Research conducted to date has not shown juvenile shock incarceration (boot camp) programs to favorably affect recidivism. The authors extend the literature by comparing the recidivism of juveniles who completed a shock incarceration program that included a systematic aftercare phase with recidivism among a matched control group of juveniles released from more traditional residential placements. Findings were mixed as regards recidivism at 4-, 8-, and 12-month follow-ups. There were no differences in reconvictions at 8-or 12-month follow-ups and no differences in reoffense seriousness across time frames. However, a significantly lower proportion of the boot camp group recidivated during the initial 4-month aftercare phase, and at 12 months, a lower proportion had been recommitted to residential placements. Older juveniles had significantly higher recidivism scores than did younger ones. The findings demonstrate the importance of combining shock incarceration with quality aftercare.
Altschuler, D. M. (1998). Intermediate sanctions and community treatment for serious and violent juvenile offenders. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions(pp. 367-385). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Altschuler, D. M., Armstrong, T. L., & MacKenzie, D. L. (1999). Reintegration, supervised release, and intensive aftercare. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
3.
Altschuler, D. M., & Brash, R. (2004). Adolescent and teenage offenders confronting the challenges and opportunities of reentry. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 72-87.
4.
Bottcher, J., & Ezell, M. E. (2005). Examining the effectiveness of boot camps: A randomized experiment with a long-term follow up. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 309-332.
5.
Bourque, B. B., Cronin, R. C., Pearson, F. R., Felker, D. B., Han, M., & Hill, S. M. (1996). Boot camps for juvenile offenders: An implementation evaluation of three demonstration programs.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
6.
Bourque, B. B., Han, M., & Hill, S. M. (1996). A national survey of aftercare provisions for boot camp graduates.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
7.
Burns, J. C., & Vito, G. F. (1995). An impact analysis of the Alabama Boot Camp Program. Federal Probation, 59, 63-67.
8.
California Department of the Youth Authority. (1997). LEAD: A boot camp and intensive parole program: The final impact evaluation. Sacramento: California Department of the Youth Authority.
9.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
10.
Correia, M. E. (1997). Boot camps, exercise, and delinquency: An analytical critique of the use of physical exercise to facilitate decreases in delinquent behavior. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 13, 94-113.
11.
Ethridge, P. A., & Sorensen, J. R. (1997). An analysis of attitudinal change and community adjustment among probationers in a county boot camp. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 13, 139-154.
12.
Fagan, J. A. (1990). Treatment and reintegration of violent juvenile offenders: Experimental results. Justice Quarterly, 7, 233-263.
13.
Florida Department of Juvenile Justice. (1997). Bay County Sheriff's Office Juvenile Boot Camp: A follow-up study of the first seven platoons. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Juvenile Justice.
14.
Gover, A. R., MacKenzie, D. L., & Armstrong, G. S. (2000). Importation and deprivation explanations of juveniles' adjustment to correctional facilities. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 450-467.
15.
Gover, A. R., MacKenzie, D. L., & Styve, G. J. (2000). Boot camps and traditional correctional facilities for juveniles: A comparison of the participants, daily activities, and environments. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 53-68.
16.
Howell, J. C. (2003). Preventing & reducing juvenile delinquency: A comprehensive framework. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Jones, M. A., & Ross, D. L. (1997). Is less better? Boot camp, regular probation and rearrest in North Carolina. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 147-161.
18.
Josi, D., & Sechrest, D. K. (1999). A pragmatic approach to parole aftercare: Evaluation of a community reintegration program for high-risk youthful offenders. Justice Quarterly, 16, 51-80.
19.
Kempinen, C. A., & Kurlychek, M. C. (2003). An outcome evaluation of Pennsylvania's boot camp: Does rehabilitative programming within a disciplinary setting reduce recidivism?Crime & Delinquency, 49, 581-602.
20.
Lipsey, M. W. (1999). Can rehabilitative programs reduce the recidivism of juvenile offenders? An inquiry into the effectiveness of practical programs. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law, 6, 611-641.
