, 6(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.6.1.02rea
41.
SkolimowskiH. (1994). The participatory mind: A new theory of knowledge and of the universe. Penguin Books.
42.
SmithL. R. (2016). Growing together: The evolution of consciousness using collaborative developmental action inquiry. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Publication No. 27956531.
43.
SohmerO. (2020). An exploration of the value of cooperative inquiry for transpersonal psychology, education, and research: A theoretical and qualitative inquiry. [Doctoral dissertation, California Institute of Integral Studies]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Publication No. 2481067710.
44.
ThorpeS. J. (2008). Enhancing the effectiveness of online groups: An investigation of storytelling in the facilitation of online groups. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Auckland University of Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/10292/778
TorracoR. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
47.
WestJ. M. (2020). The museum and the laboratory: Classical music as stimuli for the design of pedagogical strategies for improvisation. [Doctoral Dissertation, Teachers college, Columbia University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. publication No. 28024321.
48.
WhitakerL.RussE.PetrakisM.HaltonC.WaltersC.WoolvenM.ShortM. (2022). Cooperative inquiry online: Investigation innovation in work-integrated learning across four countries. SAGE research methods: Doing research online. SAGE. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781529603910
49.
YorksL.KaslE. (2002). Toward a theory and practice for whole-person learning: Reconceptualizing experience and the role of affect. Adult Education Quarterly, 52(3), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136020523002
50.
YorksL.KaslE. (2006). I know more than I can say: A taxonomy for using expressive ways of knowing to foster transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 4(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344605283151
51.
ZhuG.XingW.PopovV. (2019). Uncovering the sequential patterns in transformative and non-transformative discourse during collaborative inquiry learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 41(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.02.001
