Contemporary concerns about youth violence and related legislative reforms have resulted in greater numbers of adolescent offenders being handled in the adult criminal justice system. Although some past research suggests that juveniles transferred to adult court often receive somewhat lenient treatment, more recent studies focusing on violent youthful offenders have found the adult system to be more punitive in nature. This study examined this issue for 557 violent youth from Pennsylvania, of which 138 were judicially waived to adult court. Statistical analyses revealed that in terms of punishment certainty, severity, and swiftness, juveniles transferred to adult court were treated more harshly than were those retained in juvenile court, whereas juvenile court processing occurred much more quickly. Corresponding policy implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldrich, J.H., & Nelson, F.D. (1984). Linear probability, logit, and probit models (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 07-045). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Bachman, R., & Paternoster, R. (1997). Statistical methods for criminology and criminal justice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
Barnes, C.W., & Franz, R.S. (1989). Questionably adult: Determinants and effects of the juvenile waiver decision. Justice Quarterly, 6, 117-135.
4.
Bartol, C.R., & Bartol, A.M. (1998). Delinquency and justice: A psychosocial approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
Binder, A., Geis, G., & Bruce, D.D. (2001). Juvenile delinquency: Historical, cultural, and legal perspectives (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
6.
Bishop, D.M. (2000). Juvenile offenders in the adult criminal justice system. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 27, pp. 81-167). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Bishop, D.M., Frazier, C.E., & Henretta, J.C. (1989). Prosecutorial waiver: Case study of a questionable reform. Crime and Delinquency, 35, 179-201.
8.
Bishop, D.M., Frazier, C.E., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Winner, L. (1996). The transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Does it make a difference? Crime and Delinquency, 42, 171-191.
9.
Blumstein, A. (1995). Youth violence, guns, and the illicit-drug industry. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 10-36.
10.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J., & Visher, C. (1986). Criminal careers and “career criminals.” Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11.
Bortner, M.A. (1986). Traditional rhetoric, organizational realities: Remand of juveniles to adult court. Crime and Delinquency, 32, 53-73.
12.
Bortner, M.A., & Reed, W.L. (1985). The preeminence of process: An example of refocused justice research. Social Science Quarterly, 66, 413-425.
13.
Butts, J.A. (1997). Necessarily relative: Is juvenile justice speedy enough? Crime and Delinquency, 43, 3-23.
14.
Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. In N.L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1-76). Chicago: Rand McNally.
15.
Champion, D.J. (1989). Teenage felons and waiver hearings: Some recent trends, 1980-1988. Crime and Delinquency, 35, 577-585.
16.
Clarke, E.E. (1996). A case for reinventing juvenile transfer. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 47, 3-22.
17.
Clarke, S.H., & Koch, G.G. (1980). Juvenile court: Therapy or crime control, and do lawyers make a difference? Law and Society Review, 14, 263-308.
18.
Clemment, M.J. (1997). A five-year study of juvenile waiver and adult sentences: Implications for policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 8, 201-219.
19.
Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
20.
Cook, P.J., & Laub, J.H. (1998). The unprecedented epidemic in youth violence. In M. Tonry & M.H. Moore (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 24, pp. 27-64). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Crimes Code of Pennsylvania, 18 PA C.S. Sec. 2301. (2000). Binghamton, NY: Gould.
22.
Dannefer, D. (1984). Who signs the complaint? Relation distance and the juvenile justice process. Law and Society Review, 18, 249-271.
23.
DeFrances, C.J., & Strom, K.J. (1997). Juveniles prosecuted in state criminal courts (Report No. NCJ-164265). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
24.
Eigen, J.P. (1981a). The determinants and impact of jurisdictional transfer in Philadelphia. In J.C. Hall, D.M. Hamparian, J.M. Pettibone, & J.L. White (Eds.), Major issues in juvenile justice information and training: Readings in public policy (pp. 333-350). Columbus, OH: Academy for Contemporary Problems.
25.
Eigen, J.P. (1981b). Punishing youth homicide offenders in Philadelphia. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72, 1072-1093.
26.
Elrod, P., & Ryder, P.S. (1999). Juvenile justice: A social, historical, and legal perspective. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
27.
Emerson, R. (1981). On last resorts. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 1-22.
28.
Erdley, D. (2002, April 14). Pine Grove: Experimental juvenile prison built for a crime wave that didn’t happen. Pittsburgh Sunday Tribune Review, pp. A1, A12.
29.
Fagan, J. (1990). Social and legal policy dimensions of violent juvenile crime. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 93-133.
30.
Fagan, J. (1995). Separating the men from the boys: The comparative advantage of juvenile versus criminal court sanctions on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. In J.C. Howell, B. Krisberg, J.D. Hawkins, & J.J. Wilson (Eds.), A sourcebook: Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders (pp. 238-260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Fagan, J., & Deschenes, E.P. (1990). Determinants of judicial waiver decisions for violent juvenile offenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81, 314-347.
32.
