This article describes the development and validation of a scale designed to measure positive peer influence. Participants from six teen court sites completed an anonymous survey (N = 202), which included the newly developed Teen Court Peer Influence Scale (TCPIS). A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test three measurement models to determine the best fit to the data. The final measurement model included three reciprocal factors: positive cognitions, positive identity development, and modeling positive behaviors. The model illustrated strong psychometric properties and provides a framework that may be used to augment practice.
Akers, R.L., & Lee, G. ( 1996). A longitudinal test of social learning theory: Adolescent smoking. Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 317-343.
2.
Akers, R.L., & Lee, G. ( 1999). Age, social learning, and social bonding in adolescent substance use. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal , 19, 1-25.
3.
Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J.G. ( 1999). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
Butts, J.A. ( 2002). Findings from the OJJDP evaluation of teen courts to be released at national youth court conference. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency.
5.
Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. ( 1999). Initial impact of the fast track prevention trial for conduct problems. The high-risk sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 1-15.
6.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. ( 1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
7.
Deptula, D.P., & Cohen, R. ( 2004). Aggressive, rejected, and delinquent children and adolescents: A comparison of their friendships. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 75-104.
8.
DeVellis, R.F. ( 2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Dick, A.J., Pence, D.J., Jones, R.M., & Geersten, H.R. (2004). The need for theory in assessing peer courts. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 1448-1461.
10.
Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (FDJJ). (2006). Evidence-based treatments. Retrieved January 29, 2006, from http://www.djj.state.fl.us/whatworks/Evidence-Based.html
11.
Garrison, D.C. ( 2006). Validity. Retrieved September 18, 2006, from http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/ PA765/validity.htm
12.
Haynie, D.L., & Osgood, D.W. ( 2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter ? Social Forces, 84, 1109-1130.
13.
Henson, R.K., & Roberts, J.K. ( 2000). Exploratory factor analysis reporting practices in published research. In B Thompson (ed.), . Advances in social sciences methodology (Vol. 6). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
14.
Heppner, H.P., & Heppner, M.J. ( 2004). Conducting quantitative analyses and presenting your results. In Writing and publishing your thesis, dissertation, and research: A guide for students in the helping professions (pp. 231-304). Belmont, CA: Brooks Cole.
15.
Higgins, G.E., & Makin, D.A. ( 2006). Digital piracy: Assessing the contributions of an integrated self-control theory and social learning theory using structural equation modeling . Criminal Justice Studies, 19, 3-22.
16.
Hirschi, T. ( 2005). Causes of delinquency (4th ed.). New Brunswick, NY: Transaction Publishers .
17.
Joreskog, K.G. ( 1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage.
18.
Kieffer, K.M. ( 1999). An introductory primer on the appropriate use of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Research in the Schools , 6, 75-92.
19.
Kline, R.B. ( 2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
20.
Krohn, M.D., Skinner, W.F., Massey, J.L., & Akers, R.L. ( 1985). Social learning theory and adolescent cigarette smoking: A longitudinal study. Social Problems, 32, 455-473.
21.
MacCallum, R.C., & Austin, J.T. ( 2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201-226.
22.
Maxwell, K.A. ( 2002). Friends: The role of peer influence across adolescent risk behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 267-277.
23.
Messek, S. ( 1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
24.
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Osgood, D.W., & Briddell, L. ( 2004). Peer effects in Juvenile Justice. Final Report of the Executive Sessions on Deviant Peer Contagion. Retrieved January 28, 2006, from http://www.pubpol.duke.edu/centers/child/DeviantPeer/osgood_draft_2.doc
26.
Pedhazur, E.J., & Schmelkin, L.P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Scales, P.C. ( 1999). Reducing risks and building assets: Essential actions for promoting adolescent health. Journal of School Health , 69(3), 113-119.
28.
Sellers, C.S., Cochran, J.K., & Branch, K.A. ( 2005). Social learning theory and partner violence: A research note. Deviant Behavior, 26, 379-395.
29.
Smith, K. S., & Chonody, J. (in press). Peer-driven justice: The development and validation of the teen court peer influence. Research on Social Work Practice.
30.
Springer, D., Abell, N., & Nugent, W.R. ( 2002). Creating and validating rapid assessment instruments for practice and research: Part 2. Research on Social Work Practice, 12, 768-795.
31.
Swadi, H., & Zeitlin, H. ( 1988). Peer influence and adolescent substance abuse: A promising side? Journal of Addiction, 83, 153-157.
32.
Thompson, B. ( 2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33.
Warr, M. ( 2002). Companions in crime. New York, NY : Cambridge University Press.
34.
Williamson County. ( 2006). Teen court. Retrieved January 28, 2006, from http://www.williamsoncounty-tn.gov/williamson/live/info.asp?page_s=3697
