The relationships between race and probation violations with preadjudication secure detention decision and detention hearings are examined in three jurisdictions in a Midwestern state that use a detention screening instrument. Interpretations of consensus theory and the racial or symbolic threat thesis with an emphasis on race stereotyping serve as the theoretical background for the study. The results reveal race to be influential in detention decisions in one jurisdiction, while involvement in probation violations is associated with the initial detention decision in all three jurisdictions. Implications for future research and for assessing whether the structuring of detention decision-making results in greater equality in detention proceedings for minority youth relative to White youth are discussed.
AnnieE. Casey Foundation. (2009). Progress report, two decades of JDAI: From demonstration project to national standard. Baltimore, Maryland: EAnnie. Casey Foundation.
2.
ArmstrongG.RodriguezN. (2005). Effects of individual and contextual characteristics on preadjudication detention of juvenile delinquents. Justice Quarterly, 22, 521–539.
3.
AustinJ.JohnsonK. D.WeitzerR. (2005). Alternatives to the secure detention and confinement of juvenile offenders. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
4.
BerkR. A. (1983). An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48, 386–398.
5.
BishopD. (2005). The role of race and ethnicity in juvenile justice processing. In HawkinsD.Kempf-LeonardK. (Eds.), Our children, their children: Confronting racial and ethnic differences in American juvenile justice (pp. 23–82). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6.
BishopD.FrazierC. (1996). Race effects in juvenile justice decision-making: Findings of a statewide analysis. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 392–413.
7.
BishopD.LeiberM. (2011). Race, ethnicity, and juvenile justice: Racial and ethnic differences in delinquency and justice system responses. In FeldB.BishopD. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of juvenile crime and juvenile justice (pp. 445–484). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
BishopD.LeiberM.JohnsonJ. (2010). Contexts of decision making in the juvenile justice system: An organizational approach to understanding minority overrepresentation. Journal of Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 8, 213–233.
9.
BlalockH. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
10.
BridgesG. S.ConleyD. J.EngenR. L.Price-SpratlenT. (1995). Racial disparities in the confinement of juveniles: Effects of crime and community social structure on punishment. In Kempf LeonardK.PopeC. E.FeyerhermW. H. (Eds.), Minorities in juvenile justice (pp. 128–152). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
BridgesG. S.SteenS. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63, 554–570.
12.
Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice. (2009). Reforming the juvenile justice system. Retrieved from H:\artciles\dmc book\CJCJ.
13.
DurkheimE. (1964). The division of labour in society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
14.
EngenR.SteenS.BridgesG. (2002). Racial disparities in the punishment of youth: A theoretical and empirical assessment of the literature. Social Problems, 49, 194–220.
15.
FaganJ. (2010). The contradictions of juvenile crime and punishment. Dædalus (Summer), 139, 43–61.
16.
FeldB. C. (1999). Bad kids: Race and the transformation of the juvenile court. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17.
FeyerhermW. (2000). Detention reform and over-representation: A successful synergy. Corrections Management Quarterly, 4, 44–51.
18.
FeyerhermW. (2007). An analysis of detention decision-making in three Iowa counties. Portland, OR: Portland State University.
19.
FialkoffD. (2009). Standardizing parole violation sanction. NIJ Journal, 263,18–22.
20.
FrazierC. E.BishopD. (1995). Reflections on race effects in juvenile justice. In Kempf-LeonardK.PopeC.FeyerhermW. (Eds.), Minorities in juvenile justice (pp. 16–26). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
FrazierC. E.CochranJ. C. (1986). Detention of juveniles: Its effects on subsequent juvenile court processing decisions. Youth and Society, 17, 286–305.
22.
FreiburgerT. L.JordanK. L. (2011). A multilevel analysis of race on the decision to petition a case in the juvenile court. Race & Justice, 1, 185–201.
23.
GiesG.CohenF.VillaruelF. (2009). Intervention. In Disproportionate Minority Contact Technical Assistance Manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
24.
