Probation is the most frequent disposition of juvenile delinquency cases and high rates of youth struggle to fulfill probation requirements. Parental involvement may play a significant role in shaping experiences on probation. Attorneys’ perspectives on the role of parental involvement and how training experiences inform their consideration of parent factors in disposition planning are essential to examine. Defense attorneys (N = 151) with past-year experience representing at least one juvenile client completed an online survey after reviewing a hypothetical probation case plan vignette for a youth client. Participants viewed a vignette with or without information about the youth’s parent. Attorneys strongly endorsed the importance of parental involvement in youth probation and recognized that many factors can impact involvement. Hours of training did not predict attitudes towards parental involvement, and such attitudes did not predict how attorneys handled the case plan. Access to parent-related information did inform perceptions of the plan’s appropriateness. Findings suggest trainings should focus on how attorneys can apply understanding of parental involvement to direct advocacy. Policy and practice reforms must promote supportive parental involvement in probation on a structural level.
AmaniB.MilburnN. G.LopezS.Young-BrinnA.CastroL.LeeA.BathE. (2018). Families and the juvenile justice system. Family & Community Health, 41(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000172
BendezúJ. J.PinderhughesE. E.HurleyS. M.McMahonR. J.RaczS. J. (2018). Longitudinal relations among parental monitoring strategies, knowledge, and adolescent delinquency in a racially diverse at-risk sample. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 47(sup1), S21–S34. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1141358
4.
BieneckS. (2009). How adequate is the vignette technique as a research tool for psycho-legal research? In OswaldM. E.BieneckS.Hupfeld-HeinemannJ. (Eds.), Social psychology of punishment of crime (pp. 255–271). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2023). Thematic analysis. In CooperH.CoutancheM. N.McMullenL. M.PanterA. T.RindskopfD.SherK. J. (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (2nd ed., pp. 65–81). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000319-004
6.
BurkeJ. D.MulveyE. P.SchubertC. A.GarbinS. R. (2014). The challenge and opportunity of parental involvement in juvenile justice services. Children and Youth Services Review, 39(April 2014), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.01.007
7.
CavanaghC.CauffmanE. (2017a). The longitudinal association of relationship quality and reoffending among first-time juvenile offenders and their mothers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(7), 1533–1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0679-3
8.
CavanaghC.CauffmanE. (2017b). What they don’t know can hurt them: Mothers’ legal knowledge and youth re-offending. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000112
9.
CohenA. O.CaseyB. J. (2014). Rewiring juvenile justice: The intersection of developmental neuroscience and legal policy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 63–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.002
10.
CookA. K.GordonJ. A. (2012). Get him out of my house: Parental competencies of juvenile probationers. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 10(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204011418352
DiClementeR. J.WingoodG. M.CrosbyR.SioneanC.CobbB. K.HarringtonK.DaviesS.Hook IIIE. W.OhM. K. (2001). Parental monitoring: Association with adolescents’ risk behaviors. Pediatrics, 107(6), 1363–1368. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.6.1363
14.
DirA. L.MageeL. A.CliftonR. L.OuyangF.TuW.WieheS. E.AalsmaM. C. (2020). The point of diminishing returns in juvenile probation: Probation requirements and risk of technical probation violations among first-time probation-involved youth. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 72(2), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000282
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
17.
FineA.DonleyS.CavanaghC.MiltimoreS.SteinbergL.FrickP. J.CauffmanE. (2017). And justice for all: Determinants and effects of probation officers’ processing decisions regarding first-time juvenile offenders. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000113
18.
FolkJ. B.KempK.YurasekA.Barr-WalkerJ.Tolou-ShamsM. (2021). Adverse childhood experiences among justice-involved youth: Data-driven recommendations for action using the sequential intercept model. American Psychologist, 76(2), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000769
19.
FountainE.WoolardJ. (2017). The capacity for effective relationships among attorneys, juvenile clients, and parents. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 14(2), 493–519.
20.
FountainE. N.MahmoudiD. (2020). Mapping juvenile justice: Identifying existing structural barriers to accessing probation services. American Journal of Community Psychology, 67(1-2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12474
21.
FountainE. N.WoolardJ. (2021). Negotiating with parents: Attorney practices in the juvenile plea bargain process. Law and Human Behavior, 45(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000439
22.
FreedmanD.ThorntonA.CamburnD.AlwinD.Young-demarcoL. (1988). The life history calendar: A technique for collecting retrospective data. Sociological Methodology, 18(1), 37–68.
23.
GavazziS. M.YarcheckC. M.RhineE. E.PartridgeC. R. (2003). Building bridges between the parole officer and the families of serious juvenile offenders: A preliminary report on a family-based parole program. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47(3), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X03047003004
24.
