This case study investigates the transformative learning process and outcomes of a female master’s student in a semester-long counseling skills training course based on experiential learning. The data included the student’s longitudinal accounts (11 questionnaires on the emotions experienced in every session and three blog posts) and retrospective accounts (a final reflective written activity and an interview) of her experience in the course. Through a thematic holistic analysis, we identified (1) five phases in the student’s learning process, which illustrated her evolving meaning-making of the challenging demands and related changes in her emotional experience and (2) two learning outcomes, including the student’s insights into the meaning of learning and her increasing self-awareness. The findings are discussed with an emphasis on the value of tracking learners’ emotional experience to understand their transformative changes, the contribution of experiential approaches to trigger such changes, and the potential of a process-oriented approach to investigate transformation.
ArpiainenR. L.LackéusM.TäksM.TynjäläP. (2013). The sources and dynamics of emotions in entrepreneurship education learning process. Trames. A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 17, 331–346. doi:10.3176/tr.2013.4.02
2.
BatesonG. (1991). A sacred unity: Further steps to an ecology of mind. New York, NY: Dutton.
3.
BeardC.MälkkiK. (2013). Student transformation and the interaction between the epistemological and ontological tracks. In TirriK.KuusistoE. (Eds.), Interaction in educational domains (pp. 25–36). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
4.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
5.
BrunerJ. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.1119/1.1969598
6.
CrantonP.HogganC. (2012). Evaluating transformative learning. In TaylorE. W.CrantonP., and Associates, The Handbook of Transformative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 520–535). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
CrantonP.TaylorE. W. (2012). Transformative learning theory: Seeking a more unified theory. In TaylorE. W.CrantonP., and Associates, The Handbook of Transformative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 3–20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8.
CrantonP.WrightB. (2008). The transformative educator as learning companion. Journal of Transformative Education, 6, 33–47. doi:10.1177/1541344608316961
9.
DamasioA. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens. The body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York, NY: Hart Court Brace.
10.
DeCapuaA.MarshallH. W.FrydlandN. (2018). The transformational learning journey of a novice ESL teacher of low-literate adults. Journal of Transformative Education, 16, 17–38. doi:10.1177/1541344617704645
11.
DirkxJ. M. (2001). Images, transformative learning and the work of soul. Adult Learning, 12, 15–16. doi:10.1177/104515950101200306
DirkxJ.MezirowJ.CrantonP. (2006). Musings and reflections on the meaning, context, and process of transformative learning: A dialogue between John M. Dirkx and Jack Mezirow. Journal of Transformative Education, 4, 123–139. doi:10.1177/1541344606287503
14.
DirkxJ.PrattD.TaylorE. (2002). Archetypes of teaching: Tethers in the wind or flashlights in the dark? In PettittJ. M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Adult Education Research Conference (pp. 91–96). Raleigh: North Carolina State University.
15.
FormentiL.DirkxJ. (2014). A dialogical reframing. Journal of Transformative Education, 12, 123–133. doi:10.1177/1541344614554508
16.
FoulgerT. S. (2010). External conversations: An unexpected discovery about the critical friend in action research inquiries. Action Research, 8, 135–152. doi:10.1177/1476750309351354
17.
FullanaJ.PalliseraM.ColomerJ.Fernández PeñaR.Pérez-BurrielM. (2016). Reflective learning in higher education: A qualitative study on students’ perceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 1008–1022. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.950563
18.
HogganC. D. (2016). Transformative learning as a meta-theory: Definition, criteria, and typology. Adult Education Quarterly, 66, 57–75. doi:10.1177/0741713615611216
19.
IborraA.GarcíaL.MargalefL.PérezV. (2009). Generating collaborative contexts to promote learning and development. In LuzzattoE.DiMarcoG. (Eds.), Collaborative learning: Methodology, types of interactions and techniques (pp. 47–80). New York, NY: Nova Science.
20.
KaswormC. E.BowlesT. A. (2012). Fostering transformative learning in higher education settings. In TaylorE. W.CrantonP.Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 388–407). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21.
KeganR. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.
22.
