In 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that because they are less culpable and less able to deliberate about their behaviors, the execution of mentally retarded offenders exceeded the prevailing standards of decency (Atkins v. Virginia). Based on this rationale, and with increasing concerns over wrongful convictions and the execution of innocent defendants, some questioned whether the Court’s decision could also apply to juvenile offenders. In March 2005, the majority of the justices determined that executing adolescent offenders violated the Eighth Amendment (Roper v. Simmons). This article reviews (a) recent court decisions on the death penalty, (b) citizen and student opinions on juvenile executions, and (c) comparative policies on juvenile executions. The authors also discuss the politics of the death penalty and the consequences of Roper on juvenile justice policy.
ACLU of Michigan. (2004). Second chances: Juveniles serving life without parole in Michigan prisons. Retrieved January 6, 2005, from http://www.aclumich.org/pubs/juvenilelifers.pdf
2.
Aguayo, T. (2004). Teenager can serve probation at home. New York Times. Retrieved January 7, 2005, from http://www.nytimes.com
3.
Amnesty International USA. (2004). More positive news. Retrieved July 27, 2004, from http://www.amnestyusa.org/abolish/juveniles/updates.html
4.
Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002).
5.
Banner, S. (2005, March 6). When killing a juvenile was routine. The New York Times, p. 4.
6.
Benekos, P. J. (2004). [Student attitudes on criminal justice issues]. Unpublished raw data.
7.
Benekos, P. J., Merlo, A. V., Cook, W. J., & Bagley, K. (2002). A preliminary study of student attitudes on juvenile justice policy. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 13, 273-296.
8.
Bernard, T. (1992). The cycles of juvenile justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Bohm, R. M. (1991). American death penalty opinion, 1936-1986: A critical examination of the Gallup polls. In R. M. Bohm (Ed.), The death penalty in America: Current research (pp. 113-145). Highland Heights, KY: Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences/Anderson Publishing.
10.
Burnett, D. M. R., Noblin, C. D., & Prosser, V. (2004). Adjudicative competency in a juvenile population. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 438-462.
11.
Cooperman, A. (2005, March 21). Catholic bishops plan drive against death penalty. Washington Post. Retrieved April 3, 2005, from http://www.washingtonpost.com
12.
Cothern, L. (2000). Juveniles and the death penalty. Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
13.
Davey, M., & Wilgoren, J. (2005, March 24). Signs of danger were missed in a troubled teenager’s life. The New York Times. Retrieved April 14, 2005, from http://www.nytimes.com
14.
Death Penalty Information Center. (2004a). Innocence. Retrieved February 25, 2004, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org
15.
Death Penalty Information Center. (2004b). Juvenile offenders currently on death row, or executed, by state. Retrieved February 25, 2004, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org
16.
Death Penalty Information Center. (2004c). National polls. Retrieved February 25, 2004, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org
17.
Death Penalty Information Center. (2004d). Ryan Matthews is 115th death row inmate freed. Retrieved August 11, 2004, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org
18.
Death Penalty Information Center. (2004e). South Dakota legislators vote to ban death penalty for juveniles. Retrieved March 1, 2004, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org
19.
Death Penalty Information Center. (2004f). Wyoming legislators vote to ban juvenile death penalty. Retrieved March 1, 2004, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org
20.
Death Penalty Information Center. (2005a). The death penalty in 2004: Year end report. Retrieved January 6, 2005, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org
21.
Death Penalty Information Center. (2005b). Death row inmates by state and size of death row by year. Retrieved March 24, 2005, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org
22.
Death Penalty Information Center. (2005c). Juveniles and the death penalty. Retrieved January 6, 2005, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org
23.
Death Penalty Information Center. (2005d). New York takes historic step towards ending the death penalty. Retrieved April 14, 2005, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org
24.
Drew, K. (2004, January 26). U.S. one of a few nations with juvenile death laws. CNN.com. Retrieved February 18, 2004, from http://www.cnn.com
25.
Elmasry, F. (2005, March 8). Americans react to Supreme Court ban on juvenile death penalty. Retrieved March 26, 2005, from http://www.voanews.com
26.
Feld, B. C. (2003). Competency, culpability, and punishment: Implications of Atkins for executing and sentencing adolescents. Hofstra Law Review, 32, 463-552.
27.
Glaberson, W. (2003, September 21). Fewer executions sought, signaling new wariness. The New York Times, p. 32.
28.
Goodnough, A. (2004, January 27). Florida youth who got life terms for killing is freed at 16. The New York Times, p. A12
29.
Greenhouse, L. (2003, January 28). Justices deny inmate appeal in execution of juveniles. The New York Times, p. A19.
30.
Greenhouse, L. (2004, January 27). Court to review using execution in juvenile cases. The New York Times, pp. A1, A19.
31.
Hain v. Mullin, 123 S. Ct. 993 (2003).
32.
