Unraveling the Bidirectional Relationship Between Bullying Victimization and Perpetration: A Test of Mechanisms From Opportunity and General Strain Theories

Abstract

This study tested two theories designed to explain the bullying perpetration–victimization relationship. Peer delinquency was hypothesized to mediate the pathway from bullying perpetration to victimization, in line with opportunity, lifestyle, and routine activities theories, and anger was held to mediate the pathway from bullying victimization to perpetration as set forth in general strain theory. These pathways were tested in a sample of 3,411 youth (1,728 boys, 1,683 girls) from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. A causal mediation analysis performed on three nonoverlapping waves of data, in which prior levels of each predicted variable were controlled, uncovered support for peer delinquency as a mediator of the perpetration–victimization pathway but failed to identify anger as a mediator of the victimization–perpetration pathway. Additional research is required to identify a mediator for the victimization–perpetration pathway and determine whether variables other than peer delinquency mediate the perpetration–victimization pathway.

Keywords

bullying perpetration and victimization opportunity theory general strain theory person proximity peer delinquency anger

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agnew

(1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47–87.

Agnew

Brezina

Wright

J. P.

Cullen

F. T.

(2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40, 43–72.

Akers

R. L.

(1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Northeastern University Press.

Allison

P. D.

(2002). Missing data. Sage.

Australian Institute of Family Studies. (2018). Longitudinal study of Australian children data user guide—December 2018. Author.

Baek

Roberts

A. M.

Seepersad

Swartz

(2019). Examining negative emotions as mediators between exposures to family violence and bullying: A gendered perspective. Journal of School Violence, 18, 440–454.

Baldry

A. C.

Farrington

D. P.

(2000). Bullies and delinquents: Personal characteristics and parental styles. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 10, 17–31.

Broidy

L. M.

(2001). A test of general strain theory. Criminology, 39, 9–35.

Chan

H. C. O.

Wong

D. S. W.

(2015). The overlap between school bullying perpetration and victimization: Assessing the psychological, familial, and school factors of Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 3224–3234.

10.

Cicchetti

Murray-Close

Huitsing

Snijders

T. A. B.

Van Duijn

M. A. J.

Veenstra

(2014). Victims, bullies, and their defenders: A longitudinal study of the coevolution of positive and negative networks. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 645–659.

11.

Cohen

Felson

(1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.

12.

Cole

D. A.

Maxwell

S. E.

(2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577.

13.

Elwert

Winship

(2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 31–53.

14.

Fishman

Mesch

G. S.

Eisikovits

(2002). Variables affecting adolescent victimization: Findings from a National Youth Survey. Western Criminology Review, 3(2). http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v3n2/fishman.html

15.

Frias

S. M.

Finkelhor

(2017). Victimizations of Mexican youth (12–17 years old): A 2014 national survey. Child Abuse & Neglect, 67, 86–97.

16.

Garofalo

(1987). Reassessing the lifestyle model of criminal victimization. In Gottfredson

M. R.

Hirschi

(Eds.), Positive criminology (pp. 23–42). Sage.

17.

Gottfredson

M. R.

Hirschi

(1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.

18.

Hamby

Finkelhor

Turner

(2013). Perpetrator and victim gender patterns for 21 forms of youth victimization in the National Survey of Children’s Exposure to Violence. Violence & Victims, 28, 915–939.

19.

Hayes

A. F.

(2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford.

20.

Haynie

D. L.

Osgood

D. W.

(2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces, 84, 1109–1130.

21.

Holt

M. K.

Kantor

G. K.

Finkelhor

(2009). Parent/child concordance about bullying involvement and family characteristics related to bullying and peer victimization. Journal of School Violence, 8, 42–63.

22.

Ignatans

Pease

(2019). Are victims of crime mostly angry or mostly afraid? Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 21, 314–324.

23.

Jennings

W. G.

Piquero

A. R.

Reingle

J. M.

(2012). On the overlap between victimization and offending: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 16–26.

24.

Kenny

D. A.

(2013). Mediation: Sensitivity analysis [Webinar] . http://davidakenny.net/webinars/Mediation/Sensitivity/Sensitivity.html

25.

Kenny

D. A.

Judd

C. M.

(2014). Power anomalies in testing mediation. Psychological Science, 25, 334–339.

