Analysis of predictive validity of the risk/needs assessment used by a criminal justice agency is paramount. The validity of the Positive Achievement Change Tool (PACT) across gender/race/ethnicity in a juvenile sample was examined. Results demonstrate recidivism increases as PACT score increases, with minor exceptions. Findings suggest similar prediction of referral/arrest and adjudication/conviction across subgroups. 95% confidence intervals overlapped for all subgroups on 13 of 19 measures examined. However, which factors predict recidivism across subgroups differ. Criminal history was the most prevalent predictor, while no factor predicted White female offending. “Gender-responsive” item inclusion measuring abusive/traumatic circumstances did not improve prediction.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3 rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithJ. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 7–27.
3.
Andrews. (2011). Are the major risk/need factors predictive of both female and male reoffending? A test with the eight domains of the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 113–133.
4.
AndrewsD. A.RobinsonD. (1984). The level of supervision inventory: Second report (report to Research Services). Toronto, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services.
5.
AuerhahnK. (1999). Selective incapacitation and the problem of prediction. Criminology, 37, 703–735.
6.
AuerhahnK. (2006). Conceptual and methodological issues in the prediction of dangerous behavior. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 771–778.
7.
BaglivioM. T. (2009). The assessment of risk to recidivate among a juvenile offending population. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 596–607.
8.
BarnoskiR. (1997). Standards for improving research effectiveness in adult and juvenile justice. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
9.
BarnoskiR. (2004). Assessing risk for re-offense: Validating the Washington state juvenile court assessment. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
10.
BlackmoreJ.WelshJ. (1983). Selective incapacitation: Sentencing according to risk. Crime and Delinquency, 29, 504–529.
11.
BontaJ. (2002). Offender risk assessment: Guidelines for selection and use. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 355–379.
12.
BontaJ.LawM.HansonK. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 123–142.
13.
ChaikenJ. M.ChaikenM. R. (1982). Varieties of criminal behavior. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
14.
CohenJ. (1983). Incapacitation as a strategy for crime control: Possibilities and pitfalls. In TonryM.MorrisN. (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (pp. 1–84). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
CottleC. C.LeeR. L.HeilbrunK. (2001). The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 28, 367–394.
16.
DawesR. M.FaustD.MeehlP. E. (1993). Statistical prediction versus clinical prediction: Improving what works. In KarenG.LewisC. (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences (pp. 351–367). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
FarringtonD. P. (1986). Age and crime. In TonryM.MorrisN. (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 7, pp. 189–250). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
FassT.HeilbrunK.DeMatteoD.FretzR. (2008). The LSI-R and the compass: Validation data on two risk-needs tools. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1095–1108.
19.
Florida Department of Juvenile Justice. (n.d.). The Positive Achievement Change Tool (PACT) profile. Retrieved June 9, 2007 from the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice Web site: http://www.djj.state.fl.us/probation/pact.html
20.
GavazziS. M.YarcheckC. M.LimJ. (2006). Ethnicity, gender, and global risk indicators in the lives of status offenders coming to the attention of the juvenile court. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 696–710.
21.
GendreauP.GogginC.SmithP. (2002). Is the PCL-R really the “unparalleled” measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 397–426.
22.
GendreauP.LittleT.GogginC. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34, 401–433.
23.
GottfredsonM. R.GottfredsonD. M. (1988). Decision making in criminal justice: Toward a rational exercise of discretion. New York, NY: Plenum.
24.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
GottfredsonS. D.MoriartyL. J. (2006). Statistical risk assessment: Old problems and new applications. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 178–200.
26.
GreenwoodP. W.AbrahamseA. (1982). Selective incapacitation. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
27.
GroveW. M.MeehlP. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293–323.
28.
GroveW. M.ZaldD. H.LebowB. S.SnitzB. E.NelsonC. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychology Assessment, 12, 19–30.
29.
Hannah-MoffatK. (2009). Gridlock or mutability: Reconsidering “gender” and risk assessment. Criminology and Public Policy, 8, 209–219.
30.
HansonR. K.BussiereM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362.
31.
HogeR. D. (2001). The juvenile offender: Theory, research, and application. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
32.
HogeR. D. (2002). Standardized instruments for assessing risk and need in youthful offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 380–396.
33.
HoltfreterK.ReisigM.MorashM. (2004). Poverty, state capital, and recidivism among women offenders. Criminology and Public Policy, 3, 185–208.
34.
MoffittT. E. (1993). Adolescent-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.
35.
MonahanJ. (1981). Predicting violent behavior: An assessment of clinical techniques. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
36.
MorashM.Chesney-LindM. (1991). A reformulation and partial test of the power control theory of delinquency. Justice Quarterly, 8, 347–377.
37.
MossmanD. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 783–792.
38.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.WormithJ. S. (2009). Risk assessment with young offenders: A meta-analysis of three assessment measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 329–353.
PalmerE. J.HollinC. R. (2007). The level of service inventory-revised with english women prisoners: A needs and reconviction analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 971–984.
41.
ReisigM. D.HoltfreterK.MorashM. (2006). Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime. Justice Quarterly, 23, 384–405.
42.
ResnickM. S.IrelandM.BorowskyI. (2004). Youth violence perpetration: What protects? What predicts? Findings from the national longitudinal study on adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 424e1–424e10.
43.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615–620.
44.
SalisburyE. J.Van VoorhisP.SpiropoulosG. V. (2009). The predictive validity of a gender-responsive needs assessment: An exploratory study. Crime and Delinquency, 55, 550–585.
45.
SchwalbeC. S. (2007). Risk assessment for juvenile justice: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 449–462.
46.
SchwalbeC. S. (2008). A meta-analysis of juvenile justice risk assessment instruments: Predictive validity by gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1367–1381.
47.
SchwalbeC. S.FraserM. W.DayS. H. (2007). Predictive validity of the joint risk matrix with juvenile offenders: A focus on gender and race/ethnicity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 348–361.
48.
SchwalbeC. S.FraserM. W.DayS. H.CooleyV. (2006). Classifying juvenile offenders according to risk or recidivism: Predictive validity, race/ethnicity, and gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 305–324.
49.
SmithP.CullenF. T.LatessaE. J. (2009). Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta-analysis of the LSI-R and recidivism for female offenders. Criminology and Public Policy, 8, 183–208.
50.
von HirschA.GottfredsonD. M. (1984). Selective incapacitation: Some queries on research design and equity. Review of Law and Social Change, 12, 11–51.
51.
Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2004). Assessing risk for re-offense: Validating the Washington State Juvenile Court assessment. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