GlazeL.BonczarT. (2007, December). Probation and parole in the United States, 2006. Bureau of justice statistics bulletin NCJ 220218. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
25.
GrahamS.LoweryB. (2004). Priming unconscious racial stereotypes about adolescent offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 483–504.
26.
GrattetR.PetersiliaJ.LinJ. (2008). Parole violations and revocations in California, final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
27.
GuevaraL.HerzD.SpohnC. (2006). Gender and juvenile justice decision making: What role does race play?Feminist Criminology, 1, 258–282.
28.
HarrisA. (2007). Diverting and abdicating judicial discretion: Cultural, political, and procedural dynamics in California juvenile justice. Law and Society Review, 41, 387–428.
29.
HarrisR.HuenkeC.Rodriguez-LabarcaJ.O’ConnellJ. (1998). Disproportionate representation of minority juveniles at arrest: An examination of 1994 charging patterns by race. Dover: Delaware Statistical Analysis Center.
HolmanB.ZiedenbergJ. (2006). The dangers of detention: The impact of incarcerating youth in detention and other secure facilities. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute.
32.
Justice Policy Institute. (2002). Reducing disproportionate minority confinement: The Multnomah County, Oregon success story and implications. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute.
33.
Kempf-LeonardK.SontheimerH. (1995). The role of race in juvenile justice in pennsylvania. In HawkinsD. F.Kempf-LeonardK. (Eds.), Our children, their children: Confronting racial and ethnic differences in American juvenile justice (pp. 98–127). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Kids Count. (2010, October). Rethinking the juvenile delinquent in Ohio(Issue Brief). Columbus, Ohio: Children’s Defense Fund.
35.
LaubJ.SampsonR. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
LeiberM. (1994). A comparison of juvenile court outcomes for Native Americans, African Americans, and Whites. Justice Quarterly, 11, 257–279.
37.
LeiberM. (2002). Disproportionate minority confinement (DMC) of youth: An analysis of state and federal efforts to address the issue. Crime & Delinquency, 48, 3–45.
38.
LeiberM. (2003). The contexts of juvenile justice decision making: When race matters. Albany: State University of New York Press.
39.
LeiberM. (Forthcoming). Race, pre- and post-detention, and juvenile justice decision making.”Crime and Delinquency. doi:10.1177/0011128709345970.
40.
LeiberM.BishopD.ChamlinM. (2011). Juvenile justice decision-making before and after the implementation of the disproportionate minority contact (DMC) mandate. Justice Quarterly, 28, 460–492.
41.
LeiberM.FoxK. (2005). Race and the impact of detention on juvenile justice decision making. Crime & Delinquency, 51, 470–497.
42.
LeiberM.JohnsonJ. (2008). Being young and Black: What are their effects on juvenile justice decision making?Crime & Delinquency, 54, 560–581.
43.
LeiberM.MackK. (2003). The individual and joint effects of race, gender, and family status on juvenile justice decision-making. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 34–70.
44.
LeiberM.RodriguezN. (2011). The implementation of the disproportionate minority confinement/contact (DMC) mandate: A failure or success?Journal of Race and Justice, 1, 103–124.
45.
MalletC. (2010). Predicting secure detention placement for African-American juvenile offenders: Addressing the disproportionate minority confinement problem. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 8, 91–103.
46.
MalletC.Stoddard-DareP. (2010). Predicting secure detention placement for African-American juvenile offenders: Addressing the disproportionate minority confinement problem. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 8, 91–103.
47.
MendelR. A. (2009). Two decades of JDAI: From demonstration project to national standard. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
48.
MulveyE. P.IselinA. R. (2008). Improving professional judgments of risk and amenability in juvenile justice. Future of Children, 18, 35–57.
49.
National Resource Center for Family Centered Practiced. (2010). Facts and Figures. University of Iowa-School of Social Work. Retrieved from http://www.uiowa.edu*nrcfcp/dmcrc/facts_and_figures.shtml.
50.
