This study examined the individual functioning, interpersonal relations, and academic performance of 142 female adolescents who were divided into three demographically similar groups: violent juvenile offenders (n = 51), nonviolent juvenile offenders (n = 56), and nondelinquent youths (ND; n = 35). Both the violent and the nonviolent offenders had histories of serious crimes (i.e., felonies). Parents and youths completed self-report instruments, behavior-rating inventories, and a videorecorded interaction task, and teachers completed a rating measure. Results showed that violent juvenile offenders and nonviolent juvenile offenders had more behavior problems, more difficulties in family and peer relations, and poorer academic performance than did ND. However, violent juvenile offenders did not differ from nonviolent juvenile offenders on any of the measures of individual functioning, family relations, peer relations, or academic performance. Taken together, the findings suggest that girls who commit serious crimes, regardless of whether violence is involved, share a number of risk factors across key domains of individual and interpersonal functioning. The implications of these findings for research, theory, and treatment are discussed.
AgnewR. (2009). The contribution of “mainstream” theories to the explanation of female delinquency. In ZahnM. A. (Ed.), The delinquent girl (pp. 7–29). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
2.
ArigaM.UeharaT.TakeuchiK.IshigeY.NakanoR.MikuniM. (2008). Trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder in delinquent female adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 79–87. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01817.x
3.
ArmisteadL.WiersonM.ForehandR.FrameC. (1992). Psychopathology in incarcerated juvenile delinquents: Does it extend beyond externalizing problems?Adolescence, 27, 309–314. Retrieved fromhttp://www.eric.ed.gov/
4.
BernburgJ. G.KrohnM. D.RiveraC. J. (2006). Official labeling, criminal embeddedness, and subsequent delinquency: A longitudinal test of labeling theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 67–88. doi:10.1177/0022427805280068
5.
BlaskeD. M.BorduinC. M.HenggelerS. W.MannB. J. (1989). Individual, family, and peer characteristics of adolescent sex offenders and assaultive offenders. Developmental Psychology, 25, 846–855. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.846
6.
BorduinC. M.BlaskeD. M.ConeL.MannB. J. (1989). Development and validation of a measure of adolescent peer relations: The Missouri peer relations inventory(Unpublished manuscript). Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.
7.
BorduinC. M.MannB. J.ConeL. T.HenggelerS. W.FucciB. R.BlaskeD. M.WilliamsR. A. (1995). Multisystemic treatment of serious juvenile offenders: Long-term prevention of criminality and violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 569–578. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.63.4.569
8.
BrightC. L.Jonson-ReidM. (2010). Young adult outcomes of juvenile court-involved girls. Journal of Social Service Research, 36, 94–106. doi:10.1080/01488370903577993
9.
BronfenbrennerU.MorrisP. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In LernerR. M.DamonW. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
10.
BuehlerC.LangeG.FranckK. L. (2007). Adolescents’ cognitive and emotional responses to marital hostility. Child Development, 78, 775–789. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01032.x
11.
CauffmanE.LexcenF. J.GoldweberA.ShulmanE. P.GrissoT. (2007). Gender differences in mental health symptoms among delinquent and community youth. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5, 287–307. doi:10.1177/1541204007301292
12.
ChamberlainP. (2003). Treating chronic juvenile offenders: Advances made through the Oregon multidimensional treatment foster care model. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10596-000
13.
Chesney-LindM.BelknapJ. (2004). Trends in delinquent girls’ aggression and violent behavior: A review of the evidence. In PutallazM.BiermanP. (Eds.), Aggression, antisocial behavior and violence among girls: A developmental perspective (pp. 203–222). New York, NY: Guilford.
14.
Chesney-LindM.MorashM.StevensT. (2008). Girls’ troubles, girls’ delinquency, and gender responsive programming: A review. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41, 162–189. doi:10.1375/acri.41.1.162
15.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
ComreyA. L. (1988). Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 754–761. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.56.5.754
17.
CookN. E.BareseT. H.DiCataldoF. (2010). The confluence of mental health and psychopathic traits in adolescent female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 119–135. doi:10.1177/0093854809350607
18.
DavisM.FisherW. H.GershensonB.GrudzinskasA. J.BanksS. M. (2009). Justice system involvement into young adulthood: Comparison of adolescent girls in the public mental health system and in the general population. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 234–236. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.141135
19.
DerogatisL. R. (1993). Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
20.
DixonA.HowieP.StarlingJ. (2004). Psychopathology in female juvenile offenders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1150–1158. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00307.x
21.
