Contextual Preconditions to Foster Transformative Learning: A Recursive Process,Activity,and Core Elements

Abstract

The need of being able to foster transformative learning (TL) has increased due to the demands for continuous development in today’s work life. Previous research has proposed six core elements to foster TL; however, in these a process perspective is missing. By using an adaptive approach and inspired by action research, drawing on teachers’ experiences, the aim of this article is to deepen the understanding of how teachers can create contextual preconditions to foster TL. The empirical data was based on teachers’ narratives, interviews with students, and observations from a university course. This article contributes by proposing a framework for contextual preconditions to foster TL by extending the six core elements with a recursive process and activity. To foster TL, the importance of continuously adapting the preconditions to the needs of each specific educational situation is emphasized.

Keywords

transformative learning preconditions core elements recursive process activity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altrichter

Posch

Somekh

(1993). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to the methods of action research. Routledge.

Alvesson

Sköldberg

(2017). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. SAGE.

Burk

A. L.

(2006). Do the write thing. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2006(109), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.210

Cohen

Manion

Morrison

(2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Cranton

(2002). Teaching for transformation. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2002(93), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.50

Cranton

(2006). Fostering authentic relationships in the transformative classroom. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2006(109), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.203

Dewey

(1997). How we think. Courier Corporation.

Dirkx

J. M.

(1998). Transformative learning theory in the practice of adult education: An overview. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 7, 1–14.

Efron

S. E.

Ravid

(2020). Action research in education: A practical guide (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

10.

Engeström

Sannino

(2012). Whatever happened to process theories of learning? Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.002

11.

Formenti

Jorio

(2019). Multiple visions, multiple voices: A dialogic methodology for teaching in higher education. Journal of Transformative Education, 17(3), 208–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344618796761

12.

Grant

Nelson

Mitchell

(2008). Negotiating the challenges of participatory action research: Relationships, power, participation, change and credibility. In Reason

Bradbury

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. SAGE.

13.

Guanglu

(2012). On the recursion between teaching and learning. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 9(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct16537

14.

Haber-Curran

Tillapaugh

D. W.

(2015). Student-centered transformative learning in leadership education: An examination of the teaching and learning process. Journal of Transformative Education, 13(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344614559947

15.

Hersted

(2017). Reflective role-playing in the development of dialogic skill. Journal of Transformative Education, 15(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344616686765

16.

Jess

Keay

Carse

(2016). Primary physical education: A complex learning journey for children and teachers. Sport, Education and Society, 21(7), 1018–1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2014.979142

17.

Kasworm

C. E.

Bowles

T. A.

(2012). Fostering transformative learning in higher education settings. In Taylor

E. W.

Cranton

(Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 388–407). Jossey-Bass.

18.

Kember

Leung

D. Y. P.

Jones

Loke

A. Y.

McKay

Sinclair

Tse

Webb

Yuet Wong

F. K.

Wong

Yeung

(2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611442

19.

Kember

McKay

Sinclair

Wong

F. K. Y.

(2008). A four‐category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293355

20.

Kolb

D. A.

(1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

21.

Kreber

(2012). Critical reflection and transformative learning. In Taylor

E. W.

Cranton

(Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 323–341). Jossey- Bass.

22.

Layder

(1998). Sociological practice: Linking theory and social research. SAGE.

23.

Lindhult

(2008). Att bedöma och uppnå kvalitet i interaktiv forskning [To assess and achieve quality in interactive research]. In Johannisson

Gunnarsson

Stjernberg

(Eds.), Gemensamt kunskapande: den interaktiva forskningens praktik [Common knowledge creation - interactive research practice] (pp. 333–348). Växjö University Press.

24.

Lunenberg

Korthagen

Swennen

(2007). The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 586–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.001

25.

McNiff

(2013). Action research: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203112755

26.

Meijer

M.-J.

Kuijpers

Boei

Vrieling

Geijsel

(2016). Professional development of teacher-educators towards transformative learning. Professional Development in Education, 43(5), 819–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1254107

27.

Mezirow

(1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.

28.

Mezirow

(2009). An overview on transformative learning. In Illeris

(Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning. Learning theoriststheir own words (pp. 90–105). Routledge.

29.

Norton

(2018). Action research in teaching and learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. Routledge.

30.

Oxford English Dictionary . (n.d.). Recursive, adj. and n. In Oxford English Dictionary. https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/160103?redirectedFrom=recursive (Accessed on 7 December 2020).

31.

Platzer

Blake

Ashford

(2000). An evaluation of process and outcomes from learning through reflective practice groups on a post-registration nursing course. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(3), 689–695. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01337.x

32.

Quillinan

MacPhail

Dempsey

McEvoy

(2019). Transformative teaching and learning through engaged practice: Lecturers’ and students’ experiences in a University and underserved community partnership in Ireland. Journal of Transformative Education, 17(3), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344618809681

33.

Schapiro

Wasserman

Gallegos

(2011). Group work and dialogue in transformative learning: A framework. In Alhadeff-Jones

Kokkos

(Eds.), Transformative learning in time of crisis: Individual and collective challenges (pp. 289–295).

34.

Schein

E. H.

(1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Addison-Wesley.

35.

Scribner

J. P.

Donaldson

J. F.

(2001). The dynamics of group learning in a cohort: From nonlearning to transformative learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 605–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131610121969442

36.

Senge

P. M.

(2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Currency Doubleday.

37.

Stoyanova

P. V.

(2015). The development of ‘sustainability-banking’ capability in the changing institutional environment: The case of RBS [Doctoral dissertation. The University of Edinburgh]. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.700083

38.

Svensson

(2008). Att vara som skoskav ["Being like chafed feet", acting as an irritant to provoke change]. In Johannisson

Gunnarsson

Stjernberg

(Eds.), Gemensamt kunskapande - den interaktiva forskningens praktik [Common knowledge creation - interactive research practice] (pp. 77–94). Växjö University Press.

39.

Swedish Research Council (2002). Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisksamhällsvetenskaplig forskning [Research ethics principles in humanities and social science research. Vetenskapsrådet.

40.

Swedish Research Council (2017). Good research practice. Swedish Research Council. https://www.vr.se/english/analysis/reports/our-reports/2017-08-31-good-research-practice.html

41.

Taylor

E. W.

(2000a). Analyzing research on transformative learning theory. In Mezirow

Ass (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. Jossey-Bass.

42.

Taylor

E. W.

(2000b). Fostering Mezirow’s transformative learning theory in the adult education classroom: A critical review. The Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 14(2), 1–28.

43.

Taylor

E. W.

(2007). An update of transformative learning theory: A critical review of the empirical research (1999–2005). International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370701219475

44.

Taylor

E. W.

(2009). Fostering transformative learning. In Mezirow

Taylor

E. W.

(Eds.), Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace, and higher education (pp. 3–17). Jossey- Bass.

45.

Taylor

E. W.

Jarecke

(2009). Looking forward by looking back: Reflections on the practice of transformative learning. In Mezirow

Taylor

E. W.

(Eds.), Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace, and higher education (pp. 275–289). Jossey-Bass.

46.

van de Ven

A. H.

(1992). Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131013

47.

Vayda

A. P.

McCay

B. J.

Eghenter

(1991). Concepts of process in social science explanations. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 21(3), 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839319102100302