This article examines young people's talk of violence to highlight the meanings of violence. Violence is approached as a fluid concept with multiple meanings. The empirical data consist of 15 focus group interviews of young people (38 young people between 12 and 17 years of age) in two Finnish reform schools carried out by two interviewers in each session. The interviews looked at the young residents' views on violence in general and on the reform schools in particular. The analysis focuses on the narrative means that the young people employed to describe violence: violence either as an instrumental means or as a form of expression. The collective nature of violence was emphasized. The results suggest that it is important to identify the multiple meanings assigned to violence for the needs of social and criminal policy and of research.
Anderson, S., Kinsey, R., Loader, I., & Smith, C. (1994). Cautionary tales. Young people, crime and policing in Edinburgh. Sydney: Aldershot.
2.
Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression. Its causes, consequences and control. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., & Robson, K. (2001). Focus groups in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Burman, M., Batchelor, S., & Brown, J. (2001). Researching girls and violence. Facing dilemmas of fieldwork. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 443-459.
5.
Campbell, A. (1993). Out of control. Men, women and aggression. London: Pandora.
6.
de Haan, W., & Vos, J. (2003). A crying shame: The over-rationalized conception of men in the rational choice perspective. Theoretical Criminology, 7, 29-54.
7.
Eskonen, I. (2005). Violence in children's narration. The International Journal of Child and Family Welfare8, 32-45.
8.
Felson, R. (2002). Violence and gender re-examined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Furlong, A., & Cartmel, F. (1997). Young people and social change. Individualization and risk in late modernity. Buckingham, U: Open University Press
11.
Goffman, E. (1987). Asylums. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
12.
Goldson, B. (2001). The demonization of children: From the symbolic to the institutional. In P. Foley, J. Roche, & S. Tucker (Eds.),Children in society. Contemporary theory, policy and practice (pp. 120-135). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
13.
Haraway, D. (1991). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In D. Haraway & S. Cyborgs (Eds.),Women. the reinvention of nature(pp. 183-250). London: Free Association.
14.
Hearn, J. (1998). The violences of men. London: Sage.
15.
Helasvuo, K. (1954). Laitospoikien keskinäisestä väkivaltaisuudesta [On violence among institutional boys]. Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylän kasvatusopillisen korkeakoulun julkaisuja IX.
16.
Honkatukia, P., Nyqvist, L., & Pösö, T. (2003). Sensitive issues in vulnerable conditions. Studying violence in youth residential care. Young,11, 323-339.
17.
Honkatukia, P., Nyqvist, L., & Pösö, T. (2005). Violence as a product of focus groups in a residential setting. Unpublished manuscript.
18.
Järventie, I., & Sauli, H. (2001). Eriarvoinen lapsuus [Unequal childhood]. Helsinki, Finland: WSOY.
19.
Karlsson, J. (2003). Ungdomars föreställningar om pojkar och flickor som utsätts för våld [Young people's conceptions on boys and girls as victims of violence]. In J. Karlsson & T. Pettersson (Eds.),Fokusgruppsintervjuer med ungdomar om genus och våld. Konstruktioner av gärningspersoner och offer (pp. 36-57). Stockholm: Stockholms Universitet.
20.
Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime. Moral and sensual attractions in doing evil. New York: Basic Books.
21.
Kitzinger, J. (1994). Focus groups: Method or madness? In M. Boulton (Ed.),Challenge and innovation. Methodological advances in social research on HIV/AIDS (pp. 159-175). London: Taylor & Francis.
22.
Krug, E., Dahlberg, L., Mercy, J., Zwi, A., & Lozano, R. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
23.
Kuure, T. (2001). Muistio nuorisoväkivallasta. Nuorisotyö ja polarisaatio-oletus [Memorandum on youth violence. Youth work and the assumption of polarization]. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from http://www.minedu.fi/nuora.julkaisut/vakivalta.html
24.
Kvale, S. (1996). An introduction to qualitative research interviewing.London: Sage.
25.
LaFree, G., & Drass, K. (2001). Homicide trends in Finland and 33 other nations since 1955: Is Finland still exceptional? In T. Lappi-Seppälä (Ed.),Homicide in Finland. Trends and patterns in historical and comparative perspective (Publication no. 181, pp. 5-18). Helsinki, Finland: National Research Institute of Legal Policy.
26.
Lahti, M. (2001). Domesticated violence. The power of ordinary in everyday Finland. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki University Press.
27.