KeganR. (2000). What ‘form’ transforms? In MezirowJ. (Ed.), Learning as transformation (pp. 35–70). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
KunnenE. S.Van GeertP. (2012). General characteristics of a dynamic systems approach. In KunnenE. S. (Ed.), A dynamic systems approach to adolescent development (pp. 15–34). London, England: Psychology Press.
24.
LarsonJ. M.FayM. (2016). Uncertainty management and sense making as precursors to transformative learning in an international immersion service-learning experience. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10, 1–8. doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2016.100106
MälkkiK. (2010). Building on Mezirow’s theory of transformative learning: Theorizing the challenges to reflection. Journal of Transformative Education, 8, 42–62. doi:10.1177/1541344611403315
27.
MälkkiK.GreenL. (2014). Navigational aids: The phenomenology of transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 12, 5–24. doi:10.1177/1541344614541171
28.
McAuliffeG. J. (2002). Student changes, program influences, and adult development in one program of counselor training: An exploratory inductive inquiry. Journal of Adult Development, 9, 205–216. doi:10.1023/A:1016004210506
29.
McCuskerP. (2013). Harnessing the potential of constructive developmental pedagogy to achieve transformative learning in social work education. Journal of Transformative Education, 11, 3–25. doi:10.1177/1541344613482522
McWhirterJ. (2011). Behavioral remodeling. In HallL. M.CharvetS. R. (Eds.), Innovations in NLP: For challenging times (pp. 95–114). Carmarthen, England: Crown House.
32.
MerriamS. B.KimS. (2012). Studying transformative learning. What methodology? In TaylorE. W.CrantonP., & Associates. The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research and practice (pp. 56–72). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
MezirowJ. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In MezirowJ. (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3–33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
35.
MurrellP. H. (2004). Continuing judicial education: Cognitive development as content, process, and outcome. Journal of Adult Development, 11, 151–161. doi:10.1023/B:JADE.0000024547.23923.5f
36.
NewmanM. (2012). Calling transformative learning into question: Some mutinous thoughts. Adult Education Quarterly, 62, 36–55. doi:10.1177/0741713610392768
37.
NogueirasG.HerreroD.IborraA. (2017). Teaching for epistemological change: Self-direction through self-assessment. In CanoE.IonG. (Eds.), Innovative practices for higher education assessment and measurement (pp. 207–225). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0531-0.ch011
38.
NogueirasG.IborraA. (2017). Understanding and promoting self-direction in freshman and master’s students: A qualitative approach. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 22, 394–404. doi:10.1037/bdb0000024
39.
NogueirasG.KunnenE. S.IborraA. (2017). Managing contextual complexity in an experiential learning course: A dynamic systems approach through the identification of turning points in students’ emotional trajectories. Frontiers Psychology, 8, 667. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00667
40.
PerryW. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
41.
PiagetJ. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.
42.
SchönD. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
43.
SlavichG. M.ZimbardoP. G. (2012). Transformational teaching: Theoretical underpinnings, basic principles, and core methods. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 569–608. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9199-6
44.
SmithB. (2017). Generalizability in qualitative research: Misunderstandings, opportunities and recommendations for the sport and exercise sciences. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 10, 137–149. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2017.1393221
45.
SohnB. K.PlaasK.FranklinK.DellardT.MurphyB.GreenbergK. H.…ThomasS. P. (2016). Freedom to connect: Insight into the existential dimension of transformative learning in a graduate seminar. Journal of Transformative Education, 14, 178–199. doi:10.1177/1541344616631425
46.
StakeR. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). London, England: Sage.
47.
TaylorE. W.CrantonP. (2013). A theory in progress? Issues in transformative learning theory. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 4, 33–47. doi:10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela5000
48.
TaylorE. W.LarosA. (2014). Researching the practice of fostering transformative learning: Lessons learned from the study of andragogy. Journal of Transformative Education, 12, 134–147. doi:10.1177/1541344614548589
49.
Van GeertP. (2003). Dynamic systems approaches and modeling of developmental processes. In ValsinerJ.ConnollyK. J. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 640–672). London, England: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781848608306.n28
50.
Van RossumE. J.HamerR. (2010). The meaning of learning and knowing. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
