This article aims at contributing to the development of teaching methodologies which can foster transformative learning in higher education. It presents a workshop experience, embedded in an undergraduate course, whereby active and dialogic methodology was designed to support the students in maturing self-awareness about their epistemologies and perspectives. The workshop used video narrative as language that allows exploration of the students’ assumptions and the cross-media portfolio to support the learning process in its unfolding. In the first part of the article, we introduce the theoretical frame and contextual premises of the workshop and our different contributions to this study. Then we describe our methodology, through its multiple—visual, narrative, reflective, and reflexive—layers. Finally, we use dialogue to analyze a student’s cross-media portfolio, as an in-depth example of the methodology employed. Our analysis illustrates the complexity and learning potential of this experience of transformative learning practices beyond self-report.
Alhadeff-JonesM. (2010). Challenging the limits of critique in education through Morin’s paradigm of complexity. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29, 477–490.
2.
Alhadeff-JonesM. (2012). Transformative learning and the challenges of complexity. In TaylorE.CrantonP.Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning. Theory, research, and practice (pp. 178–194). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BatesonG. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
4.
BatesonG. (1979). Mind and nature. A necessary unity. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
5.
BourdieuP. (1984) Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.
6.
BrooksJ. G. (2011). Bearing the weight: Discomfort as a necessary condition for “less violent” and more equitable dialogic learning. Educational Foundations, 25, 43–62.
7.
BrunerJ. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.
ClarkM. C. (2012). Transformation as embodied narrative. In TaylorP.CrantonE.Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning. Theory, research, and practice (pp. 425–438). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
ClarkeD. J.HollingsworthH. (2000). Seeing is understanding: Examining the merits of video and narrative cases. Journal of Staff Development, 21, 40–43.
11.
CrantonP.HogganC. (2012). Evaluating transformative learning. The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 520–535). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
12.
DavisB.SumaraD. (2006). Complexity and education. Inquiries into learning, teaching and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
DirkxJ. M. (2012). Nurturing soul work: A Jungian approach to transformative learning. In TaylorE.CrantonP.Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning. Theory, research, and practice (pp. 116–130). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
EdwardsR.BiestaG.ThorpeM. (Eds.). (2009). Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching. London, England: Routledge.
15.
FenwickT.EdwardsR. (2013). Performative ontologies. Sociomaterial approaches to researching adult education and lifelong learning. RELA European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 4, 49–63.
16.
FinneganF.MerrillB.ThunborgC. (Eds.). (2014). Student voices on inequalities in European higher education. Challenges for theory, policy and practice in a time of change. London, England: Routledge.
17.
FormentiL. (2011, May27–30). Metaphors, stories and the making of a satisfying theory: Transformational learning for professionals in education. In Alhadeff-JonesM.KokkosA. (Eds.), Transformative learning in time of crisis: Individual and collective challenges. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Transformative Learning (pp. 102–108), New York/Athens, Teachers College, Columbia University & the Hellenic Open University.
18.
FormentiL. (2014). Transformative learning and teaching in higher education. From evaluation to an embodied relational theory. In AndritsakouD.WestL. (Eds.), What’s the point of transformative learning? Proceedings of the First Network Conference Interrogating Transformative Processes in Learning and Education (ITPL) (pp. 68–80), ESREA & Hellenic Adult Education Association, Athens, Greece, June 27–29, 2014. Retrieved fromhttp://esrea-interrogating-tl-processes.com/proceedings-of-the-first-conference-of-the-network/.
19.
FormentiL. (2016). Storied identities. Biographically focused cooperative inquiry with future psychotherapists. In EvansR. (Ed.), Before, beside and after (Beyond) the biographical narrative (pp. 631–644). Duisburg, Germany: Nisaba Verlag.
20.
FormentiL. (2018). Complexity, adult biographies and co-operative transformation. In MilanaM.WebbS.HolfordJ.WallerR.JarvisP. (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook on adult and lifelong education and learning (pp. 191–209). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
FormentiL.WestL. (2016). The transformative potential of biographical research: Questions and answers in a community of learners. In Stories that make a difference. Exploring the collective, social and political potential of narratives in adult education research (pp. 9–19). Lecce, Italy: Pensa Multimedia.
