In recent years, zero-tolerance policies have been implemented in an attempt to reduce violent and/or drug-related activities in schools. These policies are sometimes expanded to include less serious crimes, which raises a number of questions regarding juvenile justice (JJ) system response and processing. This article discusses the need, implementation, and some preliminary program outcomes related to a civil citation (CC) process undertaken to provide an alternative to school-based justice referrals. Aggregate trends were reviewed based on internal program data as well as publicly available information. Follow-up data on CC youth were obtained and a matched sample of youth not engaged in the CC process was created using a state-level administrative data set to provide a preliminary assessment of outcomes. Key informant interviews examined program development and implementation. Results of this preliminary evaluation are considered in the larger context of youth diversion and school-based practices for dealing with youth misconduct.
Advancement Project/Civil Rights Project. (2000). Opportunities suspended: The devastating consequences of zero tolerance and school discipline policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
Advancement Project. (2005). Education on lockdown: The schoolhouse to jailhouse track. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Aos, S., Phipps, P., Barnoski, R., & Lieb, R. ( 2001). The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime, version 4.0. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
4.
Beck, V.S., Ramsey, R.J., Lipps, T.R., & Travis, L.F. ( 2006). Juvenile diversion: An outcome study of the Hamilton County, Ohio unofficial juvenile community courts. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 57, 1-7.
5.
Brame, R., Paternoster, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. ( 1998). Testing for the equality of maximum-likelihood regression coefficients between two independent equations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 245-261.
6.
Chen, G. ( 2008). Communities, students, schools, and school crime: A confirmatory study of crime in U.S. high schools. Urban Education, 43, 301-318.
7.
Clogg, C., Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. ( 1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1261-1293.
8.
Cocozza, J.J., Veysey, B.M., Chapin, D.A., Dembo, R., Walters, W., & Farina, S. ( 2005). Diversion from the juvenile justice system: The Miami-Dade Juvenile Assessment Center post-arrest diversion program. Substance Use & Misuse, 40, 935-951.
9.
Fenning, P., & Rose, J. ( 2007). Overrepresentation of African American students in exclusionary discipline: The role of school policy. Urban Education, 42, 536-559.
10.
Florida Department of Juvenile Justice(2006). 2006 outcome evaluation report. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Juvenile Justice.
11.
Foster, E.M., Qaseem, A., & Connor, T. ( 2004). Can better mental health services reduce the risk of juvenile justice system involvement? American Journal of Public Health, 94, 859-865.
12.
Henggeler, S.W. ( 1997). Treating serious anti-social behavior in youth: The MST approach. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
13.
Hirschfield, P.J. ( 2008). Preparing for prison? The criminalization of school discipline in the USA. Theoretical Criminology, 12, 79-101.
14.
Latimer, J. ( 2001). A meta-analytic examination of youth delinquency, family treatment, and recidivism. Canadian Journal of Criminology , 43, 237-253.
15.
Lawrence, R. ( 2007). School crime and juvenile justice (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Lemert, E.M. ( 1972). Human deviance, social problems, and social control (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
Lipsey, M.W., Wilson, D.B., & Cothern, L. ( 2000). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders . Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
18.
Morrison, G.M., & Skiba, R. ( 2001). Predicting violence from school misbehavior: Promises and perils. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 173-184.
19.
Myers, W.C., Burton, P.R.S., Sanders, P.D., Donat, K.M., Cheney, J., & Fitzpatrick, T.M. , et al. (2000). Project Back-on-Track at 1 year: A delinquency treatment program for early-career juvenile offenders . Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 1127-1134.
20.
Naacp (2006). Arresting development: Addressing the school discipline crisis in Florida . Orlando, FL. Florida State Conference NAACP, The Advancement Project, and The NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc.: Author.
21.
Noguera, P.A. ( 2003). Schools, prisons, and social implications of punishment: Rethinking disciplinary practices. Theory into Practice, 42, 341-350.
22.
Office of Research and Planning(2006). School related referrals: Fiscal year 2004-05. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Juvenile Justice.
23.
Office of Research and Planning(2008). 2007-2008 profile of delinquency cases and youths referred. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Juvenile Justice.
24.
Office of Research and Planning. (2009). Delinquency in Florida schools-A four year study - FY 2004-2005 through 2007-2008. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Juvenile Justice.
25.
Patrick, S., & Marsh, R. ( 2005). Juvenile diversion: Results of a 3-year experimental study. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, 59-73.
26.
Potter, R.H., & Kakar, S. ( 2002). The diversion decision-making process from the juvenile court practitioner’s perspective. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 18, 20-36.
27.
Regoli, R., Wilderman, E., & Pogrebin, M. ( 1985). Using an alternative evaluation measure for assessing juvenile diversion programs. Children and Youth Services Review , 7, 21-38.
28.
Reyes, A.H. ( 2006). Discipline, achievement & race: Is zero tolerance the answer?Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
29.
Scott, E.S., & Steinberg, L. ( 2008). Rethinking juvenile justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Sexton, A., & Alexander, J.F. (2000). Functional family therapy . Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
31.
Shadish, W., Cook, T., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
32.
Shelden, R.G. ( 1999). Detention diversion advocacy: An evaluation. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
33.
Skiba, R.J., & Knesting, K. ( 2001). Zero tolerance, zero evidence: An analysis of school disciplinary practice. In R. J. Skiba & G. G. Noam (Eds.), Zero tolerance: Can suspension and expulsion keep schools safe? (pp. 17-43). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
Skiba, R.J., Michael, R.S., Nardo, A.C., & Peterson, R.L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34, 317-342.
35.
Skiba, R., Rausch, M.K., & Ritter, S. ( 2004). Discipline is always teaching: Effective alternatives to zero tolerance in Indiana’s schools. Education Policy Briefs, Vol. 2. Bloomington: Indiana Youth Services Association, Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.
36.
Stader, D.L. ( 2006). Zero tolerance: Safe schools or zero sense? Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 6, 65-75.
37.
Sughrue, J.A. ( 2003). Zero tolerance for children: Two wrongs do not make a right. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 238-258.
38.
Sullivan, C.J., Veysey, B.M., Hamilton, Z.K., & Grillo, M. ( 2007). Reducing out-of-community placement and recidivism: Diversion of youth with mental health and substance abuse disorders from the justice system. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 555-577.
39.
Walker, J.S. ( 2008). How and why does wraparound work: A theory of change. OR: National Wraparound Initiative, Portland State University .
