As college student educators, we notice a pattern of difficulty in our students’ ability to engage meaningfully across ideological differences. In this work, we posit the social media mindset’s penchant for reductive framing and outgroup shaming as a potential diagnosis of the problem. We explore how these tendencies show up in the classroom; we present alternative frameworks for stimulating better conversations across differences. These frameworks include promoting democratic civility (as opposed to niceness), understanding ourselves as works in progress (as opposed to engaging call-out and cancel culture), and creating the conditions for the call-in (as opposed to “ducking diversity”).
AlemánS. M.GaytánS. (2017). ‘It doesn’t speak to me:’ Understanding student of color resistance to critical race pedagogy. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(2), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1242801
2.
AsanteM. K. (2003). Erasing racism: The survival of the American nation. Prometheus Books.
GarcíaAF (2015). Beyond theory: Martin Buber’s I and thou and the role of contemplation in integrated relational counseling. Journal of Creativity in Mental HealthJournal of Creativity in Mental Health, 10(4), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2015.1094435
5.
ByrdC. M.RastogiR.ElliotE. R. (2020). Engagement with diversity experiences: A self-regulated learning perspective. In ParsonL.OzakiC. (Eds.), Teaching and learning for social justice and equity in higher education (pp. 137–156). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44939-1
6.
ConyersA.FieldsC. W.GarciaM. L.RivasM.HanssenD.WilliamsS. A. S. (2020). Association awareness: Pedagogically reframing difficult dialogues. In ParsonL.OzakiC. (Eds.), In teaching and learning for social justice and equity in higher education (pp. 239–257). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44939-1
7.
DiAngeloR. J. (2018). White fragility: Why it’s so hard for white people to talk about racism. Beacon Press.
SaetraE. (2019). Teaching controversial issues: A pragmatic view of the criterion debate. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 53(2), 323–339.
16.
SchuethsA. M.GladneyT.CrawfordD. M.BassK. L.MooreH. A. (2013). Passionate pedagogy and emotional labor: Students’ responses to learning diversity from diverse instructors. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(10), 1259–1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2012.731532
17.
SengeP. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.
18.
ShahjahanR. A. (2005). Spirituality in the academy: Reclaiming from the margins and evoking a transformative way of knowing the world. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(6), 685–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500298188
19.
ShahjahanR. A. (2011). Decolonizing the evidence‐based education and policy movement: revealing the colonial vestiges in educational policy, research, and neoliberal reform. Journal of Education Policy, 26(2), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1080.02680939.2010.508176
20.
ShahjahanR. A. (2014). From ‘no’ to ‘yes:’ Postcolonial perspectives on resistance to neoliberal higher education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2012.745732