22.
FormentiL.WestL.HorsdalM. (Eds.). (2014). Embodied narratives. Connecting stories, bodies, cultures and ecologies. Odense, DK: University of Southern Denmark Press.
23.
HaggisT. (2009). Beyond ‘mutual constitution’. Looking at learning and context from the perspective of complexity theory. In EdwardsR.BiestaG.ThorpeM. (Eds.), Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching (pp. 44–60). London, England: Routledge.
24.
HeronJ. (1996). Co-operative Inquiry: Research into the human condition. London, England: Sage.
25.
HuntC. (2013). Transformative learning through creative life writing. Exploring the self in the learning process. London, England: Routledge.
26.
HuntC.SampsonF. (2006). Writing. Self and reflexivity. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
HutcheonL. (2006). A theory of adaptation. New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
JarvisC. (2012). Fiction and film and transformative learning. In TaylorE.CrantonP.Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning. Theory, research, and practice (pp. 486–502). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
JorioF. (2016). Composing educators’ biographies. In EvansR. (Ed.), Before, beside and after (Beyond) the biographical narrative (pp. 249–264). Duisburg, Germany: Nisaba Verlang.
31.
KaslE.YorksL. (2012). Learning to be what we know: The pivotal role of presentational knowing in transformative learning. The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research and practice, 503–519.
32.
KaswormC. E.BowlesT. A. (2012). Fostering transformative learning in higher education settings. In TaylorE.CrantonP.Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning. Theory, research, and practice (pp. 388–407). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
33.
LawrenceR. L. (2012). Transformative learning through artistic expression: Getting out of our heads. In TaylorE.CrantonP.Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning. Theory, research, and practice (pp. 471–485). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34.
LeavyP. (2015). Method meets art. Arts-based research practice. New York, NY; London, England: Guilford Press.
MälkkiK. (2010). Building on Mezirow’s theory of transformative learning: Theorizing the challenges to reflection. Journal of Transformative Education, 8, 42–62.
37.
MälkkiK.GreenL. (2014), Navigational aids: The phenomenology of transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education. 12, 5–24.
38.
MaturanaH. (1990). The biological foundations of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In LuhmannN.. (Eds.), Beobachter. Konvergenz der erkenntnisttheorien?München, Germany: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
39.
MezirowJ. (2012). Learning to think like an adult. Core concepts of transformation theory. In TaylorE.CrantonP.Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning. Theory, research, and practice (pp. 73–95). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
MorinE. (1999). Seven complex lessons in education for the future. Paris, France: UNESCO.
41.
NorrisJ.SawyerR.LundD. (Eds.). (2012). Duoethnography. Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
42.
OsbergD.BiestaG. (Eds.). (2010). Complexity theory and the politics of education. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
43.
RoseG. (1993). Visual methodologies. An introduction to researching with visual materials. London, England: Sage.
44.
SchapiroS. A.WassermanI. L.GallegosP. V. (2012). Group work and dialogue. Spaces and processes for transformative learning in relationships. In TaylorE.CrantonP.Associates. The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 355–372). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
45.
SluzkiC. E.RansomD. (Eds.). (1976). Double bind: The foundation of communicational approach to the family. New York, NY: Grune and Stratton.
46.
TaylorE. (2009). Fostering transformative learning. In MezirowJ.TaylorE. W., & Associates (Eds.), Transformative learning in practice (pp. 3–17). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
47.
TisdellE. J. (2008). Critical media literacy and transformative learning. Drawing on pop culture and entertainment media in teaching for diversity in adult higher education. Journal of Transformative Education, 6, 48–67. San Francisco, CA: Sage.
48.
TylerJ. A.SwartzA. L. (2012). Storytelling and transformative learning. In TaylorE.CrantonP.Associates (Eds.). The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 455–470). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
49.
Von FoersterH. (1981). Observing systems. Seaside, CA: Intersystems.
