Scholars have tested Becker’s master status thesis on criminal justice system outcomes, yet have been unable to disentangle the label from behavioral characteristics. To clarify the effects of labels, we used archival juvenile court data to test Becker’s master status through the effects of gang affiliation on case disposition. Stratified multivariate regression models revealed consistent effects of predictors—mental health needs, offenses per case, felony offense, and pretrial detention—on case referral to juvenile court across the gang-affiliated demarcation. The static effects of legal predictors across the gang demarcation levy questions about the legal consequences of labels.
BarrickK. (2014). A review of prior tests of labeling theory. In FarringtonD. P.Murray’sJ. (Eds.), Labeling theory empirical tests: Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 18, pp. 89–112). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
2.
BeckerH. S. (1963). The outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York, NY: The Free Press.
3.
BendaB. B.TollettC. L. (1999). A study of recidivism of serious and persistent offenders among adolescents. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 111–126.
4.
BlackD. (1976). The Behavior of Law. New York, NY: Academic Press.
5.
BlackburnA. G.TrulsonC. R. (2010). Sugar and spice and everything nice? Exploring institutional misconduct among serious and violent female delinquents. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1132–1140.
6.
BrameR.PaternosterR.MazerolleP.PiqueroA. (1998). Testing for the equality of maximum-likelihood regression coefficients between two independent equations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 245–261.
7.
BrownfieldD.SorensonA. M.ThompsonK. M. (2001). Gang membership, race, and social class: A test of the group hazard and master status hypotheses. Deviant Behavior, 22, 73–89.
8.
CaudillJ. W. (2010). Back on the swagger: Institutional release and recidivism timing among gang affiliates. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8, 58–70.
9.
CaudillJ. W.MorrisR. G.El SayedS.YunM.DeLisiM. (2013). Pathways through the juvenile justice system: Predictors of formal disposition. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11, 183–195.
10.
CaudillJ. W.TrulsonC. R.MarquartJ. W.DeLisiM. (2017). On gang affiliation, gang databases, and prosecutorial outcomes. Crime & Delinquency, 63, 210–229.
11.
CurryG. D. (2000). Self-reported gang involvement and officially recorded delinquency. Criminology, 38, 1253–1274.
12.
DeckerS.Kempf-LeonardK. (1991). Constructing gangs: The social definition of youth activities. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 5, 271–291.
13.
DeckerS. H.MeldeC.PyroozD. C. (2013). What do we know about gangs and gang members and where do we go from here?Justice Quarterly, 30, 369–402.
14.
DeLisiM.BarnesJ. C.BeaverK. M.GibsonC. L. (2009). Delinquent gangs and adolescent victimization revisited a propensity score matching approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 808–823.
15.
DeLisiM.SpruillJ. O.PetersD. J.CaudillJ. W.TrulsonC. R. (2013). “Half in, half out:” Gang families, gang affiliation, and gang misconduct. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 602–615.
16.
DongB.KrohnM. D. (2016). Escape from violence: What reduces the enduring consequences of adolescent gang affiliation?Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 41–50.
17.
DooleyB. D.SealsA.SkarbekD. (2014). The effect of prison gang membership on recidivism. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 267–275.
18.
DruryA. J.DeLisiM. (2011). Gangkill: An exploratory empirical assessment of gang membership, homicide offending, and prison misconduct. Crime & Delinquency, 57, 130–146.
19.
EliasonS. R. (1993). Maximum likelihood estimation: Logic and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
EsbensenF.HuizingaD. (1993). Gangs, drugs, and delinquency in a survey of urban youth. Criminology, 31, 565–589.
21.
FoxK. A.LaneJ. (2010). Perceptions of gangs among prosecutors in an emerging gang city. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 595–603.
22.
GibsonC. L.SwattM. L.MillerJ. M.JenningsW. G.GoverA. R. (2012). The causal relationship between gang joining and violent victimization: A critical review and directions for future research. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 490–501.
23.
GilmanA. B.HillK. G.HawkinsJ. D.HowellJ. C.KostermanR. (2014). The developmental dynamics of joining a gang in adolescence: Patterns and predictors of gang membership. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24, 204–219.
24.
GottfredsonM. R.GottfredsonD. M. (1988). Decision making in criminal justice: Toward the rational exercise of discretion (2nd). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
25.
HoebenE. M.MeldrumR. C.WalkerD.YoungJ. T. N. (2016). The role of peer delinquency and unstructured socializing in explaining delinquency and substance use: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 108–122.
26.
HuebnerB. M.VaranoS. P.BynumT. S. (2007). Gangs, guns, and drugs: Recidivism among serious, young offenders. Criminology and Public Policy, 6, 187–222.
27.
HughesE. C. (1945). Dilemmas and contradictions of status. The American Journal of Sociology, 50, 353–359.
