Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Collaboration across multiple perspectives enhances the potential for innovative solutions to the complex issues of our time. An interdisciplinary education (IDE) community of practice (CoP) proved to be a catalyst for bringing together interested faculty from across a large public college to create an IDE learning event focused on homelessness. Using a qualitative research approach, we explored the process and impact on student learning. Four main themes emerged: authentic engagement, transcending perspectives, collective responsibility, and cultivating curiosity. The first three themes identify the transformative power of IDE, while the last theme highlights the challenge of remaining open to differing perspectives. We learned the value of incorporating perspectives beyond strictly disciplinary views, such as narratives from those directly impacted by homelessness—to stimulate empathy, transformation, and the will to act.

Keywords

interdisciplinary transdisciplinary transformative learning experiential learning community of practice multiple perspectives college students

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abalos

(1996). Strategies of transformation toward a multicultural society: Fulfilling the story of democracy. Praeger.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brown

V. A.

Harris

J. A.

Russell

(2010). Tackling wicked problems: Through the transdisciplinary imagination. Routledge. Earthscan. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2011.0029

Burke

(2009). From strategic foresight to conversations about alternative and desired futures using scenarios to transform the present. Journal of Futures Studies, 13(3), 99–104.

Camosun College . (n.d.). About interdisciplinary education. http://camosun.ca/about/interdisciplinary-education/

Choi

Pak

(2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical & Investigative Medicine, 29(6), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v30i6.2950

Cranton

(1994). Understanding and promoting transformative learning. Jossey-Bass.

Cranton

(2016). Understanding and promoting transformative learning (3rd ed.). Stylus Publishing.

Creswell

(2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.

10.

Crossley

M. L.

(2000). Narrative psychology, trauma, and the study of self/identity. Theory & Psychology, 10(4), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354300104005

11.

Franks

Dale

Hindmarsh

Fellows

Buckridge

Cybinski

(2007). Interdisciplinary foundations: Reflecting on interdisciplinarity and three decades of teaching and research at Griffith University, Australia. Studies In Higher Education, 32(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701267228

12.

Freire

(1983). Pedagogy of the oppressed. The continuum Publishing Corporation.

13.

Gillis

Nelson

Driscoll

Hodgins

Fraser

Jacobs

(2017). Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research and education in Canada: A review and suggested framework. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 10, 203–222. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v10i0.4745

14.

Glesne

(1999). Becoming qualitative: An introduction (2nd ed.). Longman.

15.

Hammarberg

Kirkman

de Lacey

(2016). Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction, 31(3), 498–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev334

16.

Hart

(2009). From information to transformation: Education for the evolution of consciousness. Peter Lang Publishing.

17.

Haynes

Leonard

J. B.

(2010). From surprise parties to mapmaking: Undergraduate journeys toward interdisciplinary understanding. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(5), 645–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2010.11779070

18.

Heale

Forbes

(2013). Understanding triangulation in research. Evidence Based Nursing, 16(4), 98. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2013-101494

19.

Heifetz

R. A.

Laurie

D. L.

(2001). The work of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 79(11), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1109/emr.2002.1022401

20.

Hoffman

M. L.

(1990). Empathy and justice motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 14(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00991641

21.

Hoggan

(2016). Transformative learning as a metatheory: Definition, criteria, and typology. Adult Education Quarterly, 66(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713615611216

22.

Hoggan

Chad

Malkki

Kaisu

Finnegan

Fergal

(2017). Developing the theory of perspective transformation: Continuity, intersubjectivity, and emancipatory praxis. Adult Education Quarterly, 67(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713616674076.

23.

Kegan

(1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0360966900017084

24.

Kegan

(2000). What “form” transforms? In Mezirow

Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation, (pp. 35–69). Jossey-Bass.

25.

Kegan

Lahey

(2001). How the way we talk can change the way we work: Seven languages for transformation. Jossey-Bass.

26.

Kolb

(2017). Experiential learning theory as a guide for experiential educators in higher education. Experiential Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), Article 7. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/elthe/vol1/iss1/7

27.

Lee

B. A.

Farrell

C. R.

Link

B. G.

(2004). Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The case of public exposure to homelessness. American Sociological Review, 69(1), 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900104

28.

Maxwell

J. A.

(2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Sage.

29.

Meadows

(2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green.

30.

Mezirow

(2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.

31.

Mezirow

(2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344603252172

32.

Nandan

London

(2013). Interdisciplinary professional education: Training college students for collaborative social change. Education & Training, 5(7/9), 815–835. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-06-2013-0078

33.

Okri

, (1996). Dangerous love. Phoenix House.

34.

Palmer

Zajonc

(2010). The heart of higher education: A call to renewal. Jossey-Bass.

35.

Repko

(2008). Assessing interdisciplinary learning outcomes. New York, USA: Academic Exchange Quarterly.

36.

Russell

Wickson

Carew

(2008). Transdisciplinarity: Context, contradictions and capacity. Futures, 40(5), 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2007.10.005

37.

Senge

Scharmer

Jaworski

Flowers

(2004). Presence: Human purpose and the field of the future. Crown Publishing.

38.

Siegel

(2010). Mindsight: The new science of personal transformation. Bantam Books.

39.

Slavich

G. M.

Zimbardo

P. G.

(2012). Transformational teaching: Theoretical underpinnings, basic principles, and core methods. Educational Psychology Review, 24(4), 569–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9199-6

40.

Southern

(2014). Presencing as being in care: Extending theory U through a relational framework. In Gunnlaugson

Baron

Cayer

(Eds.), Perspectives on theory U. IGI Global.

41.

Thannhauser

Russell-Mayhew

Scott

(2010). Measures of interprofessional education and collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 24(4), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820903442903

42.

Titchen

McCormack

(2010). Dancing with stones: Critical creativity as methodology for human flourishing. Educational Action Research, 18(4), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2010.524826

43.

Tolliver

D. E.

Tisdell

E. J.

(2006). Engaging spirituality in the transformative higher education classroom. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2006(109), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.206

44.

Winnicott

D. W.

(1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 41(6), 1960–1963. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780190271381.003.0022

45.

Woodhill

(2010). Capacities for institutional innovation: A complexity perspective. IDS Bulletin, 41(3), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00136.x

46.

Yorks

Kasl

(2002). Toward a theory and practice for whole person learning: Reconceptualising experience and the role of affect. Adult Education Quarterly, 52(3), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136020523002

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.32 MB

Creating Transformative Interdisciplinary Learning Opportunities for College Students

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material