NellisA. (2005). Seven steps to develop and evaluate strategies to reduce disproportionate minority contact (DMC). Washington, DC: Juvenile Justice Evaluation Center.
51.
NellisA.RichardsonB. (2010). Getting beyond failure: Promising approaches for reducing DMC. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8, 266–276.
52.
PopeC. E.FeyerhermW. (1993). Minorities and the juvenile justice system. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
53.
PopeC.LeiberM. (2005). Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC): The federal initiative. In HawkinsD. F.Kempf-LeonardK. (Eds.), Our children, their children: Confronting racial and ethnic differences in American juvenile justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54.
PopeC. E.LovellR.HsiaH. (2002). Disproportionate minority confinement: A review of the research literature from 1989 to 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
55.
PopeC. E.LovellR.StojkovicS.RoseH. (1996). Minority overrepresentation: Phase II study final report. Milwaukee: Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance, Governor’s Commission on Juvenile Justice.
56.
PuzzancheraC.AdamsB. (2010). National disproportionate minority contact databook. Washington, DC: National Center for Juvenile Justice for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
57.
RodriguezN. (2007). Juvenile court context and detention decisions: Reconsidering the role of race, ethnicity, and community characteristics in juvenile court processes. Justice Quarterly, 24, 629–656.
58.
RodriguezN. (2010). The cumulative effect of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes and why preadjudication detention matters. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 47, 391–413.
59.
RodriguezN.SmithH.ZatzM. (2009). Youth is enmeshed in a highly dysfunctional family system: Exploring the relationship among dysfunctional families, parental incarceration, and juvenile court decision making. Criminology, 47, 177–207.
60.
RosayA.EverettR. (2006). Quantitative analysis of disparities in juvenile delinquency referrals. Anchorage: Justice Center, University of Alaska.
61.
SabolW.CourtureH. (2008, June 5). Prison inmates at Midyear 2007. Bureau of justice statistics bulletin NCJ 221944. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
62.
SampsonR.LaubJ. (1993). Structural variations in juvenile court processing: Inequality, the underclass, and social control. Law and Society Review, 27, 285–311.
63.
SecretP.JohnsonJ. (1997). The effect of race on juvenile justice decision making in Nebraska: Detention, adjudication, and disposition, 1988–1993. Justice Quarterly, 14, 445–478.
64.
ShookJ.GoodkindS. (2009). Racial disproportionality in juvenile justice: The interaction of race and geography in pretrial detention for violent and serious offenses. Journal of Race & Social Problems, 1, 257–266.
65.
SnyderH. (1990). Growth in minority detentions attributed to drug law violators. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
66.
SolerM.GarryL. (2009). Reducing disproportionate contact: Preparation at the local level. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
67.
SteenS.BondC.BridgesG. S.KubrinC. E. (2005). Explaining assessments of future risk: Race and attributions of juvenile offenders in presentencing reports. In HawkinsD. F.Kempf-LeonardK. (Eds.), Our children, their children: Confronting racial and ethnic differences in American juvenile justice (pp. 245–269). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
68.
SteenS.EngenR.GaineyR. (2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 435–468.
69.
SteinhartD. (2001). Special detention cases: Strategies for handling difficult populations pathways to juvenile detention reform. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Case Foundation.
70.
The Sentencing Project. (2008). Reducing racial disparity in the criminal justice system a manual for practitioners and policymakers. Washington, DC.
71.
TittleC. R.CurranD. (1988). Contingencies for dispositional disparities in juvenile justice. Social Forces, 67, 23–48.
72.
TracyP. (2005). Race, ethnicity, and juvenile justice. In HawkinsD. F.Kempf- LeonardK. (Eds.), Our children, their children: Confronting racial and ethnic differences in American juvenile justice (pp. 245–269). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
73.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2009). The disproportionate minority contact technical assistance manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
74.
WesternB. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
75.
Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. (2008). Commission on reducing racial disparities in the Wisconsin justice system final report. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance, Madison, Wisconsin.
