Innovative and learner-centered approaches to teaching and learning are vital for the applied field of leadership education, yet little research exists on such pedagogical approaches within the field. Using a phenomenological approach in analyzing 26 students’ reflective narratives, the authors explore students’ experiences of and process of learning within a student-centered and inquiry-focused leadership capstone course. The process of this transformative learning experience is represented in five themes, which include the following: (1) challenging mental models of learning, (2) building trust, (3) finding freedom and empowerment, (4) deepening commitment to learning, and (5) reframing learning and self. Additionally, the students’ approach to learning changed throughout the course, shifting from dependence/independence toward interdependence. Implications for the use of this pedagogy and areas for future research are discussed.
ArgyrisC. (2002). Double-loop learning, teaching, and research. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1, 206–219.
2.
AstinA. W.AstinH. S. (2000). Leadership reconsidered: Engaging higher education in social change. Battle Creek, MI: W.K. Kellogg Foundation.
3.
Baxter MagoldaM. B. (2001). Making their own way: Narratives for transforming higher education to promote self-development. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
4.
BeckC. T. (1994). Reliability and validity issues in phenomenological research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 16, 254–267.
5.
BoyerE. L. (1997). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Stanford, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
6.
ColaizziP. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In ValleR. S.KingM. (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alterntives for psychology (pp. 48–71). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education [CAS]. (2009). CAS professional standards for higher education (7th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
8.
CrantonP. (1994). Understanding and promoting transformative learning: A guide for educators of adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
CrantonP.TaylorE. W. (2012). Transformative learning theory: Seeking a more unified theory. In TaylorE. W.CrantonP. (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 3–20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
CunninghamW. G.CordeiroP. A. (2006). Educational leadership: A problem-based approach (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
Daloz ParksS. (2005). Leadership can be taught. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
13.
DirkxJ. M. (1998). Transformative learning theory in the practice of adult education: An overview. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 7, 1–14.
14.
DuchB. J.GrohS. E.AllenD. E. (2001). Why problem-based learning? A case study of institutional change in undergraduate education. In DuchB. J.GrohS. E.AllenD. E. (Eds.), The power of problem-based learning (pp. 3–11). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
15.
DysonM. (2010). What might a person-centered model of teaching education look like in the 21st century? The transformism model of teacher education. Journal of Transformative Education, 8, 3–21.
16.
FreireP. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.
17.
HaydenC.MolenkampR. J. (2002). Tavistock primer II. Jupiter, FL: The A. K. Rice Institute.
18.
HeifetzR. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
HeifetzR. A.LinksyM. (2002). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
20.
KeelingR. P. (2004). Learning reconsidered: A campus-wide focus on the student experience. Washington, DC: NASPA and ACPA.
21.
KingP.KitchenerK. (1994). Developing reflective judgement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
KomivesS. R.DuganJ. P.OwenJ. E.SlackC.WagnerW. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook for student leadership development (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
KomivesS. R.OwenJ. E.LongerbeamS. D.MainellaF. C.OsteenL. (2005). Developing a leadership identity: A grounded theory. Journal of College Student Development, 46, 593–611.
24.
LaVanS. K.BeersJ. (2005). The role of cognerative dialogue in learning to teach and transforming learning environments. In TobinK.ElmeskyR.SeilerG. (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, and researchers (pp. 149–166). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
25.
MaherF. A.Thompson TetreaultM. K. (1994). The feminist classroom. New York, NY: Basic Books.
26.
McIntoshP. (2010). Action research and reflective practice: Creative and visual methods to facilitate reflection and learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
MezirowJ. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1, 58–63.
28.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
SengeP. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday Currency.
30.
ShepherdA.CosgriffB. (1998). Problem-based learning: A bridge between planning education and planning practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17, 348–357.
31.
SinghamM. (2007). Death to the syllabus!Liberal Education, 93, 52–56.
32.
StithI.RothW. M. (2010). Teaching as mediation: The cognerative dialogue and ethical understandingsTeaching and Teacher Education, 26, 363–370.
33.
ThomasI. (2009). Critical thinking, transformative learning, sustainable education, and problem-based learning in universities. Journal of Transformative Education, 7, 245–264.
34.
TillapaughD.Haber-CurranP. (2013). At the intersection of leadership and learning: A self-study of using student-centered pedagogies in the classroom. Educational Action Research, 21, 519–531.
35.
TobinK. (2006). Learning to teach through coteaching and cogenerative dialogue. Teaching Education, 17, 133–142.
36.
WeilerK. (1988). Women teaching for change: Gender, class, and power. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
37.
WheelanS. A. (2005). The developmental perspective. In WheelanS. A. (Ed.), The handbook for group research and practice (pp. 119–132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