DixonA.HowieP.StarlingJ. (2005). Trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress, and psychiatric comorbidity in female juvenile offenders. Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 798–806. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000164590.48318.9c
22.
DodgeK. A. (2003). Do social information-processing patterns mediate aggressive behavior? In LaheyB. B.MoffittT. E.CaspiA. (Eds.), Causes of conduct disorder and juvenile delinquency (pp. 254–274). New York, NY: Guilford.
23.
DodgeK. A.DishionT. J.LansfordJ. E. (2006). Deviant peer influences in intervention and public policy for youth. Social Policy Report, 20, 3–19. Retrieved fromhttp://www.srcd.org/spr.html
24.
EybergS. M.NelsonM. M.BoggsS. R. (2008). Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with disruptive behavior. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37, 215–237. doi:10.1080/15374410701820117
25.
Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice. (1995). Uniform crime reports. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved fromhttp://www.fbi.gov/ucr/ucr.htm
26.
Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice. (2010). Uniform crime reports. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved fromhttp://www.fbi.gov/ucr/ucr.htm
27.
FergussonD. M.WoodwardL. J. (2000). Educational, psychosocial, and sexual outcomes of girls with conduct problems in early adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 779–792. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00665
28.
GilbertR.KempA.ThoburnJ.SidebothamP.RadfordL.GlaserD.MacMillanH. L. (2009). Recognising and responding to child maltreatment. The Lancet, 373, 167–180. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61707-9
29.
GoldweberA.BroidyL. M.CauffmanE. (2009). Interdisciplinary perspectives on persistent female offending: A review of theory and research. In SavageJ. (Ed.), The development of persistent criminality (pp. 205–231). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
GriceJ. W. (2001). Computing and evaluating factor scores. Psychological Methods, 6, 430–450. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.430
31.
HandalP. J.GistD.GilnerF. H.SearightH. R. (1993). Preliminary validity for the Langner Symptom Survey and the Brief Symptom Inventory as mass-screening instruments for adolescent adjustment. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 22, 382–386. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp2203_9
32.
HenggelerS. W.SchoenwaldS. K.BorduinC. M.RowlandM. D.CunninghamP. B. (2009). Multisystemic therapy for antisocial behavior in children and adolescents (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
33.
HollingsheadA. B. (1975). The four-factor index of social status(Unpublished manuscript). Yale University, New Haven, CT.
34.
HubbardD. J.PrattT. C. (2002). A meta-analysis of the predictors of delinquency among girls. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 34, 1–13. doi:10.1300/J076v34n03_01
35.
HubertyC. J.MorrisJ. D. (1989). Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 302–308. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105
36.
HuizengaH. M.SmedingH.GrasmanR. P. P. P.SchmandB. (2007). Multivariate normative comparisons. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2534–2542. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.011
37.
JaccardJ.BlantonH.DodgeT. (2005). Peer influences on risk behavior: An analysis of the effects of a close friend. Developmental Psychology, 41, 135–147. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.1.135
38.
JaccardJ.Guilamo-RamosV. (2002). Analysis of variance frameworks in clinical child and adolescent psychology: Issues and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 130–146. doi:10.1207/153744202753441747
39.
JohanssonP.Kempf-LeonardK. (2009). A gender-specific pathway to serious, violent, and chronic offending?: Exploring Howell’s risk factors for serious delinquency. Crime Delinquency, 55, 216–240. doi:10.1177/0011128708330652
40.
Kempf-LeonardK.JohanssonP. (2007). Gender and runaways: Risk factors, delinquency, and juvenile justice experiences. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5, 308–327. doi:10.1177/1541204007301293
41.
KerigP. K.LindahlK. M. (Eds.). (2001). Family observational coding systems. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
LacourseE.NaginD.TremblayR. E.VitaroF.ClaesM. (2003). Developmental trajectories of boys’ delinquent group membership and facilitation of violent behaviors during adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 183–197. doi:10.1017/S0954579403000105
43.
LansfordJ. E.Miller-JohnsonS.BerlinL. J.DodgeK. A.BatesJ. E.PettitG. S. (2007). Early physical abuse and later violent delinquency: A prospective longitudinal study. Child Maltreatment, 12, 233–245. doi:10.1177/1077559507301841
44.
LilienfeldS. O. (2003). Comorbidity between and within childhood externalizing and internalizing disorders: Reflections and directions. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 285–291. doi:10.1023/A:1023229529866
45.
