As violence and crime within and around U.S. schools has drawn increased attention to school security, police, surveillance cameras, and other measures have grown commonplace at public schools. Social scientists commonly voice concern that exclusionary security measures are most common in schools attended by poor and non-White students, yet there is little empirical basis for assessing the extent of differential exposure, as we lack research on how exclusionary measures are distributed relative to school and student characteristics. To address this gap in the research, we use nationally representative school-level data from the School Survey on Crime and Safety to consider the security measures employed in elementary, middle, and high schools. Results indicate that while security measures are ubiquitous in U.S. high schools, those considered more exclusionary are concentrated in elementary, middle, and high schools attended by non-White and/or poorer students.
ArumR.2003. Judging school discipline: The crisis of moral authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
ArumR.VelezM. (2012). Improving learning outcomes: School discipline and student achievement in comparative perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3.
AyersW.DohrnB.AyersR. (eds.). (2001). Zero tolerance: Resisting the drive for punishment in our schools. New York, NY: New Press.
4.
BarkerV. (2009). The politics of imprisonment: How the democratic process shapes the way America punishes offenders. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
BauerL.TangS.DerbyT. L.ParmerR. J.SwaimN. L. (2007). School survey on crime and safety: 2005–06 data file user’s manual (NCES 2007-358). Washington, DC:National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
6.
BlankenauJ.LeeperM. (2003). Public school search policies and the ‘Politics of Sin’Policy Studies Journal, 31, 565–584.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ. (translated by Richard Nice). (1990). Reproduction in education, society, and culture (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
BowditchC. (1993). Getting rid of troublemakers: High school disciplinary procedures and the production of dropouts. Social Problems, 41, 493–509.
10.
BowlesS.GintisH. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
11.
BradyK. P.BalmerS.PhenixD. (2007). School-police partnership effectiveness in urban schools.” Education and Urban Society, 39, 455–478.
12.
BrooksK.SchiraldiV.ZiedenbergJ. (2000). School house hype: Two years later. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute.
13.
BurnsR.CrawfordC. (1999). School shootings, the media, and public rear: Ingredients for a moral panic. Crime, Law and Social Panic, 32, 147–168.
14.
CasellaR. (2001). Being down: Challenging violence in urban schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
15.
CasellaR. (2006). Selling us the fortress: The promotion of techno-security equipment for schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
CohenS. (1985). Visions of social control: Crime, punishment and classification. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
17.
CornellD. G.(2006). School violence: Fears versus facts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
DaviesS.TannerJ. (2003). The long arm of the law: Effects of labeling on employment. The Sociological Quarterly, 44, 385–404.
19.
DevineJ. (1996). Maximum security: The culture of violence in inner-city schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
20.
DowneyD. B.PribeshS. (2004). When race matters: Teachers’ evaluations of students’ behavior. Sociology of Education, 77, 267–282.
21.
EberhardtJ. L.GoffP. A.PurdieV. J.DaviesP. G. (2004). Seeing black: Race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 876–893.
22.
EitleT. M.EitleD. J. (2004). Inequality, segregation, and the overrepresentation of African Americans in school suspensions. Sociological Perspectives, 47, 269–287.
23.
FabeloT.ThompsonM.PlotkinM.CarmichalD.MarchbanksM.BoothE. (2011). Breaking schools’ rules: A statewide study of how school discipline relates to students’ success and juvenile justice involvement. New York, NY: Council of State Governments Justice Center and Public Policy Research Institute.
24.
FergusonA. A. (2000). Bad boys: Public schools and the making of black masculinity. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
25.
FoucaultM. (transl. by SheridanAlan). (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
26.
GottfredsonD. C. (2001). Schools and delinquency. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
GottfredsonD. C.DiPietroS.M. (2011). School size, social capital, and student victimization. Sociology of Education, 84, 69–89.
28.
GottfredsonG. D.GottfredsonD. C.PayneA. A.GottfredsonN. C. (2005). School climate predictors of school disorder: Results from a national study of delinquency prevention in schools. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 412–444.
29.
HirschfieldP. (2008). Preparing for prison: The criminalization of school discipline in the USA. Theoretical Criminology, 12, 79–101.
30.
HirschfieldP. (2010). School surveillance in America: Disparate and unequal. In MonahanT.TorresR. D. (eds.), Schools under surveillance: Cultures of control in public education (pp. 38–54). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
31.
HjalmarssonR. (2008). Criminal justice involvement and high school completion. Journal of Urban Economics, 63, 613–630.
32.
IrwinK.DavidsonJ.Hall-SanchezA. (2013) The race to punish in American schools: Class and race predictors of punitive school-crime control. Critical Criminology, 21, 47–71.
33.
KimC. Y.LosenD. J.HewittD. T. (2010). The school-to-prison pipeline: Structuring legal reform. New York: NYU Press.
34.