GoldsteinN. E. S.Gale-BentzE.McPheeJ.NeMoyerA.WalkerS.BishopS.SolerM.SzanyiJ.SchwartzR. G. (2019). Applying the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges’ resolution to juvenile probation reform. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 5(2), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000192
25.
GoldsteinN. E. S.NeMoyerA.Gale-BentzE.LevickM.FeiermanJ. (2016). “You’re on the right track!”: Using graduated response systems to address immaturity of judgment and enhance youths’ capacities to successfully complete probation. Temple Law Review, 88(4), 803–836.
26.
Haney-CaronE.BakerS. (2021). Juvenile probation reform: Moving from surveillance to effective intervention. In JeglicE.CalkinsC. (Eds.), Handbook of issues in criminal justice reform in the United States (pp. 307–334). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77565-0_17
HenningK. (2017). Race, paternalism, and the right to counsel. American Criminal Law Review, 54(1), 649.
29.
HenningK. N. (2006). It takes a lawyer to raise a child? Allocating responsibilities among parents, children, and lawyers in delinquency cases. Georgetown Law: Faculty Publications, 6 Nev. L. J, 214(1), 836–889. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7232-1044c
HoeveM.DubasJ. S.EichelsheimV. I.Van Der LaanP. H.SmeenkW.GerrisJ. R. M. (2009). The relationship between parenting and delinquency: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(6), 749–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9310-8
32.
HoeveM.StamsG. J. J. M.Van Der PutC. E.DubasJ. S.Van Der LaanP. H.GerrisJ. R. M. (2012). A meta-analysis of attachment to parents and delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40(5), 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9608-1
33.
KapoorA.Peterson-BadaliM.SkillingT. (2018). Barriers to service provision for justice-involved youth. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(12), 1832–1851. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818794754
34.
KerrM.StattinH.BurkW. J. (2010). A reinterpretation of parental monitoring in longitudinal perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(1), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00623.x
35.
KokkaleraS. S.TallasA.GogginK. (2021). Contextualizing the impact of legal representation on juvenile delinquency outcomes: A review of research and policy. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 72(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12192
36.
LehmannP. S.PickettJ. T.RyonS. B.KosloskiA. E. (2019). Race, juvenile transfer, and sentencing preferences: Findings from a randomized experiment. Race and Justice, 9(3), 251–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368717699674
37.
MaschiT.SchwalbeC.RistowJ. (2013). In pursuit of the ideal parent in juvenile justice: A qualitative investigation of probation officers’ experiences with parents of juvenile offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 52(7), 470–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2013.829898
NeMoyerA.Gale-BentzE.DurhamK.WagageS.GoldsteinN. E. S. (2020). Adverse juvenile probation supervision outcomes: Noncompliance, revocation, and failure to appear at review hearings. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(2), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854819889077
41.
NeMoyerA.GoldsteinN. E. S.McKittenR. L.PrelicA.EbbeckeJ.FosterE.BurkardC. (2014). Predictors of juveniles’ noncompliance with probation requirements. Law and Human Behavior, 38(6), 580–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000083
42.
NeMoyerA.HollidayS. B.GoldsteinN. E. S.McKittenR. L. (2016). Predicting probation revocation and residential facility placement at juvenile probation review hearings: Youth-specific and hearing-specific factors. Law and Human Behavior, 40(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000162
43.
PaikL. (2017). Good parents, bad parents: Rethinking family involvement in juvenile justice. Theoretical Criminology, 21(3), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480616649430
44.
PerezN. M.JenningsW. G.BaglivioM. T. (2018). A path to serious, violent, chronic delinquency: The harmful aftermath of adverse childhood experiences. Crime & Delinquency, 64(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716684806
45.
PieterseD.KimB. K. E.KlomhausA.ComuladaW. S.LópezS. A.BathE.AmaniB.MyersB.SemaanA.MilburnN. G. (2022). PTSD Among families of juvenile justice-involved youth: Relation to mental, emotional, and behavioral health problems. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 31(7), 1947–1956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-022-02302-4
ShapiroL. (2020). The crippling costs of the juvenile justice system: A legal and policy argument for eliminating fines and fees for youth offenders. Emory Law Journal, 69(6), 1305–1349.
48.
TobeyA.GrissoT.SchwartzR. G. (2000). Youths’ trial participation as seen by youths and their attorneys: An exploration of competence-based issues. In GrissoT.SchwartzR. G. (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 225–242). University of Chicago Press.
49.
VidalS.WoolardJ. (2016). Parents’ perceptions of juvenile probation: Relationship and interaction with juvenile probation officers, parent strategies, and youth’s compliance on probation. Children and Youth Services Review, 66(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.04.019
50.
WalkerS. C.BishopA. S.PullmannM. D.BauerG. (2015). A research framework for understanding the practical impact of family Involvement in the juvenile justice system: The Juvenile Justice Family Involvement Model. American Journal of Community Psychology, 56(3–4), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9755-6