21.
Lutze, F. E. (2001). The influence of a shock incarceration program on inmate adjustment and attitudinal change. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 255-267.
22.
Lutze, F. E., & Brody, D. C. (1999). Mental abuse as cruel and unusual punishment: Do boot camp prisons violate the Eighth Amendment?Crime & Delinquency, 45, 242-255.
23.
Lutze, F. E., & Murphy, D. W. (1999). Ultramasculine prison environments and inmates' adjustment: It's time to move beyond the “boys will be boys” paradigm. Justice Quarterly, 16, 709-733.
24.
MacKenzie, D. L., & Armstrong, G. S. (2004). Correctional boot camps: Military basic training or a model for corrections?Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
MacKenzie, D. L., Brame, R., McDowall, D., & Souryal, C. (1995). Boot camp prisons and recidivism in eight states. Criminology, 33, 327-357.
26.
MacKenzie, D. L., & Souryal, C. (1995). Inmates' attitude change during incarceration: A comparison of boot camp with traditional prison. Justice Quarterly, 12, 325-353.
27.
MacKenzie, D. L., Wilson, D. B., Armstrong, G. S., & Gover, A. R. (2001). The impact of boot camps and traditional institutions on juvenile residents: Perceptions, adjustment, and change. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 279-313.
28.
Miller, A. J., & Grossi, E. L. (1998). Assessing educational gains of boot camp inmates: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Crime and Justice, 21, 103-118.
29.
Minor, K. I. (1999). Is recidivism a valid measure of correctional success? In C. B. Fields (Ed.), Controversial issues in corrections (pp. 1-8). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
30.
Minor, K. I., Hartmann, D. J., & Davis, S. F. (1990). Preserving internal validity in correctional evaluation research: The biased assignment design as an alternative to randomized design. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 6, 216-225.
31.
Morash, M., & Rucker, L. (1990). A critical look at the idea of boot camp as a correctional reform. Crime & Delinquency, 36, 204-222.
32.
Peters, M., Thomas, D., & Zamberlan, C. (1997). Boot camps for juvenile offenders.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
33.
Reid-MacNevin, S. A. (1997). Boot camps for young offenders: A politically acceptable punishment. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 13, 155-171.
34.
Sontheimer, H., & Goodstein, L. (1993). Evaluation of juvenile intensive aftercare probation: Aftercare versus system response effects. Justice Quarterly, 10, 197-227.
35.
Spencer, M. D., & Jones-Walker, C. (2004). Interventions and services offered to former juvenile offenders reentering their communities: An analysis of program effectiveness. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 88-97.
36.
Steele, W. R. (1997). Changes in self-efficacy expectancy, outcome expectancy, and self-esteem in incarcerated juvenile boot camp participants. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 5-B-5-B. (Item No. 1997-95022-382)
37.
Stinchcomb, J., & Terry, W. C., III. (2001). Predicting the likelihood of rearrest among shock incarceration graduates: Moving beyond another nail in the boot camp coffin. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 221-242.
38.
Styve, G. J., MacKenzie, D. L., Gover, A. R., & Mitchell, O. (2000). Perceived conditions of confinement: A national evaluation of juvenile boot camps and traditional facilities. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 297-308.
39.
Trulson, C. R., & Triplett, R. (1999). School-based juvenile boot camps: Evaluating specialized treatment and rehabilitation (STAR). Journal for Juvenile Justice and Detention Services, 14,19-43.
40.
Trulson, C. R., Triplett, R., & Snell, C. (2001). Social control in a school setting: Evaluating a school-based boot camp. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 573-609.
41.
Tyler, J., Darville, R., & Stalnaker, K. (2001). Juvenile boot camps: A descriptive analysis of program diversity and effectiveness. Social Science Journal, 38, 455-471.
42.
Wiebush, R. G., Wagner, D., McNulty, B., Wang, Y., & Le, T. (2005). Implementation and outcome evaluation of the Intensive Aftercare Program: Final report. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