Fagan, J., Forst, M., & Vivona, T.S. (1987). Racial determinants of the judicial transfer decision: Prosecuting violent youth in criminal court. Crime and Delinquency, 33, 259-286.
33.
Fagan, J., & Wilkinson, D.L. (1998). Guns, youth violence, and social identity in inner cities. In M. Tonry & M.H. Moore (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 24, pp. 105-188). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Farrington, D.P. (1986). Age and crime. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 7, pp. 189-250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Farrington, D.P. (1998). Predictors, causes, and correlates of male youth violence. In M. Tonry & M.H. Moore (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 24, pp. 421-475). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1988-1997). Uniform crime reports for the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
37.
Feiler, S.M., & Sheley, J.F. (1999). Legal and racial elements of public willingness to transfer juvenile offenders to adult court. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 55-64.
38.
Feld, B.C. (1987). The juvenile court meets the principle of the offense: Legislative changes in juvenile waiver statutes. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 78, 471-533.
39.
Feld, B.C. (1988). In re Gault revisited: A cross-state comparison of the right to counsel in juvenile court. Crime and Delinquency, 34, 393-424.
40.
Feld, B.C. (1989). Bad law makes hard cases: Reflections on teen-aged axe-murderers, judicial activism, and legislative default. Journal of Law and Inequality, 8, 1-101.
41.
Feld, B.C. (1993). Criminalizing the American juvenile court. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 17, pp. 197-280). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Flaherty, M. (1980). An assessment of the incidence of juvenile suicide in adult jails, lock-ups, and juvenile detention centers. Champaign, IL: Community Research Forum.
43.
Forst, M.L., & Blomquist, M.E. (1991). Cracking down on juveniles: The changing ideology of youth corrections. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, 5, 323-375.
44.
Forst, M., Fagan, J., & Vivona, T.S. (1989). Youth in prisons and training schools: Perceptions and consequences of the treatment-custody dichotomy. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 40, 1-14.
45.
Frazier, C.E., & Cochran, J.C. (1986). Detention of juveniles: Its effects on subsequent juvenile court processing decisions. Youth and Society, 17, 286-305.
46.
Fritsch, E., & Hemmens, C. (1995). Juvenile waiver in the United States 1979-1995: A comparison and analysis of state waiver statutes. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 46, 17-35.
47.
Fritsch, E.J., Caeti, T.J., & Hemmens, C. (1996). Spare the needle but not the punishment: The incarceration of waived youth in Texas prisons. Crime and Delinquency, 42, 593-609.
48.
Geraghty, T.F. (1998). Justice for children: How do we get there? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 190-241.
49.
Gillespie, L.K., & Norman, M.D. (1984). Does certification mean prison: Some preliminary findings from Utah. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 35, 23-34.
Greenwood, P.W. (1995). Juvenile crime and juvenile justice. In J.Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime (pp. 91-117). San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
52.
Griffin, P., Torbet, P., & Szymanski, L. (1998). Trying juveniles as adults in criminal court: An analysis of state transfer provisions (Report No. NCJ-172836). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
53.
Hamparian, D., Estep, L.K., Muntean, S.M., Prestino, R., Swisher, R.G., Wallace, P.L., et al. (1982). Youth in adult court: Between two worlds. Columbus, OH: Academy for Contemporary Problems.
54.
Houghtalin, M., & Mays, G.L. (1991). Criminal dispositions of New Mexico juveniles transferred to adult court. Crime and Delinquency, 37, 393-407.
55.
Howell, J.C. (1996). Juvenile transfers to the criminal justice system: State of the art. Law and Policy, 18, 17-60.
Kinder, K., Veneziano, C., Fichter, M., & Azuma, H. (1995). A comparison of the dispositions of juvenile offenders certified as adults with juvenile offenders not certified. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 46, 37-42.
Lemmon, J.H., Sontheimer, H., & Saylor, K.A. (1991). A study of Pennsylvania juveniles transferred to criminal court in 1986. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Juvenile Court Judges Commission.
60.
Lewis-Beck, M.S. (1980). Applied regression: An introduction (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 07-022). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
61.
McDowall, D., Loftin, C., & Wiersema, B. (1992). A comparative study of the effects of mandatory sentencing laws for gun crimes. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 378-394.
62.
Meddis, S.V. (1993, October 29). Poll: Treat juveniles the same as adult offenders. USA Today, pp. A1, A11.
63.
Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 07-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
Merlo, A.V., & Benekos, P.J. (2000). What’s wrong with the criminal justice system: Ideology, politics, and the media. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
65.
Moore, M.H., & Wakeling, S. (1997). Juvenile justice: Shoring up the foundations. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 22, pp. 253-301). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66.
Morse, S.J. (1998). Immaturity and irresponsibility. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 15-67.
67.
Murray, C.A., & Cox, L.A. (1979). Beyond probation: Juvenile corrections and the chronic delinquent. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
68.
Myers, D.L. (2001). Excluding violent youth from juvenile court: The effectiveness of legislative waiver. New York: LFB Scholarly.
