Transformative learning captures the process by which students engage in their learning, experience a change in perspective, of themselves or society, and then enact their new understanding. The purpose of this 4-year, four-cohort study was to identify the transformative learning experiences of Master of Social Work students and specific student engagement strategies they felt made a difference in preparing them for professional practice. Six focus groups (n = 40) were conducted using established focus group methodology. All focus groups were audio recorded, professionally transcribed verbatim, and subject to qualitative content analysis. Students identified six themes in student engagement strategies that facilitated their transformative learning, including transformative aspects of the curriculum, experiences with peers, qualities in their relationships with faculty that fostered critical reflection, a sense of identity, and mentoring. This study will help educators better identify teaching strategies to engage students in their personal and professional transformative learning.
Archer-KuhnB. (2013). Structured controversy: Inquiry-based learning in place of traditional group presentations. Teaching Innovations Projects, 3, 1–13. Retrieved fromhttp://ir.lib.uwo.ca/tips/vol3/iss1/14
2.
BergB. L. (1995). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
BoitelC. R.FrommL. R. (2014). Defining signature pedagogy in social work education: Learning theory and the learning contract. Journal of Social Work Education, 50, 608–622. doi:10.1080/10437797.2014.947161
4.
BrookfieldS. (2009). The concept of critical reflection: Promises and contradictions. European Journal of Social Work, 12, 293–304. doi:10.1080/13691450902945215
5.
BrookfieldS. (2016). So what exactly is critical about critical reflection? In FookJ.CollingtonV.RossF.RuchG.WestL. (Eds.), Researching critical reflection (pp. 9–22). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
6.
BrownK. (2006). Leadership for social justice and equity: Evaluating a transformative framework and andragogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 700–745. doi:10.1177/0013161X06290650
CrantonP.TaylorE. (2012). Transformative learning theory: Seeking a more unified theory. In TaylorE.CrantonP.Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research and practise (pp. 3–20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
CrantonP.WrightB. (2008). The transformative educator as learning companion. Journal of Transformative Education, 6, 33–47. doi:10.1177/1541344608316961
10.
CurranR. (2017). Students as partners—Good for students, good for staff: A study on the impact of partnership working and how this translates to improved student-staff engagement. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1, 1–16. doi:10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3089
11.
DamianakisT.WoodfordM. R. (2012). Qualitative research with small connected communities: Generating new knowledge while upcoming research ethics. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 708–718. doi:10.1177/1049732311431444
12.
DirkxJ. M. (2001). The power of feelings: Emotion, imagination, and the construction of meaning in adult learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001, 63–72.
13.
DuerrM.ZajoncA.DanaD. (2003). Survey of transformative and spiritual dimensions of higher education. Journal of Transformative Education, 1, 177–211. doi:10.1177/1541344603001003002
FookJ.AskelandG. A. (2007). Challenges of critical reflection: Nothing ventured, nothing gained. Social Work Education, 26, 520–533. doi:10.1080/02615470601118662
16.
GraneheimU. H.LundmanB. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.
17.
HalpernD. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognition monitoring. American Psychologist, 53, 449–455.
18.
Harrell-LevyM.KerpelmanJ. (2010). Identity process and transformative pedagogy: Teachers as agents of identity formation. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 10, 76–91. doi:10.1080/15283481003711684
19.
HogganC. (2016). A typology of Transformation: Reviewing the transformative learning Literature. Studies in Adult Education, 48, 65–82. doi:10.1080/02660830.2016.1155849
20.
IllerisK. (2014). Transformative learning and identity. Journal of Transformative Education, 12, 148–163. doi:10.1177/1541344614548423
21.
JonesP. (2009). Teaching for Change in Social Work. A Discipline-Based Argument for the Use of Transformative Approaches to Teaching and Learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 7, 8–25. doi: 10.1177/1541344609338053
22.
KeganR. (2000). What ‘Form’ Transforms?: A Constructive-Developmental Perspective on Transformational Learning. In MezirowJ. and Associates (Eds.), Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
KingK. P. (2002). Educational technology professional development as transformative learning opportunities. Computers & Education, 39, 283–297.
24.
KitchehamA. (2008). The evolution of John Mezirow’s transformative learning Theory. Journal of Transformative Education, 6, 104–123. doi:10.1177/1541344608322678.
25.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
LeeM. Y.GreeneG. J. (2003). A teaching framework for transformative multicultural social work education. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity, 12, 1–28. doi:10.1300/J051v12n03_01
27.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
MezirowJ. (1981). A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education Quarterly, 32, 3–24. doi:10.1177/074171368103200101
30.
MezirowJ. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1, 58–63. doi:10.1177/1541344603252172
31.
MikkonenE.LaitinenM.HillC. (2016). Hierarchies of knowledge: Analyzing inequalities within the social work ethnographic research process as ethical notions in knowledge production. Qualitative Social Work, 16, 515–532. doi:10.1177/1473325016629542
32.
NogueirasG.IborraA.KunnenS. (2019). Experiencing transformative learning in a counseling masters’ course. A process-oriented case study with a focus on the emotional experience. Journal of Transformative Education, 17, 71–95. doi:10.1177/1541344618774022
33.
ReyesM. R.BrackettM. A.RiversS. E.WhiteM.SaloveyP. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 700–712. doi:10.1037/a0027268
34.
RichardsonJ. C.IceP. (2010). Investigating students’ level of critical thinking across instructional strategies in online discussions. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 52–59. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.009
35.
RobinsonA.LevacL. (2017). Transformative learning in developing as an engaged global citizen. Journal of Transformative Education, 16, 108–129. doi:10.1177/1541344617722634
36.
SamsonP. L. (2018). Critical thinking in social work education: A Delphi study of faculty understanding (Doctoral dissertation). University of Windsor, Canada. Retrieved fromhttps://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/7395
SohnB.PlaasK.FranklinK.DellardT.MurphyB.GreenbergK.…ThomasS. (2016). Freedom to connect: Insight into the existential dimension of transformative learning in a graduate seminar. Journal of Transformative Education, 14, 178–199. doi:10.1177/1541344616631425
39.
TaylorE. W. (1997). Building upon the theoretical debate: A critical review of the empirical studies of Mezirow’s transformative learning theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 34–59. doi:10.1177/074171369704800104
TsengH.GardnerT.YehH. T. (2016). Enhancing students’ self-efficacy, elaboration, and critical thinking skills in a collaborative educator preparation program. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17, 15–28.
42.
WoodrowK.CaruanaV. (2017). Preservice Teachers’ Perspective Transformations as Social Change Agents. Journal of Transformative Education, 15, 37–58. doi: 10.1177/1541344616655887