Hughes, J. (2003). For mice or men or children? Will the expansion of the Eighth Amendment in Atkins v. Virginia force the Supreme Court to re-examine the minimum age for the death penalty?Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 93, 973-1008.
33.
In re Stanford, 537 U.S. 968 (2002).
34.
Jordan, L. J. (2004, January 23). Lawmaker aims to test high school students for drugs. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved June 18, 2004, from http://www.post-gazette.com
35.
Juvenile death penalty ruling is unfortunate. (2005, March 3). Bowling Green Daily News. Retrieved March 30, 2005, from http://www.bgdailynews.com
36.
Juvenile Law Center. (2005). Child advocates pleased with U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to end juvenile death penalty. Retrieved April 5, 2005, from http://www.jlc.org
37.
Kurlychek, M. C., & Johnson, B. D. (2004). The juvenile penalty: A comparison of juvenile and young adult sentencing outcomes in criminal court. Criminology, 42, 485-517.
38.
Lambert, E., & Clarke, A. (2001). The impact of information on an individual’s support of the death penalty: A partial test of the Marshall hypothesis among college students. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12, 215-234.
39.
Lawrence, R. (1998). School crime and juvenile justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
Liptak, A. (2002, August 30). 3 justices call for reviewing death sentences for juveniles. The New York Times, pp. A1, A10.
41.
Liptak, A. (2003, June 15). Juries reject death penalty in nearly all federal trials. The New York Times, p. A12.
42.
Liptak, A. (2004, March 14). New challenge for courts: How to define retardation. The New York Times, p. A12.
43.
Mears, B. (2003, January 29). Supreme court not ready to debate execution of juveniles. CNN.com. Retrieved February 18, 2004, from http://www.cnn.com
44.
Mears, B. (2004, January 26). Supreme court will revisit execution of teenage killers. CNN.com. Retrieved February 18, 2004, from http://www.cnn.com
45.
Moon, M. M., Wright, J. P., Cullen, F. T., & Pealer, J. A. (2000). Putting kids to death: Specifying public support for juvenile capital punishment. Justice Quarterly, 17, 663-684.
46.
Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. Retrieved April 11, 2005, from http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/k2crc.htm
47.
Patterson v. Texas, 123 S.Ct. 24 (2002).
48.
Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989).
49.
Puzzanchera, C. M. (2003). Delinquency cases waived to criminal court, 1990-1999. OJJDP Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
50.
Richey, W. (2003, November 21). Sniper case revisits juvenile death penalty. Christian Science Monitor, p. 2.
51.
Rimer, S. (2004, January 4). Unruly students facing arrest, not detention. The New York Times, pp. 1, 15.
52.
Roper v. Simmons, No. 03-633.
53.
Roper v. Simmons, 125 S.Ct. 1183 (2005).
54.
Salt of the Earth. (2005). USCCB/Amnesty International applaud new court restriction on death penalty for juvenile offenders. Retrieved April 4, 2005, from http://www.salt.claretianpubs.org
55.
Sandys, M., & McGarrell, E. F. (1995). Attitudes toward capital punishment: Preference for the penalty or mere acceptance?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 191-213.
56.
Sickmund, M. (2003). Juveniles in court. National report series. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
57.
Simmons v. Roper, 112 S.W. 3d 397 (Mo., Aug. 26, 2003).
58.
Skovron, S. E., Scott, J. E., & Cullen, F. T. (1989). The death penalty for juveniles: An assessment of public support. Crime & Delinquency, 35, 546-561.
59.
Snyder, H. N. (2003). Juvenile arrests 2001. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
60.
Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics. (2002). Retrieved February 24, 2004, from http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook
61.
Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989).
62.
Steinberg, L., & Scott, E. S. (2003). Less guilty by reason of adolescence. America Psychologist, 38, 1009-1018.
63.
Streib, V. L. (2004). The juvenile death penalty today: Death sentences and executions for juvenile crimes, January 1, 1973-December 31, 2003. Retrieved February 4, 2004, from http://www.law.onu.edu/faculty/streib
64.
Strom, K. J. (2000). Profile of state prisoners under age 18, 1985-97. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
65.
Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988).
66.
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. (2005). The Catholic campaign to end the use of the death penalty. Retrieved April 4, 2005, from http://www.usccb.org
67.
Vogel, B. L., & Vogel, R. E. (2003). The age of death: Appraising public opinion of juvenile capital punishment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 169-183.
68.
Weeks, R. A. (2003). Comparing children to the mentally retarded: How the decision in Atkins v. Virginia will affect the execution of juvenile offenders. Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law, 17, 451-485.
69.
Whitt, L. A., Clarke, A. W., & Lambert, E. (2002). Innocence matters: How innocence recasts the death penalty debate. Criminal Law Bulletin, 38, 670-735.
70.
Will, G. (2005, March 6). Justice Kennedy begins legislating again. Erie Times News, p. 3B.
71.
Yen, H. (2005, March 14). Scalia slams juvenile death penalty ruling. Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Retrieved March 26, 2005, from http://www.seattlepi.nwsource.com