69.
Myers, D.L. (2003a). The house of last resort: Incarcerating juveniles in adult prisons. In S.H. Decker, L.F. Alarid, & C.M. Katz (Eds.), Controversies in criminal justice (pp. 321-329). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
70.
Myers, D.L. (2003b). The recidivism of violent youth in juvenile and adult court: A consideration of selection bias. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 79-101.
71.
Myers, D.L., & Kiehl, K. (2001). The pre-dispositional status of violent youthful offenders: Is there a “custody gap” in adult criminal court? Justice Research and Policy, 3, 115-143.
72.
Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M.H. (1989). Applied linear regression models (2nd ed.). Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
73.
Paternoster, R., & Iovanni, L. (1989). The labeling perspective and delinquency: An elaboration of the theory and an assessment of the evidence. Justice Quarterly, 6, 359-394.
74.
Pennsylvania Juvenile Court Judges Commission. (1996). The Juvenile Act. 42 PA C.S. Sec. 6301 et seq. Harrisburg, PA: Author.
75.
Podkopacz, M.R., & Feld, B.C. (1996). The end of the line: An empirical study of judicial waiver. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 449-492.
76.
Poulos, T.M., & Orchowsky, S. (1994). Serious juvenile offenders: Predicting the probability of transfer to criminal court. Crime and Delinquency, 40, 3-17.
77.
Reddington, F.P., & Sapp, A.D. (1997). Juveniles in adult prisons: Problems and prospects. Journal of Crime and Justice, 20, 139-152.
78.
Royscher, M., & Edelman, P. (1981). Treating juveniles as adults in New York: What does it mean and how is it working? In J.C. Hall, D.M. Hamparian, J.M. Pettibone, & J.L. White (Eds.), Major issues in juvenile justice information and training: Readings in public policy (pp. 265-293). Columbus, OH: Academy for Contemporary Problems.
79.
Rudman, C., Hartstone, E., Fagan, J., & Moore, M. (1986). Violent youth in adult court: Process and punishment. Crime and Delinquency, 32, 75-96.
80.
Sagatun, I., McCollum, L.L., & Edwards, L. (1985). The effect of transfers from juvenile to criminal court: A loglinear analysis. Journal of Crime and Justice, 8, 65-92.
81.
Schneider, A.L., & Ervin, L. (1990). Specific deterrence, rational choice, and decision heuristics: Applications in juvenile justice. Social Science Quarterly, 71, 585-601.
82.
Schwartz, I.M. (1989). (In)justice for juveniles. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
83.
Schwartz, I.M., Guo, S., & Kerbs, J.J. (1993). The impact of demographic variables on public opinion regarding juvenile justice: Implications for public policy. Crime and Delinquency, 39, 5-28.
84.
Scott, E.S., & Grisso, T. (1998). The evolution of adolescence: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice reform. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 137-189.
85.
Sickmund, M., Snyder, H.N., & Poe-Yamagata, E. (1997). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1997 update on violence (Report No. NCJ-165703). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
86.
Singer, S.I. (1993). The automatic waiver of juveniles and substantive justice. Crime and Delinquency, 39, 253-261.
87.
Singer, S.I. (1996). Recriminalizing delinquency: Violent juvenile crime and juvenile justice reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
88.
Smith, D.A., & Paternoster, R. (1990). Formal processing and future delinquency: Deviance amplification as a selection artifact. Law and Society Review, 24, 1109-1131.
89.
Snyder, H.N. (2001). Law enforcement and juvenile crime (Report No. NCJ-191031). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
90.
Snyder, H.N., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 national report (Report No. NCJ-178257). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
91.
Sprott, J.B. (1998). Understanding public opposition to a separate youth justice system. Crime and Delinquency, 44, 399-411.
92.
Thomas, C.W., & Bilchik, S. (1985). Prosecuting juveniles in criminal courts: A legal and empirical analysis. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76, 439-479.
93.
Torbet, P., Gable, R., Hurst, H.I., Montgomery, I., Szymanski, L., & Thomas, D. (1996). State responses to serious and violent juvenile crime (Report No. NCJ-161565). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
94.
Wells, R. (2002, January 9). Graduation caps SCI Pine Grove’s first year. Indiana Gazette, pp. 1, 12.
95.
White Stack, B. (2001, November 23). Adult time prison too big: Indiana County teen lockup has hundreds of vacant beds. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, pp. B1, B5.
96.
Winner, L., Lanza-Kaduce, L., Bishop, D.M., & Frazier, C.E. (1997). The transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Reexamining recidivism over the long term. Crime and Delinquency, 43, 548-563.
97.
Wolfgang, M., Figlio, R., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
98.
Zimmerman, S., Myers, D., Giever, D., Dandeneau, C., Gido, R., Kiehl, K., et al. (2000). Establishing a research institution: The partnership between IUP and the Pine Grove Prison for violent youthful offenders. Journal for Juvenile Justice and Detention Services, 15, 67-84.