KozolJ. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
35.
KupchikA. (2009). Things are tough all over: Race, ethnicity, class, and school discipline. Punishment & Society, 11, 291–317.
36.
KupchikA. (2010). Homeroom security: School discipline in an age of fear. New York: NYU Press.
37.
KupchikA.MonahanT. (2006). The new American school: Preparation for post-industrial discipline. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27, 617–632.
38.
LareauAnnette. 2003. Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
39.
LawrenceR. (2006). School crime and juvenile justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40.
LawrenceR.MuellerD. (2003). School shootings and the man-bites-dog criterion of newsworthiness. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1, 330–345.
41.
Levine-RaskyC. (2009). Dynamics of parent involvement at a multicultural school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30, 331–344.
42.
LewisA. E. (2006). Race in the schoolyard: Negotiating the color line in classrooms and communities. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
43.
LewisR.RomiS.KatzY. J.QuiX. (2008). Students’ reaction to classroom discipline in Australia, Israel, and China. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 715–724.
44.
LohmanJ.ShephardA. (2006). School security technologies(Office of Legislative Research Report (2006-R-0668)). Hartford, CT: Connecticut General Assembly.
45.
LynchM. P. (2009). Sunbelt justice: Arizona and the transformation of American punishment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
46.
LyonsW.DrewJ. (2006). Punishing schools: Fear and citizenship in American public education. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
47.
MillerL. (2008). The perils of federalism: Race, poverty, and the politics of crime control. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
48.
MonahanT.TorresR. (eds.). (2010). Schools under surveillance: Cultures of control in public education. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
49.
MorrisE. W. (2005). ‘Tuck in that shirt!’ Race, class, gender, and discipline in an urban school. Sociological Perspectives, 48, 25–48.
50.
MukherjeeE. (2007). Criminalizing the classroom: The over-policing of New York City schools. New York, NY: New York Civil Liberties Union
51.
NogueraP. (2003). City schools and the American dream: Reclaiming the promise of public education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
52.
NolanK. (2011). Police in the hallway: Discipline in an urban high school. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
53.
PayneA. A.WelchK., (2010). Modeling the effects of racial threat on punitive and restorative school discipline practices. Criminology, 48, 1019–1062.
54.
PegueroA. A. (2011). Immigration, schools, and violence: Assimilation and student misbehavior. Sociological Spectrum, 31, 695–717.
55.
PickettJ.ChiricosT. (2012). Controlling other people's children: Racialized views of delinquency and whites’ punitive attitudes toward offenders. Criminology, 50, 673–710.
56.
RenzulliL. A.ParrottH. M.BeattieI. R. (2011). Racial mismatch and school type: Teacher satisfaction and retention in charter and traditional public schools. Sociology of Education, 84, 23–48.
57.
RistR. C. (1973). The urban school: A factory for failure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58.
RobersS.ZhangJ.TrumanJ.SnyderT. D. (2012). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2011. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs (NCES 2012-002; NCJ 236021).
59.
SimmonsL. (2007). The public school, the prison and the bottom line: Expenditure and expediency. Paper presented at American Sociological Association annual meeting, New York, NY.
60.
SimonJ. (2007). Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
61.
SkibaR. J.MichaelR. S.NardoA. C.PetersonR. (2000). The color of ciscipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. Indiana Education Policy Center, Research Report SRS1.
62.
SkibaR.ReynoldsC. R.GrahamS.SherasP.ConoleyJ. C.Garcia-VazquezE. (2006). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations (Report by the American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
63.
SweetenG. (2006). Who will graduate? Disruption of high school graduation by arrest and court involvement. Justice Quarterly, 23, 462–480.
64.
United States Congress. (2000). H.R. 4108, Report No. 106-718. 106th Congress, 2d Session.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T. (2010). The social sources of Americans’ punitiveness: A test of three competing models. Criminology, 48, 99–130.
67.
WacquantL. (2001). Deadly symbiosis: When ghetto and prison meet and mesh. In GarlandD. (Ed.), Mass imprisonment: Social causes and consequences (pp. 82–120). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.
WaldJ.LosenD. J. (eds.). (2003). Deconstructing the school-to-prison pipeline: New directions for youth development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
69.
WebberJ. A. (2003). Failure to hold: The politics of school violence. New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.
70.
WeisL. (1992). Working class without work: High school students in a de-industrializing economy. New York, NY: Routledge.
71.
WelchK.PayneA. A. (2010). Racial threat and punitive school discipline. Social Problems, 57, 25–48.
72.
WelchK.PayneA. A. (2012). Exclusionary school punishment: The effect of racial threat on expulsion and suspension. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 10, 155–171.
73.
WelshW. N. (2003). Individual and institutional predictors of school disorder. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1, 346–368.
74.
WesternB. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
75.
YoungJ. (1999). The exclusive society: Social exclusion, crime and difference in late modernity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