Lehti, M. (2002). Henkirikokset 1998-2000. Tutkimus poliisin tietoon vuosina 1998-2000 tulleista henkirikoksista [Homicides 1998–2000. A study on homicides reported to the police in 1998– 2000]. Helsinki, Finland: Oikeuspoliittinen tutkimuslaitos & Tilastokeskus.
28.
Lehtonen, J. (2003). Seksuaalisuus ja sukupuoli koulussa [Sexuality and gender at school]. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki University Press and Nuorisotutkimusverkosto.
29.
Lieberg, M. (1993). Ungdomarna, staden och det offentliga rummet [Young people, the city and the public space]. In J. Fornäs, U. Boethius, & B. Reimer (Eds.), Ungdomar i skilda sfärer(pp. 187-234). Stockholm: Brutus Östlings bokförlag.
30.
Marttunen, M., & Kivivuori, J. (2003). Nuorisorikollisuus[Juvenile crime]. In Rikollisuustilanne 2002.Rikollisuus tilastojen valossa (pp. 143-157). Helsinki, Finland: Oikeuspoliittinen Tutkimuslaitos.
31.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
32.
Møller, M. (2000). I fars vold [In the father's power]. Oslo, Norway: Kommuneforlaget.
33.
Morgan, D. (2002). Focus group interviewing. In J. Gubrium & J. Holstein (Eds.),Handbook of interview research. Context & method (pp. 141-159). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Muncie, J. (2004). Youth and crime. A critical introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Nyqvist, L. (2001). Väkivaltainen parisuhde, asiakkuus ja muutos. Prosessinarviointi parisuhdeväkivallasta ja turvakotien selviytymistä tukevasta asiakastyöstä [Violent intimate relationship, client status and change. process evaluation of violence in intimate relationships and of client work in shelters to support coping]. Helsinki, Finland: Ensi-ja turvakotien liitto.
36.
Oranen, M. (2001). Perheväkivallan varjossa. Raportti lapsikeskeisen työn kehittämisestä [Shadowed by domestic violence. Report on developing child-focused work]. Helsinki, Finland: Ensi-ja turvakotien liitto.
37.
Överlien, C., Aronsson, K., & Hyden, M. (2004). The focus group method as an in-depth method?— Young women talking about sexuality. In C. Överlien (Ed.),Girls on the verge of exploring. Voices of sexual abuse, agency & sexuality at a youth detention home (Linköping studies in arts and science no. 301). Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University, Department of Child Studies.
38.
Piispa, M. (2004). Age and meanings of violence women's experiences of partner violence in Finland. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 30-48.
39.
Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of life 2. An invitation to a critical humanism. London: Sage.
40.
Pösö, T. (2004). Vakavat silmät ja muita kokemuksia koulukodista [Serious eyes and other experiences of the reform school]. Helsinki, Finland: Stakes.
41.
Pugsley, L., Coffey, A., & Delamont, S. (1996). I don't eat peas anyway! Classroom stories and the social construction of childhood. In I. Butler & I. Shaw (Eds.),A case of neglect? Children's experiences and the sociology of childhood (pp. 56-67). Sydney: Aldershot.
42.
Sætre, M. (1997). Kategorisering og spesifisering av voldsfeltet [Categorization and specification of the field of violence]. Oslo, Norway: Kompetansesenteret for voldsofferarbeid.
43.
Salfati, C. (2000). The nature of expressiveness and instrumentality in homicide. Homicide Studies, 4, 265-293.
44.
Sariola, H. (1993). Laitosväkivalta [Institutional violence]. In Miten auttaa lasta (pp. 215-232). Helsinki, Finland: Lastensuojelun Keskusliitto.
45.
Schinkel, W. (2004). The will to violence. Theoretical Criminology,8, 5-31.
46.
Stanko, E. (2003). Introduction. Conceptualising the meanings of violence. In E. Stanko (Ed.),The meanings of violence (pp. 1-14). London: Routledge.
47.
Stanko, E., & Lee, R. (2003). Introduction: Methodological reflections. In M. Raymond & E. Stanko (Eds.),Researching violence. Essays on methodology and measurement (pp. 1-12). London: Routledge.
48.
Sykes, G., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review,22, 664-670.
49.
Tedeshi, J., & Felson, R. (1994). Violence, aggression & coercive actions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
50.
Wolfgang, M. E., & Ferracuti, F. (1967). The subculture of violence. Towards an integrated theory in criminology. London: Tavistock.