28.
JacksonD. B.HayC. (2013). The conditional impact of official labeling on subsequent delinquency considering the attenuating role of family attachment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 300–322.
29.
JacobsJ. B. (2009). Gang databases: Context and questions. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 705–709.
30.
JohnsonC. M.WebsterB. A.ConnorsE. F.SaenzD. J. (1995). Gang enforcement problems and strategies: National survey findings. Journal of Gang Research, 3, 1–18.
31.
KatzC. M.WebbV. J.SchaeferD. R. (2000). The validity of police gang intelligence lists: Examining differences in delinquency between documented gang members and non-documented delinquent youth. Police Quarterly, 3, 413–437.
32.
KennedyD. (2009). Gangs and public policy: Constructing and deconstructing gang databases. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 711–716.
33.
KleinM. (1995). The American street gang. New York, NY: Aldine.
34.
LemertE. M. (1951). Social pathology: A systematic approach to the theory of sociopathic behavior. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
35.
LemertE. M. (1967). Human deviance, social problems and social control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
36.
MaxsonC. L.HenniganK. M.SloaneD. C. (2005). “It’s getting crazy out there”: Can a civil gang injunction change a community?Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 501–530.
37.
McCorkleR. C.MietheT. D. (1998). The political and organizational response to gangs: An examination of a “moral panic” in Nevada. Justice Quarterly, 15, 41–64.
38.
MerrinG. J.HongJ. S.EspelageD. L. (2015). Are the risk and protective factors similar for gang-involved, pressured-to-join, and non-gang-involved youth? A social-ecological analysis. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 85, 522.
39.
MietheT. D.McCorkleR. C. (1997). Gang membership and criminal processing: A test of the “master status” concept. Justice Quarterly, 14, 407–427.
40.
O’NealE. N.DeckerS. H.MouleR. K.PyroozD. C. (2016). Girls, gangs, and getting out: Gender differences and similarities in leaving the gang. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 14, 43–60.
41.
OzkanT. (2016). Reoffending among serious juvenile offenders: A developmental perspective. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 18–31.
42.
PaternosterR.BrameR.MazerolleP.PiqueroA. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859–866.
43.
PullmannM. D.KerbsJ.KoroloffN.Weach-WhiteE.GaylorR.SielerD. (2006). Juvenile offenders with mental health needs: Reducing recidivism using wraparound. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 375–397.
44.
PyroozD. C. (2014). “From your first cigarette to your last dyin’day”: The patterning of gang membership in the life-course. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 349–372.
45.
PyroozD. C.TuranovicJ. J.DeckerS. H.WuJ. (2016). Taking stock of the relationship between gang membership and offending: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 365–397.
46.
PyroozD. C.WolfeS. E.SpohnC. (2011). Gang-related homicide charging decisions: The implementation of a specialized prosecution unit in Los Angeles. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22, 3–26.
47.
SheldenR. G.SnodgrassT.SnodgrassP. (1992). Comparing gang and non-gang offenders: Some tentative findings. Gang Journal, 1, 73–86.
48.
SpergelI. (2009). Editorial introduction: Gang databases—To be or not to be. Criminology and Public Policy, 8, 667–674.
49.
ThomasC. W.BishopD. M. (1984). The effect of formal and informal sanctions on delinquency: A longitudinal comparison of labeling and deterrence theories. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 1222–1245.
50.
ThornberryT. P.KrohnM. D.LizotteA. J.Chard-WierschemD. (1993). The role of juvenile gangs in facilitating delinquent behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 55–87.
51.
TrulsonC. R.MarquartJ. W.MullingsJ. L.CaetiT. J. (2005). In between adolescence and adulthood: Recidivism outcomes of a cohort of state delinquents. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 3, 355–387.
52.
VenkateshS. A. (2008). Gang leader for a day: A rogue sociologist takes to the streets. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
53.
VoisinD. R.KingK. M.DiclementeR. J.CarryM. (2014). Correlates of gang involvement and health-related factors among African American females with a detention history. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 120–125.
54.
WardJ. T.KrohnM. D.GibsonC. L. (2014). The effects of police contact on trajectories of violence a group-based, propensity score matching analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 440–475.
55.
WatkinsA. M.TaylorT. J. (2016). The prevalence, predictors, and criminogenic effect of joining a gang among urban, suburban, and rural youth. Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 133–142.
56.
WebbV.KatzC.DeckerS. (2005). Assessing the validity of self-reports by gang members: Results from the arrestee drug-abuse monitoring program. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 232–252.
57.
ZatzM. (1985). Los Cholos: Legal processing of Chicano gang members. Social Problems, 33, 13–30.
58.
ZhangL.WelteJ. W.WieczorekW. F. (1999). Youth gangs, drug use, and delinquency. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 101–109.