LipseyM. W.DerzonJ. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In LoeberR.FarringtonD. P. (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
LoeberR.FarringtonD. P. (Eds.). (1998). Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
MannB. J.BorduinC. M.HenggelerS. W.BlaskeD. M. (1990). An investigation of systemic conceptualizations of parent-child coalitions and symptom change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 336–344. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.58.3.336
48.
MasonW. A.HitchingsJ. E.McMahonR. J.SpothR. L. (2007). A test of three alternative hypotheses regarding the effects of early delinquency on adolescent psychosocial functioning and substance involvement. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 831–843. doi:10.1007/s10802-007-9130-7
49.
MatherneM. M.ThomasA. (2001). Family environment as a predictor of adolescent delinquency. Adolescence, 36, 655–664. Retrieved fromhttp://www.eric.ed.gov/
50.
McMahonR. J.FrickP. J. (2007). Conduct and oppositional disorders. In MashE. J.BarkleyR. A. (Eds.), Assessment of childhood disorders (4th ed., pp. 132–183). New York, NY: Guilford.
51.
MinuchinP. (2002). Looking toward the horizon: Present and future in the study of family systems. In McHaleJ. P.GrolnickW. S. (Eds.), Retrospect and prospect in the psychological study of families (pp. 259–278). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
MinuchinS.NicholsM. P. (1998). Structural family therapy. In DattilioF. M. (Ed.), Case studies in couple and family therapy: Systemic and cognitive perspectives (pp. 108–131). New York, NY: Guilford.
53.
National Institutes of Health. (2006). National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science consensus statement. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 457–470. doi:10.1007/s10802-006-9043-x
54.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice. (2010). Girls study group: Causes and correlates of girls’ delinquency. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/226358.pdf
55.
OlsonD. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 144–167. doi:10.1111/1467–6427.00144
56.
OlsonD. H.PortnerJ.BellR. (1982). Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales. In OlsonD. H.McCubbinH. I.BarnesH. L.LarsonA.MuxenM.WilsonM. (Eds.), Family inventories (pp. 5–24). St.Paul: Department of Family Social Science, University of Minnesota.
57.
PatilV. H.McPhersonM. Q.FriesnerD. (2010). The use of exploratory factor analysis in public health: A note on parallel analysis as a factor retention criterion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 24, 178–181. doi:10.4278/ajhp.08033131
58.
PayneA. A. (2009). Girls, boys, and schools: Gender differences in the relationships between school-related factors and student deviance. Criminology, 47, 1167–1200. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00172.x
59.
PiqueroA. R.BrameR.MoffittT. E. (2005). Extending the study of continuity and change: Gender differences in the linkage between adolescent and adult offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 219–243. doi:10.1007/s10940-005-2494-3
60.
QuayH. C.PetersonD. R. (1987). Manual for the revised behavior problem checklist. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami.
61.
RodickJ. D.HenggelerS. W.HansonC. L. (1986). An evaluation of the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales and the circumplex model. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 14, 77–87. doi:10.1007/BF00917223
62.
RonisS. T.BorduinC. M. (2007). Individual, family, peer, and academic characteristics of juvenile sexual offenders. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 153–163. doi:10.1007/s10802-006-9058-3
63.
SchaefferC. M.BorduinC. M. (2005). Long-term follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of multisystemic therapy with serious and violent juvenile offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 445–453. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.445
64.
SnyderJ.ReidJ.PattersonG. (2003). A social learning model of child and adolescent antisocial behavior. In LaheyB. B.MoffittT. E.CaspiA. (Eds.), Causes of conduct disorder and juvenile delinquency (pp. 27–48). New York, NY: Guilford.
65.
SprottJ. B.DoobA. N. (2009). Justice for girls?Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
66.
Stouthamer-LoeberM.LoeberR. (2002). Lost opportunities for intervention: Undetected markers for the development of serious juvenile delinquency. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 12, 69–82. doi:10.1002/cbm.487
67.
WindleM.MasonW. A. (2004). General and specific predictors of behavioral and emotional problems among adolescents. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 49–61. doi:10.1177/10634266040120010601
68.
WongT. M. L.SlotboomA.-MBijleveldC. C. J. H. (2010). Risk factors for delinquency in adolescent and young adult females: A European review. European Journal of Criminology, 7, 266–284. doi:10.1177/1477370810363374
69.
ZahnM. A. (Ed.). (2009). The delinquent girl. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
70.
ZahnM. A.DayJ. C.MihalicS. F.TichavskyL. (2009). Determining what works for girls in the juvenile justice system: A summary of evaluation evidence. Crime and Delinquency, 55, 266–293. doi:10.1177/0011128708330649