26.

Kiesner

Poulin

Nicotra

(2003). Peer relations across contexts: Individual-network homophily and network inclusion in and after school. Child Development, 74, 1328–1343.

27.

Lebrun-Harris

L. A.

Sherman

L. J.

Limber

S. P.

Miller

B. D.

Edgerton

E. A.

(2019). Bullying victimization and perpetration among U.S. children and adolescents: 2016 National Survey of Children’s Health. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 2543–2557.

28.

Lucia

(2016). Correlates of bullying in Switzerland. European Journal of Criminology, 13, 50–66.

29.

Moon

Jang

S. J.

(2014). A general strain approach to psychological and physical bullying: A study of interpersonal aggression at school. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 2147–2171.

30.

Muthén

(1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

31.

O’Brennan

L. M.

Bradshaw

C. P.

Sawyer

A. L.

(2009). Examining developmental differences in the social-emotional problems among frequent bullies, victims, and bully/victims. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 100–115.

32.

Connolly

E. J.

(2019). Anger as a mediator between peer victimization and deviant behavior in South Korea: A cross-cultural application of general strain theory. Crime & Delinquency, 65, 1102–1122.

33.

Peguero

A. A.

(2009). Opportunity, involvement, and student exposure to school violence. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7, 299–312.

34.

Pellegrini

A. D.

Bartini

Brooks

(1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 216–224.

35.

Popp

A. M.

(2012). The effects of exposure, proximity, and capable guardians on the risk of bullying victimization. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 10, 315–332.

36.

Preacher

K. J.

(2015). Advances in mediation analysis: A survey and synthesis of new developments. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 825–852.

37.

Preacher

K. J.

Hayes

A. F.

(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.

38.

Saricam

Cetinkaya

(2018). Exploring revenge as a mediator between bullying and victimization in gifted and talented students. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 6, 102–111.

39.

Shadish

W. R

Cook

T. D.

Campbell

D. T.

(2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Mifflin.

40.

Sigfusdottir

I. D.

Gudjonsson

G. H.

Sigurdsson

J. F.

(2010). Bullying and delinquency: The mediating role of anger. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 391–396.

41.

Thomas

K. J.

McGloin

J. M.

(2013). A dual-systems approach for understanding differential susceptibility to processes of peer influence. Criminology, 51, 435–447.

42.

Ttofi

M. M.

Farrington

D. P.

Lösel

Loeber

(2011). The predictive efficacy of school bullying versus later offending: A systematic/meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21, 80–89.

43.

U.S. Department of Education. (2019, July). Student reports of bullying: Results from the 2017 School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCES 2019-054) . Author.

44.

Walters

G. D.

(2018). PM effect size estimation for mediation analysis: A cautionary note, alternate strategy, and real data illustration. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21, 25–33.

45.

Walters

G. D.

(2020a). Mediating the victim–offender overlap with delinquent peer associations: A preliminary test of the person proximity hypothesis. Criminal Justice Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2020.1711752

46.

Walters

G. D.

(2020b). School-age bullying victimization and perpetration: A meta-analysis of prospective studies and research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020906513

47.

Walters

G. D.

Espelage

D. L.

(2018). From victim to victimizer: Hostility, anger, and depression as mediators of the bullying victimization–bullying perpetration association. Journal of School Psychology, 68, 73–83.

48.

Wemmers

J.-A.

Cyr

Chamberland

Lessard

Collin-Vézina

Clément

M.-E.

(2018). From victimization to criminalization: General strain theory and the relationship between poly-victimization and delinquency. Victims & Offenders, 13, 542–557.

49.

Wojciechowski

T. W.

(2019). Victimization recency, development of anger, and violent offending in early adulthood: A developmental test of general strain theory. Deviant Behavior, 40, 866–881.

50.

A. D.

Zumbo

B. D.

(2008). Understanding and using mediators and moderators. Social Indicators Research, 87, 367–392.

51.

Macrynikola

Waseem

Miranda

(2020). Racial and ethnic differences in bullying: Review and implications for intervention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 50. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.101340

52.

Young

J. T. N.

Rebellon

C. J.

Barnes

J. C.

Weerman

F. M.

(2013). Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology, 52, 60–86.